Oscillating sine wave LC tank magnet motor.

[synchro1]

@MarkE,

Nice dodge!

Quote from mark:

"So, what is that as much fun as magnetic viscosity may be, it is a loss mechanism.  More of the effect does not improve efficiency, it hurts efficiency".

The "Ramapo Plinth", a stone axe head found in a New Jersey river bed, complete with operating instructions in Proto-Phoenician; "Parry first then strike".  Additional fighting instructions from "Lao Tsu"; "One must first step backwards before one can leap forward". On the surface, these apparent "loss mechanisms" Yin strength inside Yang, yield extra power!

Placing a Neo magnet tube inside an output coil bore hole is strictly Tabu from an efficiency perspective. The magnet has an even greater magnetic viscosity then JLN's ferrite core, and slows the output coil pole reversal past TDC even more, resulting in rotor acceleration at a lower rotor threshold speed.

Everyone's told magnets are the worst choice for a coil core, because they 'Gum up the coil" too much. So, you're right about increased magnetic viscosity hurting efficency, but the loss helps increase "Lenz acceleration" by delaying the pole shift past TDC and suppling propulsion to the rotor at lower R.P.M.! Got it?

A non-shorted output coil goes unseen by the magnet rotor. Conradelectro agreed to test this kind of very high magnetic viscosity neo magnet core "Lenz Delay" coil over this past Yuletide, but neglected to connect the output coil wires together and got zero results, infuriating me.     

Proper positioning is crucial for both kinds of "High Magnetic Viscosity" output cores to get the maximum acceleration effect! JLN's tests help demonstrate the value of the "Synchro Coil"! Doug Konzen uploaded a video that demonstrates how attaching a magnet to the back side of a ferrite output coil core speeds his magnet rotor up and lowers input at low R.P.M. by increasing "Magnetic Viscosity" in this way!

[MarkE]

If you do the math properly, you will find that the "acceleration" never makes up for the loss.  Each adjustment to reduce the loss, weakens the acelleration.  Conversely, each effort to increase the acceleration increases the loss.

[synchro1]

@MarkE,

How do you measure a loss when the input drops as the rotor accelerates? Maybe you'll start to pretend you know more then Nicola Tesla like that other know it all show off, hiding in a side tracked portion of the London sewer system like a Sax Rohmer character, not Tyrone Power:

[synchro1]

We can lower the "Lenz Delay" R.P.M. threshold by attaching "Konzen" magnets to the back side of the ferrite cores, increasing the "Magnetic Viscosity" of the ferrite cores, and generally making it harder for their output coils to operate efficiently. This advantage allows us to tailor the other parameters, such as LC tank self oscillating frequency, and bearing design.

[synchro1]

MileHigh developed the extremely efficient MHOP circuit on my "Self Accelerating Reed Switch" thread that looks like a natural for the two coil power circuit under consideration. The circuit includes an onboard "Stroboscope". This circuit replaces the need for a signal generator and a Laser Tach. I rejected this initially because I didn't feel it would run up to "Lenz Delay" R.P.M. threshold speed; However, raising the output coil ferrite core "Magnetic Viscosity" with tail magnets like Doug demonstrates, would help it interface! 


The trigger and power coils would be joined on the "Flop Over" to Hartley Oscillator.