Lenz free generator

[lancaIV]

                                A transformation of gases to liquid has just taken place.


                               a.  bond force,bond energy
                               b.  fission force,fission energy
                               
                                                 (a=b) : ? 


                            https://worldwide.espacenet.com/publicationDetails/biblio?DB=EPODOC&II=7&ND=3&adjacent=true&locale=en_EP&FT=D&date=19881020&CC=WO&NR=8808220A1&KC=A1


[Dolby(TM)]  surround photo(n) and phono(n) oscillation force-energy with electricity conversion (conversion: by enrichment or pooring)


                     "Big Bang" and "Ur-Soap" kitchen recipe,


                       physics defines the Nano-sub-atomar-chemistry process
                       included the homeopathical essence substance pooring(some kind of cracking)


                      from pathsearch to pathfind : positive or negative potenzieren also called dynamisieren
                      https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Homeopathic_dilutions
                                        Potency scales


                      homeopathic synfuels :
                      https://worldwide.espacenet.com/publicationDetails/biblio?DB=EPODOC&II=0&ND=3&adjacent=true&locale=en_EP&FT=D&date=19830330&CC=ZA&NR=8203054B&KC=B


citation: "Hence, one can say the REACTOR TO TRANSMUTE THE MATTER is an apparatus to produce calories For example, if 2,000 cal (two thousand kilo/calories) is introduced in the REACTOR it will be possible to multiply these calories by 100 (a hundred), 1,000 (a thousand) and even 100,000 (a hundred thousand) according to what it is chosen to be used. The only condition to have a progressive multi^plication of the calories without problems is to provide a cooling apparatus like the one used in combustion engines during operation. "                           citation end

[allcanadian]

@tinman

Lets take the highlighted,and look at that a bit closer--water as fuel.[/size]Water is 2 parts hydrogen,and one part oxygen--but it will not burn in the combined liquid state.What must happen before that water becomes fuel ?--yes,we must transform that liquid into two gases. When these two gases are ignited,it transforms back to it's original liquid state.A transformation of gases to liquid has just taken place.

An interesting observation.


We could also say water or H2O is simply two hydrogen atoms(particles and fields) bound to one oxygen atom(particles and fields) though their electro-magnetic fields.


To cause liquid H2O to become separate components such as H2 and O2 gasses we add energy which simply increases the space between the groups of charged particles we call atoms. For example if I had two red balls(H2) and one white ball(O) and added energy which forced the red and white balls apart by a distance should I say the balls have transformed?. Well no they have not transformed they have simply moved further apart.


Thus a transform is dependent on the level at which we visualize something and for you it has changed or transformed and from my perspective it has not really changed. In effect you are trying to argue what you think I should see rather than trying to understand what I see. You are simply looking at the general bulk appearance of something while I am looking at all the parts which make up that something. Which begs the question... what do you hope to gain from viewing everything based on how it appears to you rather than what it is in reality?.


Obviously your not getting this so let's try another example. Fundamentally we know the H and O atoms are groups of charged particles bound by fields we call atoms. Normally we add energy to H2O in the form of a current and the constant electric field of this current produces a brute force which separates the H and O atoms by a distance. We now say the H and O atoms separated by a distance have become gasses. This is one way to separate H2O into H and O atoms however it is a very inefficient way when we consider the reality of what we are doing.


Do you know of any other way?... probably not because you are viewing the problem on completely the wrong level. Fundamentally there are two ways to tear matter(charged particles and fields) apart. 1) we apply a large constant brute force externally or 2) we apply a small intermittent force causing the particle/fields to oscillate in themselves and tear itself apart internally. Not unlike charged capacitor plates we can 1) pull them apart with a constant brute force against the internal forces or 2) cause each plate to oscillate in itself and in turn oscillate with the other plate to such an extent that they fly apart. One is just plain stupid while the other uses a little understanding and a little finesse to accomplish the same result in a more efficient way.


