Lenz free generator

[shylo]

A difference in potential will do.
"No rectifier my ass."
All the rectifier does is let the stronger signal through or dominate.The other is still there.
artv

[Magluvin]

At Mags, You must have posted at the same time as me,..Tito is right.

There was a vid of a guy that at the time, he did an experiment on the floor(carpet) and he had 2 caps and a bifi coil. He rigged it up where he had 3 wires where he would short them out quickly and he had shown very little charge used from the source cap, but an even higher voltage in the dump cap. He called it Reverse Entropy.

There may be something to it. At the time I had just thought that the input cap was a large capacitance and the receiving cap was a small value. I could be wrong, but the input cap was one of those large electrolytics with the screw terminals on top, typically blue shrink wrap in color. And the other was more of a oval can like a motor start cap, which are not usually anywhere near the capacitance of the input cap shown.

Well this seems like a good place to start. So maybe we just need to set up the circuit roughly as shown and the critical ingredient would be the speed of the switching until we see an effect.

Mags

[forest]

Guys, it is sometimes good to observer what other users are trying to say. lancaiv has posted very useful informations.
https://worldwide.espacenet.com/publicationDetails/citingDocuments?CC=US&NR=5130608A&KC=A&FT=D&ND=3&date=19920714&DB=EPODOC&locale=en_EP

If you carefully read those patents you will find it is EXACT confirmation and replication of Tesla method of conversion. A capacitor and an inductance of the WHOLE circuit if MATCHED to load will allow to power load with very sharp pulses (looks like radiant energy described by Bedini, right?) with much higher voltage then normally allowed for load.
If that was Tesla first step then we are discussing here then next step without knowing about first one - very hard to understand then...
Another one : https://worldwide.espacenet.com/publicationDetails/originalDocument?CC=WO&NR=2012065719A2&KC=A2&FT=D&ND=3&date=20120524&DB=EPODOC&locale=en_EP#

[tinman]

Guys, it is sometimes good to observer what other users are trying to say. lancaiv has posted very useful informations.
https://worldwide.espacenet.com/publicationDetails/citingDocuments?CC=US&NR=5130608A&KC=A&FT=D&ND=3&date=19920714&DB=EPODOC&locale=en_EP

If you carefully read those patents you will find it is EXACT confirmation and replication of Tesla method of conversion. A capacitor and an inductance of the WHOLE circuit if MATCHED to load will allow to power load with very sharp pulses (looks like radiant energy described by Bedini, right?) with much higher voltage then normally allowed for load.
If that was Tesla first step then we are discussing here then next step without knowing about first one - very hard to understand then...
Another one : https://worldwide.espacenet.com/publicationDetails/originalDocument?CC=WO&NR=2012065719A2&KC=A2&FT=D&ND=3&date=20120524&DB=EPODOC&locale=en_EP#

Some time ago-a long time ago lol,i was fooling around with HV powering loads that had a voltage rating of far less.
Here is one of those videos ,where i show over 400 volts across a 2.5 volt LED-and the LED dose not blow.

So the HV is sent through two diodes,into a large 63v DC cap that has the LED across it,then the two wires/probes continue into a glass of water. A second set of spiral probes are also submersed into the glass of water,and connected to the AC side of a FWBR. The DC output from the FWBR is sent to a HV DC cap that has a neon across it. When the neon is removed,the cap is free to climb to over 400 volts--but the 2.5v LED dose not blow,and the DMM indicates it only has 1.8 odd volts across it 

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kXcCWVdkzwA


Brad

[jbignes5]

That is correct.
Even Tesla states in the patent ,that it is just a rotary transformer/converter.
There are those here that would have you believe that it is some sort of wonder machine,that only they can decipher.

Tesla was a great man,and bought forth great inventions,but there is not one free energy device amongst them. There are some(one in particular)that would have you believe otherwise,but the very same people(person) will deliver nothing to back up there claims.
This is how Tesla's true works get all distorted into something they are not.

The man (Tesla) should be remembered for what he did have,and what he gave the world,and not what the fairy penguins think his work was.
A perfect mis-representation of Tesla's work took place here a few pages back--Quote:--look,no rectifier. These are the ones to watch out for,as even with Tesla's drawing/schematic before them,they have no idea what there looking at.
No rectifier my ass.


Brad

Ok explain this one then:

Really look at this one. Where is the input?

Explain how this one works in detail. Lets see if you really understood Tesla...