Selfrunning Free Energy Permanent Magnet Motor - The Simon Magnet Motor motor

[MagnaProp]

Interesting to see it move. I notice some similarities to the Howard Johnson designs and some others I've come across which may have a chance of working.

[tiquila77]

MagnaProp, I don't think the Simon Magnet motor is similar to the Howard Johnson Magnet Motor(HJMM) or any other permanent magnet motors(PMM).

Here's my reason: Majority of the PMM, including the HJMM, use Asymmetrical Regauging(AR) to produce continuous rotation; this is the major reason non of these motors has been able to achieve a COP that tends to infinity.

Asymmetrical regauging is defined as any process that CHANGES the POTENTIAL ENERGY of a system and produces a net force in the process. From the definition, and from the way most PMM operate, we see that the potential energy does not tend to infinity; we also see that most PMM require refuelling or regauging of their potential energy to operate continuously.

The Simon Magnet Motor(SMM) doesnt use asymmetrical regauging; for it doesnt regauge its magnetic potential energy. In the SMM, the stator permanent magnets are perpetually "running toward the rotor permanent magnet."

[MagnaProp]

The similarity I see is the orientation of the magnetic poles. Looks exactly the same to me. I agree with your assessment that there is a difference between AR and SR being used in Howards motors and this one.

[shylo]

Hi folks,
I don't care how you arrange 2 or 200 magnetic fields , they will find a balance point.
Shielding will just offset the balance point.
The greater this force of balance is what needs to be manipulated.
2 magnets attracting ,..the closer they get , the stronger the attraction.
Introduce a third field at various angles, you can shear the force and use this to get propulsion.
But is it more than you put into shearing the field in the first place?
Everybody it seems , always work with 2 fields.
I'm looking into using multiple fields.
artv

[tiquila77]

You said, " I don't care how you arrange 2 or 200 magnetic fields , they will find a balance point".

You are wrong! A proper scrutiny of all those magnet assemblies that didnt work or that didnt produce any overunity effect, one would see that they all have one thing in common: they were designed to use asymmetrical regauging(AR). The systems all have accelerating and decelerating forces which cancel out each other; as a result the systems have to regauge their magnetic potential energies to function continuously.

You also said, " Introduce a third field at various angles, you can shear the force and use this to get propulsion. But is it more than you put into shearing the field in the first
place?"

Perhaps you were asking whether the available magnetic potential energy(MPE) is more than the work done in assembling the magnets. If that's your question, here's the answer: Yes the MPE is more than the work done to assemble the magnets; it is so becauase there's no conservation-of-work law in nature. That is, one can either do less work and get more energy or do more work and get less energy...