New Rossi LENR interview

[TinselKoala]

Tinsel
So ultimately your claiming Rossi pulled a switcheroo in the Lab,
like a mission impossible episode .


this is the Level of scrutiny which begs  a higher skill level from Profitis ?


Chet

You do like to misrepresent stuff don't you.
What I am "claiming" or rather simply pointing out, is that
1. The Lugano demonstration was NOT INDEPENDENT since the reactor was loaded by ROSSI, the power was applied by ROSSI, and ROSSI prevented the dummy run from being a proper control, and ROSSI unloaded the reactor and obtained the sample of ash.
2. The patent claims NI62 is the fuel and copper the ash. The Lugano claimed demonstration resulted in NI62 in the "ash" and no copper.
3. Rossi is known to have purchased a commercial sample of NI62 before the demonstration.
4. No valid data has been presented that indicates excess heat from the device over and above what was supplied by the electrical heating coils. Several lines of evidence prove that the reactor never actually attained the 1400 degree temperature they claimed, such as the total NON_CHARRING of the paint of the supporting framework. There are other proofs in the report as well, such as the non-molten Inconel heating wires.
5. The most likely explanation for the presence of the NI62... of the exact composition as the purchased sample .... winding up in the "ash" sample collected by Rossi is that it is part of the purchased sample, not something created by or even used as fuel by the "reactor."

Would anyone like to dispute these FACTS? Or would you rather continue insulting me in an attempt to divert attention from the Rossi fraud?

[TinselKoala]

Electrochemistry was the beginning of pons-lenr and electrochemistry was the endup of nickel-lenr so I think I'm damn suited to tackle this one mr tinselkeizen.let's go to basics first,as rossi and many others said before,nuke reactions are a side-effect of a quantum phenomena so lets start with textbook-literature basics and put the horse(catalyst spillover) before the cart(nuke disintergration).let's go to rossis earlier patent http://ecatnews.com/?p=829 where he had a copper tube with nickel coating on the inside .do you agree with me that hydrogen spillover between nickel and copper is scientific fact mr tinselkoala.please go here http://frigidaflamma.blogspot.nl/2011/06/copper-with-nickel-in-rossi-e-cat.html?m=1

I see you do not read the materials I suggest to you, so why should I bother to read what you present? The way real systems behave is irrelevant to the Rossi affair, since his system does not produce any excess heat over what is provided by the electrical power input. None of them have ever done so.

[profitis]

There are ways to experimentaly check if hydrogen spillover between nickel and copper is reversable quantum 2lot violating phenomena thus there are ways to check if rossis cupro-nickel ecat or any ecat is a real 2lot violator.

[MarkE]

Profitis there are also ways to see what's stuck on the bottom of one's sandals. 

Of the many outlandish claims that the fraud Rossi has made, Second Law violations are not among them.

[profitis]

Plenty indication here markE http://www.e-catworld.com/2014/08/10/rossi-lets-switch-from-lenr-to-quar/ .also check out this discussion on vortex-l https://www.mail-archive.com/vortex-l@eskimo.com/msg92712.html where the genius jones beene dives into spillover physics. Its very simple catalytic spillover is cyclical as was shown by sheehan et al.can you imagine the heat generated by hydrogen winds going cyclical at 500+ degrees celcius.very very hot