Angular Gravity Machine (A question to NathanCoppedge)

[vineet_kiran]

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rxIRaJlTD4Y

Hi, this is similar.

Fantastic!!!  But why "still engineers are skeptic"?   Did anybody try to verify it?

It clearly implies that  the lever principle of  'Force X distance'  can lead to overunity by adjusting in time using horizontal (eccentric) and rotational movement with a lengthy vertical axis.

 

[AlanA]

@ burnit007

Yes it might be similar but nevertheless different to. The John Device is much simpler. But both are based on the same principle. On Youtube you can wath quite a lot of videos about the John Device. As he wants to have a patent for his inventions there are not so many information. It would be quite interesting if this inventions is really overunity. The inventor claims but that is not enough.
I personally think that the skinner device is the most promising invention.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gTWwp5qUY3U

[burnit0017]

Hi, when they did their calculations they only used the input to output values. They did not include all the power that was added at the input by the mechanical advantage and gravity. If they measured the torque at the output and tried to generate electricity then the story  would be different. They were playing math word games to grab headlines.

Thanks for the info.

[burnit0017]

Hi, I wonder if two solenoids was used to drive a scotch yoke to convert the reciprocating action to a circular motion would work to drive the device?

[burnit0017]

Hi, on the Skinner device, what is the reason for the top weight? Is it needed?