Overunity.com Archives is Temporarily on Read Mode Only!



Free Energy will change the World - Free Energy will stop Climate Change - Free Energy will give us hope
and we will not surrender until free energy will be enabled all over the world, to power planes, cars, ships and trains.
Free energy will help the poor to become independent of needing expensive fuels.
So all in all Free energy will bring far more peace to the world than any other invention has already brought to the world.
Those beautiful words were written by Stefan Hartmann/Owner/Admin at overunity.com
Unfortunately now, Stefan Hartmann is very ill and He needs our help
Stefan wanted that I have all these massive data to get it back online
even being as ill as Stefan is, he transferred all databases and folders
that without his help, this Forum Archives would have never been published here
so, please, as the Webmaster and Creator of these Archives, I am asking that you help him
by making a donation on the Paypal Button above.
You can visit us or register at my main site at:
Overunity Machines Forum



Magnet Myths and Misconceptions

Started by hartiberlin, September 27, 2014, 05:54:29 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 31 Guests are viewing this topic.

tinman

Quote from: MarkE on January 09, 2015, 09:35:51 PM
  If the figure eight idea is correct then there should be a big increase in flux density close to the dipole center.  It should manifest as two peaks of opposing polarity.YesYesYesYesYes, moving from N-S the flux density through the sensor will first exhibit a peak that is opposing magnetic polarity from near the north pole on the same side of the magnet, and then moving a little closer to the south pole it should exhibit a second peak in the same magnetic polarity as near the north pole on the same side of the magnet.No.  Near the ends of the magnet where there is lots of curl, there will be substantial flux, and therefore flux density that is perpendicular to the dipole axis and registered by the senosr.  The sensor should read just as the diagrams I posted indicate.  Near the middle of the magnet where all the flux lines become parallel the perpendicular flux, and therefore flux density is zero.  A plot of the sensor output will be a non-linear, but monotonic line moving along from one end of the magnet to the other.
What a lot of crap Mark.Are you now telling TK how to run this test so as it shows your uniform field from one end to another?.
Quote:- If the figure eight idea is correct then there should be a big increase in flux density close to the dipole center.
Bullshit. There should be a decrease as the two opposite fields cancel each other out.

Quote:- A plot of the sensor output will be a non-linear, but monotonic line moving along from one end of the magnet to the other.
And why would it be non-linear if this field is suppose to be parallel to the dipole.

If this parallel field dose not change from one end to the other of the dipole,then neither should the readings from the hall sensor. If there is a change as i am saying,then the hall sensor will pick up that change near the center of the dipole.

@TK
I have said nothing in support of this bloch wall crap,and i am fully aware that a bloch wall dose NOT exist at the center of the dipole. If we face two north fields together from two magnet's,and place a steel bar between those two apposing fields,then you will have what might represent a bloch wall,as the domains now are facing opposite directions-are not aligned.

tinman

Quote from: synchro1 on January 09, 2015, 09:53:31 PM
@TinselKoala,

You're straight out of a tale from Charles Dickens you miserly thread ball Scrooge! Get a job!
Bad form psycho-i mean synchro.
You have no idea of TK's position, so how the hell can you make a stupid statement like that.

MileHigh

A stack of disk magnets would be perfectly acceptable.  Heck, even a single cylinder magnet that makes nice flush contact with a long iron rod would be a pretty good substitute for the real thing.

Or perhaps on second thought, a long iron rod with mating cylindrical magnets on each end.  The art of cheating.  lol

synchro1

Dimensions: 1/2" x 1/4" x 1" thick
Tolerances: ±0.004" x ±0.004" x ±0.004"
Material: NdFeB, Grade N42
Plating/Coating: Ni-Cu-Ni (Nickel)
Magnetization Direction: Thru Thickness
Weight: 0.54 oz. (15.4 g)
Pull Force, Case 1: 10.54 lbs
Pull Force, Case 2: 10.54 lbs
Surface Field: 6474 Gauss
Max Operating Temp: 176ºF (80ºC)
Brmax: 13,200 Gauss
BHmax: 42 MGOe

The B84X0 is what many people commonly refer to as a "bar" magnet, as it is magnetized through the 1" dimension.  The poles are located on the smallest ends, so they behave like the old fashioned alnico bar magnets that have been used in school demonstrations. 


Price: $4.05

Shipping costs for this 1/2 oz magnet may put poor TK in dire straits!

tinman

Here is a really simple experiment. Lets just take a reed switch,LED and a 2.5 volt power source.Hook all in series,and then run the reed switch along the length of the magnet. If the LED stays on,then there is a magnetic field,if it go's out near the center of the dipole,then there is no magnetic field.

How dose a reed switch work-Quote wikipedia- The reed switch is an electrical switch operated by an applied magnetic field. It was invented at Bell Telephone Laboratories in 1936 by W. B. Ellwood. It consists of a pair of contacts on ferrous metal reeds in a hermetically sealed glass envelope. The contacts may be normally open, closing when a magnetic field is present,