Overunity.com Archives is Temporarily on Read Mode Only!



Free Energy will change the World - Free Energy will stop Climate Change - Free Energy will give us hope
and we will not surrender until free energy will be enabled all over the world, to power planes, cars, ships and trains.
Free energy will help the poor to become independent of needing expensive fuels.
So all in all Free energy will bring far more peace to the world than any other invention has already brought to the world.
Those beautiful words were written by Stefan Hartmann/Owner/Admin at overunity.com
Unfortunately now, Stefan Hartmann is very ill and He needs our help
Stefan wanted that I have all these massive data to get it back online
even being as ill as Stefan is, he transferred all databases and folders
that without his help, this Forum Archives would have never been published here
so, please, as the Webmaster and Creator of these Archives, I am asking that you help him
by making a donation on the Paypal Button above.
You can visit us or register at my main site at:
Overunity Machines Forum



The new generator no effect counter B. EMF part 2 ( Selfrunning )

Started by syairchairun, November 09, 2014, 09:05:00 AM

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 13 Guests are viewing this topic.

l0stf0x

Quote from: T-1000 on November 20, 2014, 05:52:14 AM
The placement of magnets can be done on same way as cores in center of fan motor. The rest of things are same as in http://www.overunityresearch.com/index.php?topic=2678.msg43230#msg43230

P.S> The holding metal for magnets in the center should be nonmagnetic to avoid weakening the magnetic field strength of magnets...

magnet holder will be teflon and center stable bar will be aluminum (I hope)

Sure can be as core. just 2 poles NS. I ll test that option too.

Also the magnets can be in two rows: 24 and 24 and be like:

nsnsnsnsnsns...
snsnsnsnsnsn...

or be 3 or 4 rows...


Syairchairun also states that he used 160 magnets 

""10*12*80 mm neody magnt, any 40 streets magnet NSNSNSNS""

so he probably use this 4 rows setup..

nsnsnsnsnsns...
snsnsnsnsnsn...
nsnsnsnsnsns...
snsnsnsnsnsn...

Who knows.. we need to test it by our selfs I guess




T-1000

Quote from: l0stf0x on November 20, 2014, 06:37:44 AM
Also the magnets can be in two rows: 24 and 24 and be like:

nsnsnsnsnsns...
snsnsnsnsnsn...

or be 3 or 4 rows...


Syairchairun also states that he used 160 magnets 

""10*12*80 mm neody magnt, any 40 streets magnet NSNSNSNS""

so he probably use this 4 rows setup..

nsnsnsnsnsns...
snsnsnsnsnsn...
nsnsnsnsnsns...
snsnsnsnsnsn...

Who knows.. we need to test it by our selfs I guess
The number of magnets = number of coil cores (then multiply to cover entire heigh of coil cores). The neighborhood magnet in opposite polarity over circle and the most possible placement is in middle between 2 coil cores (due original alternator design) so the spinning core would extend magnetic field and shorten it to each coil core in the edge.

If the placement of coil cores are too tight the number of magnets= number of coil cores / 2...

The spinning iron core makes temporary magnet from itself when passes between magnet and generator coil under load. So making bloch wall right in the middle of spinning core should make less drag as possible.

lumen

Hmm, complications.
Who would have thought there is so much missing from this simple concept.

l0stf0x

Quote from: T-1000 on November 20, 2014, 06:45:01 AM
The number of magnets = number of coil cores (then multiply to cover entire heigh of coil cores). The neighborhood magnet in opposite polarity over circle and the most possible placement is in middle between 2 coil cores (due original alternator design) so the spinning core would extend magnetic field and shorten it to each coil core in the edge.

If the placement of coil cores are too tight the number of magnets= number of coil cores / 2...

The spinning iron core makes temporary magnet from itself when passes between magnet and generator coil under load. So making bloch wall right in the middle of spinning core should make less drag as possible.

Exactly! Thanks T-1000, when I ll get close to that state, I ll post pictures of progress.

I plan to not use laminated steel as magnetic shield because is too much trouble and need lots of width for the screws. Actually I test laminated shield of 100mm width with magnet and soft steel of 5mm and the passing field was almost the same. (measuring the distance with attracted steel)The difference is less than 0.5mm.

So I plan to cut a peace of steel tube/pipe 5mm, longer than the lenth of the coil core complex but of exact diameter (leaving 1mm space from coil cores).. and open 4 windows
At the top and bottom of the pipe will be inserted the aluminum disks (on ball bearings) and secured with screws.

FatBird

It looks like Prototypes could be OPEN FRAME just to try things out.


                                                                    .