Can You solve below problem?

[tesla2]

http://4.bp.blogspot.com/-j-em23WjKB8/VGibxjeU5cI/AAAAAAAACHU/XD_h6LJO2H4/s1600/pl.jpg


Why the same mass m is more heavy ?

Moon ---->V1
i
i
R distance
i
i
Earth 
Moon = Earth's  Satellite  / radial force  Fr = M*V1*V1 /R

m
T
O
W  (r) distance
E
R
Earth

MAROSZ ( me )
  EACH MASS m = Earth's satellite. Mass m is able start feel the same force what Moon !    Fr = m*V*V /r.

Please speed up Moon = Moon will escape to more high obrbite
Please speed up mass m  


RADIAL FORCES ARE ABLE REDIRECT ENERGY !!!

IN UNIVERSE EXIST MANY OBJECTS
MORE WIDE Q Equation ...
Q equation must contain "N"objects and "N" speed and "N" forces

Each Vector V can be exchange for many small vectors "Vn" ( 3D directions )

V = v1+v2+v3....................+vn
each v1,v2...vn represent perpendicular direction
to some object N in universe
EACH MASS m = Satellite  for  "N " objects in space

http://1.bp.blogspot.com/-YrUvn5DtJbs/VBVMugI-61I/AAAAAAAAB_A/QmzLUbz-qoY/s1600/CIMG3325.JPG


http://2.bp.blogspot.com/-iNHYy6u9bRg/VF9En99DNmI/AAAAAAAACFA/vOX3fZYchx4/s1600/em.jpg

Alone in home I wrote new physics
http://maroszphysics.blogspot.com/

[TinselKoala]

Please explain how, using only OLD PHYSICS that contradict your "new physics"... how did ESA manage to rendezvous with a comet, after ten years of navigation, and place a probe in orbit around the comet, and then soft-land (relatively) a probe on that comet? No "new physics" were involved in that tremendous feat of gravitational navigation. Unless your "new physics" can explain and account fully for what we already know to be true... it fails.

How did the Cassini mission manage to find its way to Saturn, and soft-land a probe on Titan, using only standard Newtonian gravitaton and the normal, well understood, old physics of orbital dynamics? Please explain how this was done, using your "new physics". If you cannot.... your "new physics" fails.

Please demonstrate that your "new physics" predicts some behaviour that is not predicted by the "old physics" and then demonstrate the accuracy of your "new physics" prediction by performing an experiment or demonstration. Also, please indicate where I may find an actual scientific paper published in a peer-reviewed journal describing your "new physics". If you cannot ... well then we may draw some conclusions about your "new physics".

[tesla2]

You like Einstein ?

two pictures and You will not like him

Ball = Earth's satellite !
http://3.bp.blogspot.com/-d8DiJWymeX8/VGkcpOulznI/AAAAAAAACH0/bLFovEWtcWI/s1600/tow.jpg

Einstein
http://1.bp.blogspot.com/-jIKPBonOu-Q/VAgKnhFHZKI/AAAAAAAAB8M/OMrX6H91ULg/s1600/12.gif


MACH THEY ARE  USING MACH not EINSTEIN 
RADIAL FORCES ARE ABLE REDIRECT ENERGY WITHOUT
REACTION !!! ( SMART PEOPLE UNDERSTAND WHAT IT MEAN - we not speak about free free energy : )

[tesla2]

m=m

but Q ?

http://4.bp.blogspot.com/-j-em23WjKB8/VGibxjeU5cI/AAAAAAAACHU/XD_h6LJO2H4/s1600/pl.jpg

[tesla2]

LIGHT IS ABLE PUSH AIR  DURING TEST (IMPORTANT )
> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Solar_sail

Michelson Morley Classical Mechanic  ( very high level imagination  )
http://2.bp.blogspot.com/-pf0vOT4PC_4/VGmOcWetogI/AAAAAAAACIE/EKZLO2RHCIQ/s1600/3.jpg


YOU WANT TO SPEAK WITH ME ABOUT PHYSICS ...

mV = mV  ??
http://maroszphysics.blogspot.com