Need Leedskalnin PMH coil winding diagram

[sm0ky2]

If we consider the situation of 3 fields, in any configuration,
Two magnetic poles oppose one another, and act as a magnetic diode,
preventing a closed loop. (Or all 3 fields could oppose)


Unless we introduce a paramagnetic interface, to form a (capacitive)
secondary dipole [magnetic resistor?]
Example: the inactive dipoles in the tri-force.
               the steel balls form dipoles within to allow both magnets
               to be attracted to the metal.


Now, if this material were a ring or toroid,
and the magnetic currents were all directed to the ring...
(maybe the ring could be triangular in shape)
the space in the center would have an extremely intense magnetic field
and when the circuit is broken, all of that flux could then be directed into
an inductor. (which makes time travel possible?)

[sm0ky2]

If we can compact a pmh to a small device,
We have the ability to store energy, in the form of magnetic capacitance.


this can pave the way for entirely new types of megneto-electrical conversion
technology, and types of devices that are otherwise not conceivable.


Our theory of induction needs to be modified to include the other state.
The other condition of no electric flux. (when all of the flux is magnetic)
When magnetic saturation is at a maximum, and reluctance is in equilibrium
with impedance. This is a second low-energy state of the system.
A small change in magnetic field is resisted by the material and when removed,
the material returns to the magnetized state.
This is much different from our standard conception of paramagnetics.
In fact it is the mathematical inversion.
And is present in Maxwells equations.


We don't consider this condition because there is nowhere to apply it.
(except in the pmh)


But now we can.

[sm0ky2]

The Lorentz force opposes the collapse of the magnetic field.
Locking it into orientation.


Over time, this can physically alter the magnetic properties of a material.
For example, the non-magnetic 305-stainless steel balls in the above photo
After being left in a magnetic loop of 6 large balls, overnight


All 6 of the test balls are now "paramagnetic" and become magnetized in a magnetic field.
While the control balls, which were not placed in a PMH loop, remain in their non-magnetic state.


This occurs in all materials, wood, paper, plastics, etc. (provided the loop strength is sufficient)
This discovery was made many years ago by David Lambright, on accident, while experimenting
with the optical diffraction properties of the PMH external field.
His research showed that low-strength magnetic fields can alter the diffraction angle and polarization
of light through air (to my knowledge no vacuum experiments were done)


Upon completion of one experiment, an aluminum spacer was found to be paramagnetic.
This led to many experiments involving nearly every obtainable material.
Further discoveries show that the non-magnetic state is the precursor to the paramagnetic state,
and the paramagnetic state is the precursor to the magnetic state.


By placing any material into a PMH-loop, of specific intensity, the magnetic properties of the
material can be altered. And the process is reversible by reversing polarities.

[sm0ky2]

In the early stages of this technology, a theory was proposed
that tiny metallic particles may be transferred from the paramagnetic
material, imbedded into the non-magnetic material, by the extreme magnetic
force in the loop.


This theory was discredited by the fact that the material developed areas of
paramagnetism outside the points of physical contact.


This led me to Faraday and Maxwell's equations.
and the secondary stable magnetic state of materials.
(magnetization)
The same force that stabilizes ferromagnetism,
is responsible for the magnetic lock through the PMH loop.


The geometry of the magnetic path can take any shape.


We can send the magnetic loop down a paramagnetic wire to lock
a material far away.
In this manner, magnetic conductivity is similar to electrical conductivity.


The ohmic value equivalent to resistance, in a PMH circuit, is defined as:


Length (of the part of the circuit being analyzed)
Divided by [ permeability of free space * relative permeability of material * area]


Or simply  length / magnetic permeability constant of the material * cross-section area.


This must be separated into multiple equations in circuits that change in area (size) of material,
and through any materials that are different throughout the circuit.

Therefore, Ohm's Law is Not violated in the PMH.

[sm0ky2]

I don't know if there is a way to physically test the electrical
conductivity through an active PMH loop without disruption
of the effect.


But the PMH, with a non-magnetic junction in the loop
resembles properties of the Josephson Effect.


And by altering the magnetic susceptibility of a material,
we can control the strength of paramagnetic induction.


Simply put, we can have strong or weak paramagnetism
in samples of the same material.
This is demonstrated by placing consistent samples into
PMH loops of different intensity.
Stronger the PMH field-loop, the greater the magnetic susceptibility.
(there is a time factor involved that I am unclear about)


Further intuitive thought may indicate that we are changing
the permeability constant itself.
If this is the case, this knowledge may lead to the development
of stronger magnets than we thought possible.