Overunity.com Archives is Temporarily on Read Mode Only!



Free Energy will change the World - Free Energy will stop Climate Change - Free Energy will give us hope
and we will not surrender until free energy will be enabled all over the world, to power planes, cars, ships and trains.
Free energy will help the poor to become independent of needing expensive fuels.
So all in all Free energy will bring far more peace to the world than any other invention has already brought to the world.
Those beautiful words were written by Stefan Hartmann/Owner/Admin at overunity.com
Unfortunately now, Stefan Hartmann is very ill and He needs our help
Stefan wanted that I have all these massive data to get it back online
even being as ill as Stefan is, he transferred all databases and folders
that without his help, this Forum Archives would have never been published here
so, please, as the Webmaster and Creator of these Archives, I am asking that you help him
by making a donation on the Paypal Button above.
You can visit us or register at my main site at:
Overunity Machines Forum



Magnet Myths and Misconceptions

Started by hartiberlin, September 27, 2014, 05:54:29 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 64 Guests are viewing this topic.

MileHigh

You are caving and clutching at straws.  You are even copying what I am saying about you and trying to say it about me.

Chris, I said "v = L di/dt" to you and got a virtual blank stare back from you.  The jig is up.

EMJunkie

Quote from: TinselKoala on January 13, 2015, 12:18:34 AM
Did you even bother to read the article in your reference, or the original article in Nature? Of course you did not, or you wouldn't be posting the link here... SINCE IT REFUTES YOUR CLAIM and more especially ... the original article was written by people who fully endorse the conventional picture of _magnetic field lines_ .
Why don't you sent the authors an email, asking whether the conventional picture or the "peanut waist" picture is correct.  I know why not, and so does everyone else reading here.

Here's a little quote from the article you linked:
So, we can see very clearly that you have MISREPRESENTED what is contained in the PhysicsWorld article and the actual paper in Nature to which it refers.

TinselKoala - Your Assumption! I am claiming nothing here, you MileHigh and MarkE are.

I don't doubt Science! I doubt Conventional Science that has been proven Wrong by Modern Science!!!

If it does not hold, then its wrong!

Physics Professors today are always saying the same thing, well this holds for this but not for that.

TK - you seriously need to think outside the box. I have been here under different name for some 10 years odd and you were here back then!!! What's going on, not gotten any further ahead!!! Got nothing STILL!

Your posts are like MileHighs, nothing but criticism and Bull Dust! You like MileHigh will still be here in another 10 years and will still have NOTHING!!!!

I have seen some of your experiment, your ability to "DO" is not the problem, its your Intellectual HandiCap!!!

I bet you do the same experiments all day long! Same ones, day after day, looking for something but blind to whats right infront of your face!

TK - You used to have my respect. But do you know what, Youre just an overunity.com number! Today that number is: 11167 - This number is definitely not showing your Intelligence!

So, to answer your stupidity, yes I did read the article! What does it mean to have a Mono Pole sitting in free space? Do you want me to spell this for you? MONOPOLE, MONOPOLE, MONOPOLE

OMG HOW sparse is this field!!!

allcanadian

@MH
QuoteWe never even saw AC's setup.  There is no reason that the picture I plucked off of Google Images would have the same response as AC's magnet.  Nor was there even a response curve shown, I just showed a picture.  So how can you "compare response curves" when there wasn't even two response curves to compare?  On top of that, we have no clue how consistently AC moved the Hall sensor along the magnet and the data he posted showed a time base.


Good point, I used a plastic straight edge and moved my probe at as uniform a speed as possible. In the other plot I held the probe in a clamp then used two pieces of plastic around the center to spin it perpendicular to the NS axis.


I'm still working on the new setup which I will run by you guys now. I built a new probe with two linear ratiometric hall sensors 90 deg apart to capture the probe x,y axis (vertical,horizontal sensors). The probe output goes to my Arduino/Labview interface where I then plot two separate xy intensity graphs(vertical/horizontal probe) with a third xy intensity graph representing the difference between the two.


The xy intensity graph simply uses the probe position, xy coordinates, and the probe output y to plot a 2D picture with the probe value y determining the color of each point. I'm using a linear servo arrangement my interface controls to scan line by line within a 3" x 3" area with a resolution of 1023 x 1023 points. So we should have a pretty solid picture of both the x and y axis of the probe output as well as the difference between the two.


This is just speculation but I'm hoping to see a line where the probe xy values sum to zero which should be obvious in the third graph. If probe rotation was showing this then this arrangement should prove it in my opinion. All this debate about what people think is wonderful however I want to know for myself.


AC
Knowledge without Use and Expression is a vain thing, bringing no good to its possessor, or to the race.

EMJunkie

Quote from: MileHigh on January 13, 2015, 12:28:50 AM
You are caving and clutching at straws.  You are even copying what I am saying about you and trying to say it about me.

Chris, I said "v = L di/dt" to you and got a virtual blank stare back from you.  The jig is up.

Hahahaha - Milehigh, You have a fantastic ability at copy paste, maybe the Oil Companies should deduct from your letter for letter pay check! I think you should ring and re-negotiate a deal with them! Quick, before they find out!


MarkE

Quote from: EMJunkie on January 13, 2015, 12:07:00 AM
MarkE - Is It? Is it Really? Who do you work for, BP is British Petroleum you know! Or is it BP BS Inc?
EMJ it really reflects poorly on you that you deliberately spread disparging lies.  Is that something exclusive to your internet behavior or do you go around doing that to:  your coworkers, your neighbors, and your family as well?