Nov. 10th, 2013 Successful Over-Unity Experiment

[NathanCoppedge]

I have a device in which, through a supporting divided track, a ball weight is lifted by counterweight and then triggers the counterweight to move upwards, WITH ITS OWN WEIGHT ALONE.

Here is the video, which is real, which I have posted on an academic website:

http://www.academicroom.com/video/evidence-against-classical-model

It is my belief that this is final proof of over-unity.

Although the device is not perpetual in its current form, since the marble can be made (I believe) to not lose altitude --- since it gains altitude while being moved by the lever --- I believe that eight of these devices may be positioned in a horizontal octagon to produce a continuous cycle, as shown at the following link:

http://www.nathancoppedge.com/Perpetual_Motion_RepeatingLeverage_Diagrams.html

It would be great to get more enthusiasm behind these simple-seeming devices, which have been designed with so superior a principle. Or, in this case, 6 perfect principles, which I will list here:

(1) It begins from rest and uses no electricity or stored energy, except a counterweight, (2) It moves upwards and then downwards on its own, (3) It uses a principle of weight versus leverage, with the weight at a lesser leverage distance, (4) It makes use of a supporting track, which creates in imbalance between the mobile weight and the counterweight, (5) The lever is unbalanced at every point of motion, and (6) All parts may return to their initial altitudes after motion.

My other recent notable experiment is the Master Angle, tested on July 3rd, 2014, proven, I believe, to allow an object to roll upwards! Check out this video before you disbelieve! Its arranged using a horizontally-angled board which is positioned partly underneath the marble as it rolls sideways... Perhaps a new discovery? I don't know how to tell if it's new, I just know how to tell if it works, within a shade of certainty...

Here is the Master Angle video, for curious observers:

http://www.academicroom.com/video/master-angle-elementary-discovery

It can also be searched on YouTube under "Master Angle."

[TinselKoala]

Would you please define "overunity"  and tell us exactly how your apparatus and your demonstrations support your claim?

All of your videos that I've watched show you storing energy in the system with your hands, so I'm not sure how you can state that they don't involve stored energy or are overunity. Is there a video of your system that returns to the starting state exactly, without you using your hands to help out?

[tinman]

I think he forgot to add the energy it took to lift the counter weight up at the other end of the  device, when he placed the ball on the levers track, and pushed it down. But a bit hard to see the video on my phone, so will have another look when I get home from work tonight.

[gauschor]

Looks interesting but I don't grasp what's this track and ball counterweight. I'm hoping for a better video and explanation.

[NathanCoppedge]

Would you please define "overunity"  and tell us exactly how your apparatus and your demonstrations support your claim?

All of your videos that I've watched show you storing energy in the system with your hands, so I'm not sure how you can state that they don't involve stored energy or are overunity. Is there a video of your system that returns to the starting state exactly, without you using your hands to help out?

Here is what is necessary for perpetual motion in one of my types of devices: (A) Articulation over a point of balance, (B) Natural momentum, (C) Completed cycle. I have not completed all of these stages in any of my designs.

However, my successful over-unity experiment proves that motion can occur without loss of altitude, which has been a sticking point with modern physicists. As to whether force is inputted, no force is inputted except to put the force to raise the marble to the altitude it would maintain during part of the cycle. The video is dramatized by using a wider range of motion than it would adopt in real-life practice. In a real design, the range of motion would be fixed to a very narrow up-and-down movement. The high point of that motion is reached first by raising the marble by hand, and secondly through the natural motion of the apparatus. Notably, the end-point before the drop is HIGHER than the low point where the marble drops to. Also, the marble has the power to life the counterweight as much as necessary after the drop. Therefore, reasoning from the amount of energy the marble can exert, and the position of the counterweight before energy is exerted, it appears to be over-unity, and I believe that it in fact, is.

The effect is a achieved through a combination of six principles: (1) It begins from rest and uses no electricity or stored energy, except a counterweight, (2) It moves upwards and then downwards on its own, (3) It uses a principle of weight versus leverage, with the weight at a lesser leverage distance, (4) It makes use of a supporting track, which creates in imbalance between the mobile weight and the counterweight, (5) The lever is unbalanced at every point of motion, and (6) All parts may return to their initial altitudes after motion.