Vaccinations; recent developments

[Magluvin]

It's kind of cute when people say things like "don't be so quick" - when the vast majority of funds funneled into pharmaceuticals are for safety testing.What would be the moral issue here exactly?  It's not like a fetus was aborted for the purpose of being used here.  It not like it's perpetuating some market for aborted fetuses. This is what logicians refer to as a "conjoined question"In other words she believes that there is sufficient amounts of free DNA which will insert itself into your genome.  You realize that you consume a considerable amount of human DNA every day.  Probably some tiny fraction gets into your blood stream.  So perhaps the argument rests on some idea that this is "special DNA" if so they don't really tell you what is special about it.

Her desire for completely unvaccinated research is disappointing because it tells me that for all her schooling she didn't take statistics.

"It's kind of cute when people say things like "don't be so quick" - when the vast majority of funds funneled into pharmaceuticals are for safety testing.What would be the moral issue here exactly?"

Yeah. Sure they are. And it should be accepted as fact since you say so. 


"It's not like a fetus was aborted for the purpose of being used here.  It not like it's perpetuating some market for aborted fetuses.

Its not like???       The push for so called "womens health" and the pro abortion fight is just that. A push to get body parts from 'BABIES". You will burn one day for supporting this.


" This is what logicians refer to as a "conjoined question"In other words she believes that there is sufficient amounts of free DNA which will insert itself into your genome.  You realize that you consume a considerable amount of human DNA every day."

Yeah. Like in Pepsi cola?  Now why would we want aborted baby ANYTHING in a soft drink?


"Her desire for completely unvaccinated research is disappointing because it tells me that for all her schooling she didn't take statistics."

Bash Bash Bash.

Mags

[sarkeіzen]

Yeah. Sure they are. And it should be accepted as fact since you say so.

Nope because of math.  See the money it takes to bring pharmaceuticals to market is mostly bound up in testing (after a drug is brought to market this much or more money is spent on marketing).  Efficacy testing is always going to require significantly smaller samples than safety testing.  Do you know why?  I'm willing to bet that you don't.

Also if you actually paid attention to what drug manufacturers are actually lobbying for you would see this as well.

Its not like???

Nobody asked someone to abort this particular fetus in order to harvest it's lung cells exactly once.  QED.  Your imagined "baby harvesting conspiracy" is an entirely different subject perhaps more appropriately brought up with your therapist.

Yeah

Glad you agree.  Keep on frothing at the mouth there crazy boy.

Bash Bash Bash.

It's simply math again.  Either vaccines represent an absolute certainty or they represent a risk.  If the later then you would see a dose/response relationship.  Hence completely unvaccinated studies are not necessary and generally speaking would be of lower power.

[SeaMonkey]

See the money it takes to bring pharmaceuticals to market is mostly bound up in testing (after a drug is brought to market this much or more money is spent on marketing).  Efficacy testing is always going to require significantly smaller samples than safety testing.

Do you know why?  I'm willing to bet that you don't.

Also if you actually paid attention to what drug manufacturers are actually lobbying for you would see this as well.

Nobody asked someone to abort this particular fetus in order to harvest it's lung cells.  QED.Glad you agree.  Keep on frothing at the mouth there crazy boy.It's simply math again.  Either vaccines represent an absolute certainty or they represent a risk.  If the later then you would see a dose/response relationship.  Hence completely unvaccinated studies are not necessary and generally speaking would be of lower power.

Sark, your postings are very revealing.

It is very clear that you know nothing about the pharmaceutical
industry; that you've never been party to any of their gyrations.

You've been programmed to bolster an AGENDA which you
really have no understanding of.  Your motive is naught
more than personal glorification and self gratification with
a serious lust for lucre.

Try as you might you're not making progress in your operation
of disinformation.  TRUTH is becoming ever more popular with
the gradually awakening populace.

[sarkeіzen]

Sark, your postings are very revealing.

Your narrative device is kind of obvious don't you think?  You just cast vague aspersions that some larger context exists which is different than the evidence presented. :-)  Cheap carny tricks.

My posts merely state what evidence rather clearly indicates.  It's kind of amusing to see you're still fabricating your own narrative either as part of your trolling agenda and/or feeding your delusions though.

[SeaMonkey]

Sark, your pathetically desperate replies reveal much too.

Vaccination Victory!