Lenz free generator

[tinman]

Thanks for the video Brad.  I was waiting for you to turn the magnet the other way so that it was horizontal to see what that would do to the power out.  By horizontal I mean so the ends would be at 9 o'clock and 3 o'clock.  You certainly do quick work.

OK,here are the two scope captures of the vertical/horizontal test.


Brad

[citfta]

Thanks for the very quick response.  The results are what I was expecting but we never know until we see it firsthand.  Like you said the first results were surprising and not what was expected.  Maybe what is happening is the neo is helping to saturate the core just enough to allow it to be saturated more easily by the signal.  Similar to what they think is happening with the Gunderson device.  With the neo horizontal it is not helping to saturate the core material.  Just some wild off the top of my head ideas.

Thanks again for the quick response and interesting video.
Carroll

[tinman]

Thanks for the very quick response.  The results are what I was expecting but we never know until we see it firsthand.  Like you said the first results were surprising and not what was expected.   Similar to what they think is happening with the Gunderson device.  With the neo horizontal it is not helping to saturate the core material.  Just some wild off the top of my head ideas.

Thanks again for the quick response and interesting video.
Carroll

Maybe what is happening is the neo is helping to saturate the core just enough to allow it to be saturated more easily by the signal.

I believe if that was the case,then we would see a huge offset of the output wave, due to biasing the core.
Remember,the PMs field through the core dose not change,but the field produced by the primary coil is alternating--so why no biased offset on the output?.

With every other coil i have tried this with,i get either a reduction in output,or an offset due to biasing on the output wave form.

Might look into this a bit further.

EMJ-any thoughts?--maybe some relationship to the MEG effect ?.


Brad

[tinman]

Just did a P/in P/out efficiency test on this 1/2 hour hacked up transformer/generator to be thingy--with magnet in position.

P/in 3.92V @ 1.2mA=4.7mW
P/out=384mV across 100 ohms= 1.474mW

Efficiency=31.27%

Hey,this thing is a piece of crap,but it is still 23.97% more efficient that Jim !tha man! Murray's dynaflux generator 


Brad

[i_ron]

Mr. Ward.  This is a sick fucking joke.  I am told I am talking BS science, and you fucks bring this bullshit, a concept that this guy names after himself?  You both are serious, chris, small c, started this shit with "wardforce" so brad gets to sport the I'm with stupid T shirt.  Did either of you check Mr. Wards patent before you dropped to your knees and started publicly kissing his ass?  Probably not.  When he first showed up, I did. 
snip

Touche, but before we get too excited lets all talk about the same thing!


1) Ward force is nonsense


2) the patents of Ward and German are just Ecklin Brown variations


3) the "Coordinate Description" graphic that Chris posted is different. This is what Ward was demonstrating with the mag base and has nothing what so ever to do with the patents.


4) Brad's model is not what Ward was demonstrating.


OK???


Chris, thanks for all the posts


Brad, Very interesting but the two top and bottom haves are still joined where the mag base has a break. Also the magnet is supposed to be rotating and the two coils are both generator coils.


However from your static test it may be that there is a phase difference between the two coils??? wouldn't that give Mr Lenz a shock?


I have to finish my Teal motor first, then I will swing over to the "mag base" generator model.


Ron