Magnet Myths and Misconceptions

[EMJunkie]

Howard Johnson went to his grave without ever closing the loop as he claimed and possibly even believed that he could.  You have completely failed to show supporting evidence for your loopy claims.  We can construct dipoles as large and in virtualy any aspect ratio you would like and you will not be able to use those to produce support for the "figure eight" idea, just as you have failed to do so up to this time.  I don't know who you may be trying to convince, because most of your audience seems to have given up on you and left.

Oil Company Troll - You're A FOOL!

[MarkE]

Oil Company Troll - You're A FOOL!

If you actually believed your gratuitous insults you would have to be feeling pretty bad considering that you have not been able to refute the physics that I and others have presented.

[tinman]

Howard Johnson went to his grave without ever closing the loop as he claimed and possibly even believed that he could.  You have completely failed to show supporting evidence for your loopy claims.  We can construct dipoles as large and in virtualy any aspect ratio you would like and you will not be able to use those to produce support for the "figure eight" idea, just as you have failed to do so up to this time.  I don't know who you may be trying to convince, because most of your audience seems to have given up on you and left.

Once again Mark, the figure 8 claim was mine, and at this point in time, I have seen more evidence to support that tan I have of the continual field from one pole to another. Once again, ca I you post a video showing the field being mapped?.

Cheers
Brad

[MarkE]

Once again Mark, the figure 8 claim was mine, and at this point in time, I have seen more evidence to support that tan I have of the continual field from one pole to another. Once again, ca I you post a video showing the field being mapped?.

Cheers
Brad

Tinman EMJUNKIE has been promoting the loopy Bloch wall in the middle of a permanent magnet idea.  He's just doing a bad put-on act.

I have posted static picture sequences of mapping with an ordinary compass.  I suppose that I could hook up an analog Hall effect sensor to provide more resolution.  However I do not see the point when it should be absolutely clear that the field is essentially dead parallel to the dipole at the center when the figure eight hypothesis requires that it curls towards the dipole in that region.  If it is a question of resolution, I have lots of bar magnets and could string together a rather long composite magnet, and there will still be zero inclination of the compass to point anywhere but parallel to that structure anywhere close to the middle.  So what would be satisfactory to you?  A dipole 10X the diameter of the compass which is about what I've shown, or 20X or 50X?

[EMJunkie]

If you actually believed your gratuitous insults you would have to be feeling pretty bad considering that you have not been able to refute the physics that I and others have presented.

Just stating another fact MarkE - by definition, You are a Fool!

I feel good to be honest, good that I have come in to this forum and had the ammo to blow your BAD SCIENCE out of the water.

I have provided all you asked, then you denied it! Youre a FOOL!

Village Idiot and lunatic

Kind Regards

  Chris Sykes

P.S:

adjective
informal

adjective: fool
1. foolish; silly.

verb fool; 3rd person present: fools; past tense: fooled; past participle: fooled; gerund or present participle: fooling
1. trick or deceive (someone); dupe.
"don't be fooled into paying out any more of your hard-earned cash"

synonyms: deceive, trick, play a trick on, hoax, dupe, take in, mislead, delude, hoodwink, bluff, beguile, gull