New Scalar Wave Detector and laws of Scalar Physics

[MasterPlaster]

I suddenly feel very stupid. There is only 1 post from wdjensen123 and that was on September 2014.
Clearly he must have revealed some un-spekable secret and was elimiated pronto!

[Belfior]

I suddenly feel very stupid. There is only 1 post from wdjensen123 and that was on September 2014.
Clearly he must have revealed some un-spekable secret and was elimiated pronto!

Not a good idea to reveal stuff like this in a country that has a NATO base in it. Well not a good idea anywhere! At least have the common decency to reveal all the principles and not just give vague list of your achievements and then go silent for what ever reason.

At least give us the measuring device!

[SolarLab]

F.Y.I.

Conrad <=> "So, I am looking for a clear description of a longitudinal (and/or scalar) wave sender and receiver."

Have a look through the posts found below; they might be of interest and value:

Start here - http://overunity.com/12736/kapanadze-cousin-dally-free-energy/msg516762/#msg516762
and review the next seven (7) pages (especially the last 2 or 3 pages) or so; you can skip the "troll" stuff,
if you wish, to save time.

Much of the work regarding Meyl, Handwerker, Jackson, et. al. was posted quite a few years
ago so a lot of the information has become obscure by now.

Sorry to hear your Meyl device didn't yield satisfactory results; others, including myself,
have had better luck. Driving the device with a good, matched, narrow pulse generator seemed to work a bit better.
Two of many examples:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fPV9Nmnt_VI
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Rj6rY7wgM0I

Not all, but some of the references are, as you would say "links to a mass of words (whatever they are
worth besides hot air)," but I'm sure you can appreciate teleporting a physical working device to you through
this thread would present a problem  (my Startrek Transporter is currently in the shop undergoing
Re-calibration!) - a poor attempt at humor I know. 

A general purpose, wide band, detector would be difficult to conceive because of the systems natural "selectivity." This
characteristic did not appear to lend itself to conventional radio tuning techniques although, if I recall correctly, there
was some hint. But that's as much as I know...

Much of the open source development and theory is still a "work in progress" however.
Good Luck

FIN

[sm0ky2]

The reason it is often considered WB, or UWB, is because the analysis
leads to the same results.
Consider the case when we analyze frequency and amplitude
vs the gradient of frequencies over space and time.
(applicable when the band gradient is greater than the combined wavelengths
   of the individual frequencies involved)
By introducing frequencies not present in the original signal


By standard analysis, we see here that the scalar energy is
the derivation of the sum of the differences of the WB set.
(this points to a logical fallacy in scalar theory observable in the time domain)


Scalar theory is an unnecessary manipulation of standard theory,
as the expanded view already covers this situation.




I have to agree with Conrad on this one.

[sm0ky2]

To understand what I am talking about,
Look at the data in the first video, and divide the change in voltage
over time, by the 220kHz deviation


The simplified matrix solution is 1 X 5
The deviation is caused by differences in impedance
introduced at the connection points
(and possibly other inconsistencies in design)


This entire system can be handled with standard theory
without the need for complex scalar mathematics.