HABTEC SOLAR CONVERTER

[Philip Hardcastle]

This is a verified new technology that is free to use.

www.habtec.com


3 Chinese factories have been asked to produce proof of physics devices for general sale so that entrepreneurs can do due diligence ahead of becoming HABTEC builders. I had hoped the Chinese companies would have already (by 20th August) provided their price, but alas I am still waiting for a final quote.


It is easy for anyone to build a HABTEC from scratch at home, the materials are tungsten and molybdenum foil, mica and emitter paint, the only difficulty is getting access to a high vacuum pump and emitter coatings (other than standard Ba/Sr Carbonate Transene Co. paint).


My wish, in giving this technology to the World for free, is to have as many people as possible get involved in a grass roots amateur driven revolution that will abate the use of coal.


I have turned down offers from a chief scientist of an Australian tech company (who carried out independent proof of concept test), and a leading University to discuss forming a JV, I am not interested in making a penny from HABTEC, but I will from IMP.....for phones.............soon.


Cheers

[MarkE]

Who has verified the technology?  When did they verify it?  What procedure did they use to verify it?  Where is the data from the experiments?

[orbut 3000]

This should be great news for operators of e-cat power plants. They have lots of waist heat to spare that could be converted with the habtech.


Is there a good reference design and list of equipment/materials to be published? What kind of vacuum pump is needed? Is a normal household phallus pump sufficient or is a special make/spec required? It would also help if you post detailed instructions for hobbyists to replicate the reference design.


Thanks and good luck.

[sarkeizen]

This is a verified new technology that is...

...likely neither new nor verified.

It is easy for anyone to build a HABTEC from scratch at home

doubtful.

My wish, in giving this technology to the World for free

What exactly have you given?  A vague set of instructions with no reason to believe that they work.

I have turned down offers from a chief scientist of an Australian tech company

A title which frequently sounds more impressive than it is.

(who carried out independent proof of concept test)

Which we will never get to see.

and a leading University to discuss forming a JV

You turned down a "discussion".  Is that supposed to be impressive?

, I am not interested in making a penny from HABTEC

Since you haven't made any money off any of your other crackpot ideas I'd say this is called "going with your strengths".

[celsus]

I suspect some people somewhere else are expecting an act of kapellophagy.

Posted By: PJH on Jun 4th 2014 I will feel obligated to consume said Akubra if I cannot provide to you verifiable proof of a working device in contradiction to 2LOT, please state what excuse you will use on the 20th August not to eat your yet to be nominated hat?