Overunity.com Archives is Temporarily on Read Mode Only!



Free Energy will change the World - Free Energy will stop Climate Change - Free Energy will give us hope
and we will not surrender until free energy will be enabled all over the world, to power planes, cars, ships and trains.
Free energy will help the poor to become independent of needing expensive fuels.
So all in all Free energy will bring far more peace to the world than any other invention has already brought to the world.
Those beautiful words were written by Stefan Hartmann/Owner/Admin at overunity.com
Unfortunately now, Stefan Hartmann is very ill and He needs our help
Stefan wanted that I have all these massive data to get it back online
even being as ill as Stefan is, he transferred all databases and folders
that without his help, this Forum Archives would have never been published here
so, please, as the Webmaster and Creator of these Archives, I am asking that you help him
by making a donation on the Paypal Button above.
You can visit us or register at my main site at:
Overunity Machines Forum



Magnet Myths and Misconceptions

Started by hartiberlin, September 27, 2014, 05:54:29 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 18 Guests are viewing this topic.

Pirate88179

Quote from: tinman on January 16, 2015, 09:24:40 PM


If we drop a pebble into a bucket of water,do not the ripples form from the center and roll out toward the rim of the bucket,only to be deflected from the bucket and meet back in the middle?.




Tinman, the above example concerns both divergent and convergent waves.  Are you positing that magnetic waves might have both of these properties?

I am just asking as I do not know the answer.  I was just going with your bucket example above.

Thanks,

Bill
See the Joule thief Circuit Diagrams, etc. topic here:
http://www.overunity.com/index.php?topic=6942.0;topicseen

Cap-Z-ro

I have just responded to an email notification that the forum's designated arse kisser - the butt pirate - had posted...but his post is nowhere to be seen on my end.

We have another ou.com mystery here.

I am going to make a list of theories to account for the missing/invisible post of the forum's designated arse kisser.

Any thoughts or ideas are welcome...readers can PM me your guesses if privacy is a concern.

1.  Intervention by ADM Stefan (possibly a request by the forum's designated arse kisser to make it so I couldn't read his dull colorless mutterings anymore.

2.  The forum's designated arse kisser found a way to accomplish it himself.

3.  A Complaint was made to Stefan regarding the forum's designated arse kisser, who, through his conduct has besmirched the reputation of the Dull Colorless Society.

4.  The forum's designated arse kisser has now really put me on ignore...after lying about doing so earlier on.

5.  Only he is able to see his posts...possibly divine intervention.

Regards...


MileHigh

How about we all just stop cold and let Mark and Tinman have their discussion about magnetism?  At this point we are just spamming this thread called "Magnet Myths and Misconceptions" with nonsense.

MarkE

Quote from: tinman on January 16, 2015, 09:24:40 PM
If we drop a pebble into a bucket of water,do not the ripples form from the center and roll out toward the rim of the bucket,only to be deflected from the bucket and meet back in the middle?.
The problem with that analogy is that the water displaces from the middle in all directions.  The differential is between the point where the pebble strikes and everywhere else.  Here, you are showing that north and south form from nowhere, go away from each other when they are supposed to attract and come back to each other.  What is the basis for the singularity where they supposedly form and why do they go away from each other when they supposedly attract?
Quote
Did i not say some time back that by adding small PM's together the field strength grow"s?
So is that a yes on linear superposition?
Quote
We need to get away from electromagnets for the time being,as we wish to find a way to gather an electrical power from the two opposite charges within a PM. The electromagnet also has an electric field to contend with-dose a PM?.
Are you contending that the "magnetic wind" of an electromagnet is fundamentally different in its behavior than the "magnetic wind" of a permanent magnet?
Quote
Im not even remotely interested in electromagnets,as they consume power to carry out the same job to that of a PM that dose not consume any power. My work is based around a PM-not an electromagnet,and i get the feeling Mark that you are trying to turn left here,when im trying to go straight ahead.
That is not true with superconducting magnets.  They go on and on and on all by themselves.  I am trying to get clarity on your ideas so that we can get to a point where we have a testable hypothesis that we can run experiments against.
Quote

If we are to look at the static charge in the comb,are we to assume that the comb has a charge of only one potential?-is this the monopole equivalent?. Or is it the equivalent to that of a capacitor,where the two charges are sepperated by a dielectric(the air) and the paper is the opposite or neutral charge to that of the comb.
The comb, the air, and the paper are all dielectrics.  They are all capable of greatly resisting the flow of charge. 

Pirate88179

Quote from: MileHigh on January 16, 2015, 09:47:42 PM
How about we all just stop cold and let Mark and Tinman have their discussion about magnetism?  At this point we are just spamming this thread called "Magnet Myths and Misconceptions" with nonsense.

MH:

Do you think it is possible that magnetic waves can be both divergent and convergent?  This is what caught my interest from Tinman's post.  What I mean is, that if there are really magnetic waves...why could they not perform like Tinman's bucket example?

I get what you mean by your post and, yes, it is getting very interesting now so I suppose I will just shut up and watch.

Bill
See the Joule thief Circuit Diagrams, etc. topic here:
http://www.overunity.com/index.php?topic=6942.0;topicseen