Overunity.com Archives is Temporarily on Read Mode Only!



Free Energy will change the World - Free Energy will stop Climate Change - Free Energy will give us hope
and we will not surrender until free energy will be enabled all over the world, to power planes, cars, ships and trains.
Free energy will help the poor to become independent of needing expensive fuels.
So all in all Free energy will bring far more peace to the world than any other invention has already brought to the world.
Those beautiful words were written by Stefan Hartmann/Owner/Admin at overunity.com
Unfortunately now, Stefan Hartmann is very ill and He needs our help
Stefan wanted that I have all these massive data to get it back online
even being as ill as Stefan is, he transferred all databases and folders
that without his help, this Forum Archives would have never been published here
so, please, as the Webmaster and Creator of these Archives, I am asking that you help him
by making a donation on the Paypal Button above.
You can visit us or register at my main site at:
Overunity Machines Forum



Nuclear Resonat Battery test soon to come

Started by pomodoro, September 28, 2014, 08:06:59 AM

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Print
Go Down Pages 1 ... 10 11 12 13 14 ... 18
User actions

profitis

#55
October 02, 2014, 03:31:50 AM
Rubidium takes a month to fog a photographic film.uranium takes a few hours.2Ag + I2 >< 2AgI + energy

pomodoro

#56
October 02, 2014, 04:25:52 AM
When I finish this Moray stuff I might have a look. I need to concentrate on this. Lots do do here first. Here is the next coil /cap combo. Seems a lot better, but still loses too much too quickly. Picture shows 7000v dumped into coil. Switching by hand or by spark gap makes little difference in the decay.

I'd like to get the Q considerably higher before I paint it with uranium.

profitis

#57
October 02, 2014, 04:39:51 AM
Why wait pomodoro? Let us calculate the ratio of particle loss emitted from uranium vs the faraday gain from split silver iodide in a day on a photographic plate.I'l put my money on it being around 30 000 - 1.realisticly speaking,this is the best way to go.and it falls in line with laws of physics,even the 2nd law

profitis

#58
October 02, 2014, 05:40:13 AM
This type of photogalvanic cell will undoubtedly work if we are to believe in marie curies infamous photographic plate experiment.it will convert maybe 30%(compare to betavoltaics 2%) uranium's natural radioactivity to electricity.

pomodoro

#59
October 02, 2014, 07:02:03 AM
I'm no good at multitasking, so profitis, by all means research that cell and keep notes. When I've exhausted the Moray/Brown ideas then I might move on to this cell.  A problem with this cell of yours is that nitrate is consumed and cell will foul up with nitrite. Anyway be useful on the current topic please - what is the best way to plate the copper coil or silver plated coil with uranium. I want to plate the outside of it with a thin uranium plate.

I need to improve the Q of the LC combo and make it a very reproducible setup. a Q or 100+ is what I'm after.  I could silver plate the coil but I need to make sure it is the coil that is being inefficient. It could well be the spark that occurs as the coil and capacitor leads are brought together.
The LC circuit will be tested both with high voltage/huge current  (as Brown used) and also with Kator's Q measuring system as in the  pdf.  If the alpha particles do increase the Q with uranium, then there is a strong chance that radium could have not only increased the Q but also allowed continuous oscillation. 
This is the first time I've heard of anyone actually trying this and not just regurgitating theories. 
Print
Go Up Pages 1 ... 10 11 12 13 14 ... 18
User actions