As you say... this is not rocket science. In effect you are always trying to throw hundreds of hand grenades at the exterior of a tank in hopes of breaking it apart. While I understand it would be much easier to simply throw one hand grenade inside and use the tanks own external strength against itself which is it's true weakness. These are common themes relating to how nature actually works beyond the scope of all those superficial things we think we see which were never actually true. Appearances can be deceiving and I seldom trust them as a matter of principal.


AC

[shylo]

balancing magnetic fields is all it is.
throw them off balance and you get a reaction, it can be in your favor or work against you.
that's all Lenz is.
throw it off balance and it works for your goal , instead of against it.
it still takes work to throw it off balance.
the accepted way to build a motor or generator is wrong, it uses more work than you need.
the cogging or Lenz, use that , it is a nice strong force that is a bi-product of motoring and generating
figure out when it manifests' and switch it off or re-direct it.
Nothing will ever work if you keep following the generalized method of motors or generators.
artv

[i_ron]

balancing magnetic fields is all it is.
throw them off balance and you get a reaction, it can be in your favor or work against you.
that's all Lenz is.
throw it off balance and it works for your goal , instead of against it.
it still takes work to throw it off balance.
the accepted way to build a motor or generator is wrong, it uses more work than you need.
the cogging or Lenz, use that , it is a nice strong force that is a bi-product of motoring and generating
figure out when it manifests' and switch it off or re-direct it.
Nothing will ever work if you keep following the generalized method of motors or generators.
artv

Good advice --- can you tell us more on how you do this?


Thanks


Ron

[tinman]

@tinman

An interesting observation.


We could also say water or H2O is simply two hydrogen atoms(particles and fields) bound to one oxygen atom(particles and fields) though their electro-magnetic fields.


To cause liquid H2O to become separate components such as H2 and O2 gasses we add energy which simply increases the space between the groups of charged particles we call atoms. For example if I had two red balls(H2) and one white ball(O) and added energy which forced the red and white balls apart by a distance should I say the balls have transformed?. Well no they have not transformed they have simply moved further apart.


Thus a transform is dependent on the level at which we visualize something and for you it has changed or transformed and from my perspective it has not really changed. In effect you are trying to argue what you think I should see rather than trying to understand what I see. You are simply looking at the general bulk appearance of something while I am looking at all the parts which make up that something. Which begs the question... what do you hope to gain from viewing everything based on how it appears to you rather than what it is in reality?.


Obviously your not getting this so let's try another example. Fundamentally we know the H and O atoms are groups of charged particles bound by fields we call atoms. Normally we add energy to H2O in the form of a current and the constant electric field of this current produces a brute force which separates the H and O atoms by a distance. We now say the H and O atoms separated by a distance have become gasses. This is one way to separate H2O into H and O atoms however it is a very inefficient way when we consider the reality of what we are doing.


Do you know of any other way?... probably not because you are viewing the problem on completely the wrong level. Fundamentally there are two ways to tear matter(charged particles and fields) apart. 1) we apply a large constant brute force externally or 2) we apply a small intermittent force causing the particle/fields to oscillate in themselves and tear itself apart internally. Not unlike charged capacitor plates we can 1) pull them apart with a constant brute force against the internal forces or 2) cause each plate to oscillate in itself and in turn oscillate with the other plate to such an extent that they fly apart. One is just plain stupid while the other uses a little understanding and a little finesse to accomplish the same result in a more efficient way.


As you say... this is not rocket science. In effect you are always trying to throw hundreds of hand grenades at the exterior of a tank in hopes of breaking it apart. While I understand it would be much easier to simply throw one hand grenade inside and use the tanks own external strength against itself which is it's true weakness. These are common themes relating to how nature actually works beyond the scope of all those superficial things we think we see which were never actually true. Appearances can be deceiving and I seldom trust them as a matter of principal.


AC

I ask you this one very simple and well defined question AC
Using the very well defined scientific terms,please quote the three states of mater 
What takes place when matter of one state !changes! into another state ?.

Brad