Joseph Henry - On the discovery of two distinct kinds of Dynamic Induction

[lancaIV]

forest,you have not ever to be skocked about electricity but sometimes also about the kind of use:
Joseph Henry invented one of the first electric news teleporting apparature,
the"Morse Alphabet" short-short-.. telegraph.


Mr.Morse "only" invented the alpha-beta,"the transmission language".


How worked the first "Henry telegraph transmissor" prototypes ? Probably the real physical construction shows his ,above  offered ,meanings ! Shielding/Isolation.


Sincerely
              OCWL

[hanon]

 Also William J. Hooper found a different field which could not be shielded. Perhaps you may find some interesting details into this link:

http://www.rexresearch.com/hooper/horizon.htm

Regards

[Kator01]

Hello,

this is a link to a german website http://www.pro-physik.de/details/news/prophy10910news/news.html. Some french researchers have proven that the A-Vectro-Potential is the cause foe induction in certain cases:

https://translate.google.de/translate?sl=de&tl=en&js=y&prev=_t&hl=de&ie=UTF-8&u=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.pro-physik.de%2Fdetails%2Fnews%2Fprophy10910news%2Fnews.html&edit-text=


Kator01

[hanon]

Hello,

this is a link to a german website http://www.pro-physik.de/details/news/prophy10910news/news.html. Some french researchers have proven that the A-Vectro-Potential is the cause foe induction in certain cases:

https://translate.google.de/translate?sl=de&tl=en&js=y&prev=_t&hl=de&ie=UTF-8&u=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.pro-physik.de%2Fdetails%2Fnews%2Fprophy10910news%2Fnews.html&edit-text=


Kator01

This same proposal is stated in the paper "Electromagnetic Induction without a field" by Monstein. He states that the real cause of induction is the A vector, which is real, and the B field is just a non-existent convention used to visualize the magnetic field.

A link to the PDF of the refered paper:
http://www.overunity.com/14711/is-faradays-induction-law-correct/dlattach/attach/139244/

Monstein´s work, as far as I know, has relation with the work of William J. Hopper:  http://jnaudin.free.fr/html/hoopmnst.htm

Also an interesting compilation of info about the A-vector. In the bottom of this page there is a very enlighting video:  http://www.hyiq.org/Research/Details?Name=A%20Vector%20Potential

Regards

[ramset]

This area [thread topic] shared by Fernandez is being looked at
as well as his most recent contribution below .[IMO all his contributions should be looked at]

post 261 here
http://overunity.com/17535/kapanadze-stepanov-barbosa-leal-and-the-secret-of-free-energy/255/#.Wog-oLmWzoY




Fernandez


« Reply #261 on: February 10, 2018, 06:19:32 AM »
Quote


                        ****************   February 9th 2018   ****************
Quote from: Zeitmaschine on February 06, 2018, 08:00:02 PM

I would rather suggest, the Kapanadze, Stepanov and Barbosa-Leal devices are just open electric systems. Such a system simply defeats Lenz's law and Ohm's law by connecting to the ambient medium as a source of energy.


response from Fernandez

User Zeitmaschine, I am going to give you credit, you put a lot of effort into your posts (even though you are wrong) BUT I want to put you and some others in this world on the right track and moving in the right direction.


Fernandez Quote

Here is the truth, take it or bury it
I will keep this short and drama free, the words Free Energy, Overunity, and Zero Point Energy has corrupted your thoughts because the device is............ so easy you will laugh

For starters your statement is incorrect Lenz's Law is actually a blessing, you need to wrap your head around that first. Let's review Lenz quickly



Quote

An induced electromotive force always gives rise to a current whose magnetic field opposes the change in original magnetic flux.




All of you globally have missed the key word in that statement, you are too quick to denounce Lenz's Law as the culprit, the destroyer of energy. However, if I highlight just one word in that statement we open up a new method of utilizing Lenz's Law.



Quote

An induced electromotive force always gives rise to a current whose magnetic field opposes the change in original magnetic flux.




So the beauty is, if I create a magnetic field in a coil with some current NATURE rewards me with a duplicate magnetic field that opposes mine. Already I got something for almost nothing. (BTW... that's my first Primary coil usage, to create a Lenz induced field)

So I now have a Primary magnetic field that gave rise to an induced magnetic field as stated by Lenz. Pay close attention here, this is important! Now take another coil (call it Primary 2) and feed your Lenz induced magnetic field so you complement its growth. So in other words your North pole of Primary 2 faces the South pole of Lenz field (or Vice Versa). Because Lenz is only present in change of original magnetic flux. Are you starting to see? Lenz has no interest in my second Primary because Primary 1 is the parent of Lenz induced field. You really need to appreciate how powerful that statement is. Ignore what has been written in any other thread that talks about these devices, lots of people using big words and way to complex algorithms to build something a child can assemble. 

So do you now understand why Barbosa and Leal explain in their patent the pole of the induced complements the primary pole? Do you now understand why that guy Tariel says........ it's so easy you will laugh, see why Clemente Figuera said "this is like the egg of Columbus". Because it really is that silly and simple, you simply feed the induced magnetic field with another magnetic field. There is no Lenz that opposes Primary 2, Primary 2 doesn't create an induced field (if you time it right) it ADDS to what has already been induced from P1. The result is a strong Rectified Magnetic field. That is your resonator, not so glamorous now that you know how everyone including Steve Mark pull this off. I apologies if you where looking for something more complex or other worldly. Unfortunately many of you will still be looking for a more complex solution because your mind will never accept such a simple solution to a problem that had you perplexed for years.

That is the theory behind the how it works some of you are smart enough to figure out the build details, but I will get you started. You are going to wind you primary's like a Poly-Phase motor (Yep a Tesla invention) take special note that a capacitor is used to delay a phase (this is super cheap and EZ). These devices use impulses and you need to split the wave in half so diodes are used. So one coil is at its magnetic max while the other is not, also you need to split the wave between coils, so half wave per primary but that is why you are using diodes (or tubes if your that type of guy Steve). Timing is very critical between the coils, remember you are building a resonator and nothing more.

Like I said before, take some iron from a tire jack and cut the ends off. Get a C-clamp to close the ends and you have a simple core that allows for different coils. To extract you need a secondary but that is simple, wrap it around your low budget iron core, use a thick or thin secondary.

So its up to you and figure out if the primary's should be CW or CCW, shouldn't take that long. BTW... bifiler coil doesn't mean crap.  The beauty of this device is different inputs (voltage/frequency) changes the output and output varies based on type of coil. Start simple, low voltage and don't kill yourself. You have more in this post then you ever wanted.

One more thing, Tesla patent, 413,353 not glamorous and not your FE but excellent facts and my personal opinion is as close as it gets for Tesla. 

haven't taken the hacksaw to the tire iron yet

some fellows/members here are  getting ready
and it will happen in a dedicated thread when it does

end Quote

---------------------------------------

respectfully submitted
Chet K

PS
Note all investigations once started we be done in a dedicated thread here


PPS
where is Lanca IV
have missed him [I know he was zealous at times but many very good contributions [just sayin''']