Lenz free generator

[i_ron]

Barbosi... what an interesting handle. Google translates best guess is that it is Romanian for "bearded"


In english bearded can mean "hidden", are you using it in this context? very clever!


Ron

[barbosi]

Yeah google does a poor job for a number of known languages: celtic, kannada, cree, manding, not to mention sanskrit.

What I find fascinating is "if we can decrease (with a magnet as an example) the inductance of a coil, where does that inductance go?" (Google cannot deliver an answer to that either and yet, they boast about driverless cars).

It's like a fat dude does some physical exercises and lose some weight. Where all that weight goes?

Like a fat magnetic field collapses, where does it goes?

The conservation law formulated for a layman says: nothing is lost, nothing is gained, all is transformed.

So if we lose inductance, then the said inductance is transformed in what?
When a current flows into an inductance, it generates magnetic field and the said inductance is immersed in its own magnetic field. Hence, the value of inductance has a lower value.

With this "paradox" in mind, one cannot refrain to ask the question: " A transformer... what it transforms?" It is not just semantics, people of the past used words with great care so the true workings of an idea are not lost.

An example of lost meaning we have today in the word "capacitor" as opposed to "condenser" as it was used in the past. As one can understand that a pulley is something used to pull, it will be confused when it uses capacitor. It capacitates what? While a condenser... We all know what a condenser does in the workings of a fridge. Can be same principle valid in electric circuits?

Tesla showed in his pancake coil that a regular coil posses a "capacitance" which is greatly revealed in the coil that makes the subject of his invention. Nowadays we all know that wire, a pair of wires, even a metal sphere have a capacitance, they teach us formulas for those too.

Back to the transformer, is it possible that the changing magnetic field is transformed into something else using a "condensation" method?
If that is true, the so called mutual induction mentioned earlier by AC can be "confused" as a capacitive transfer of energy. Can anyone truly say the difference?

Regards

[i_ron]

Like a fat magnetic field collapses, where does it go?

Regards

Could it be that it goes back to the fourth dimension, from whence it came?


Ron
http://www.abovetopsecret.com/forum/thread1044169/pg1

[EMJunkie]

Yeah google does a poor job for a number of known languages: celtic, kannada, cree, manding, not to mention sanskrit.

What I find fascinating is "if we can decrease (with a magnet as an example) the inductance of a coil, where does that inductance go?" (Google cannot deliver an answer to that either and yet, they boast about driverless cars).

It's like a fat dude does some physical exercises and lose some weight. Where all that weight goes?

Like a fat magnetic field collapses, where does it goes?

The conservation law formulated for a layman says: nothing is lost, nothing is gained, all is transformed.

So if we lose inductance, then the said inductance is transformed in what?
When a current flows into an inductance, it generates magnetic field and the said inductance is immersed in its own magnetic field. Hence, the value of inductance has a lower value.

With this "paradox" in mind, one cannot refrain to ask the question: " A transformer... what it transforms?" It is not just semantics, people of the past used words with great care so the true workings of an idea are not lost.

An example of lost meaning we have today in the word "capacitor" as opposed to "condenser" as it was used in the past. As one can understand that a pulley is something used to pull, it will be confused when it uses capacitor. It capacitates what? While a condenser... We all know what a condenser does in the workings of a fridge. Can be same principle valid in electric circuits?

Tesla showed in his pancake coil that a regular coil posses a "capacitance" which is greatly revealed in the coil that makes the subject of his invention. Nowadays we all know that wire, a pair of wires, even a metal sphere have a capacitance, they teach us formulas for those too.

Back to the transformer, is it possible that the changing magnetic field is transformed into something else using a "condensation" method?
If that is true, the so called mutual induction mentioned earlier by AC can be "confused" as a capacitive transfer of energy. Can anyone truly say the difference?

Regards

WHAT!!!

Inductance is not like a Bag of Sugar Erfinder! What a complete bunch or Verbal Rubbish!!!

Take an Inductance Meter, connect to a scope, look at the signal, what do you see?

Mine is  239.7Hz @ 35% Duty Cycle

Why? What's the Signal DOING? What are we Measuring when we measure Inductance?

Does: "To Induce the potential for Charged Particles to Flow" make any sense?

A Coils Inductance is simply a "Value" - A "Value" indicating the Potential for Induced Current, which is a Charged Particle Flow. What does Charged Particle Flow Constitute? Yes a Magnetic Field!

You Have a LONG WAY to go before an understanding of these concepts are available to you Erfinder!


   Chris Sykes
       hyiq.org

[EMJunkie]

Ampere Turns (AT) = Turns (N) x Current (I) and Magnetomotive Force (MMF) = Turns (N) x Current (I) - As you can see the formula is the same. Ampere Turns is in Units of MMF.

In a Coil of Wire, with Turns (N) carrying Current (I) where the Current is Uniform and all moving in the same direction, what do you think the result would be? What would the effects of this Force be?

   Chris Sykes
       hyiq.org