ZERO INPUT, 10 degrees thermal output...Yes,...genuine free energy

[picowatt]

I answered you 2 times,   not accepting the answer is not a non-answer



I see youve taken worm lessons from High for Miles

My sincerest apologies, I must have missed it, as likely all other readers here have.

What was your answer?

ADDED:  Just two numbers are needed, the current thru, and the voltage across, the pre-magnet during the magnetization process when magnetized using a magnetizer as shown in your posted images.  No need to be exact, feel free to round.

[MileHigh]

PW:

Hey thanks for your comments, and best wishes and happy new year to you and everyone on the forum!

Perhaps Kenny could cope with a multiple choice question?

(A) Current through the pre-magnet (please specify voltage and current)
(B) Current through an external coil

You never know!  Talk about trials and tribulations...

[picowatt]

PW:

Hey thanks for your comments, and best wishes and happy new year to you and everyone on the forum!

Perhaps Kenny could cope with a multiple choice question?

(A) Current through the pre-magnet (please specify voltage and current)
(B) Current through an external coil

You never know!  Talk about trials and tribulations...

This was all discussed months ago in the "Ultimate" thread.  In fact, I believe my very first post in that thread was with regard to his comments that capacitors are discharged thru pre-magnets and that there was a some kind of distinction between a magnet made by using a PM to magnetize a material and the use of the electrical discharge of capacitors.  With him stating that only magnets made by discharging capacitors were "true" magnets.

Anyone who followed that thread should be able to answer the question presented.  Again, the question asked was:

During the magnetization process of a pre-magnet with a magnetizer such as the one in the image you posted, how much current flows thru the pre-magnet and what is the voltage across the poles of the pre-magnet?

Are we ready?  The answer is, quite simply, zero, for both current and voltage.

Great lengths are taken in the design of the fixture to ensure that no current flows thru the pre-magnet.  Any appreciable current could cause the pre-core to weld to the magnetizer's poles, burn thru the plating of the pre-magnet, or produce excessive heating.  In fact, there must be no continuity between the pole pieces whatsoever, or an electrically conductive pre-core such as Fe, AlNiCo, plated neo, etc., placed across the poles of the magnetizer, would form a single turn secondary thru which very large currents would flow (welding the pre-magnet to the poles, etc).

The clue in the image was not the meters on the control heads, but was actually the rough surfaces of the pole pieces in the image with the horeshoe magnet across the pole pieces.  As no voltage is applied across the pole pieces of the magnetizer, and therefore no current, there is no need for a smooth, electrically conductive surface with which to contact the pre-magnet.  Consider what any appreciable current would do with the minimal contact points afforded by the rough surface of the pole pieces.  The sparks would fly!

In those previous postings of months ago, TA seemed to finally concede that the capacitors were not actually discharged directly thru the pre-magnet, but then stated that there was instead an induced voltage and current.  That too was fully discussed, and an Engineer at a magnetizer manufacturer was consulted to confirm that indeed, no appreciable currents are induced into or thru the pre-magnet.  In fact, the rise time of the magnetic field of the magnetizer must be controlled (slowed) to ensure eddy currents are kept to a minimum, as their magnetic fields are in opposition to the magnetizer's applied field which would reduce the peak field strength acheived in the pre-magnet.

And finally, as well with confirmation from that Engineer, it was stated that only the peak flux achieved thru the pre-magnet was important, and not the actual source of the applied magnetic field,  That is, there was no distinction between a magnet created with a PM or the electromagnet of a magnetizer, all were "true" magnets without distinction.

So with all that rather lengthy and tortured discussion of months ago, it seemed odd that TA would (again) state:

    Now tell us how a capacitor bank is shunted thru a neodymium iron boron in the creation of a coherent polarized device (ie a "magnet")

And then object to anyone responding with "a capacitor bank is not shunted thru" a pre-magnet.

Happy New Year to All!

PW   

[TheoriaApophasis]

it was stated that only the peak flux achieved thru the pre-magnet was important, and not the actual source of the applied magnetic field,  That is, there was no distinction between a magnet created with a PM or the electromagnet of a magnetizer, all were "true" magnets without distinction.

"peak flux" meaningless BS,  there is a non contact INDUCED CHARGE DUMPED thru the formed magnet-TO-be.


There is an ENORMOUS qualitative difference between PM made by an electromagnet and and one created from another magnet

You LYING FUCK,.........while BOTH can achieve the same GAUSS rating, one is VERY VERY easy to reverse polarity on afterwards AND lose its gauss rating  (the one created with a PM),...... the other, NOT.



Polarized surface gauss readings DO NOT READ or REGISTER, or GIVE INFORMATION as to the inherent increased (or lack thereof) capacitance of the MAGNET BEING MEASURED IN GAUSS

idiot

And then object to anyone responding with "a capacitor bank is not shunted thru" a pre-magnet.

In fact, it is, non contact induction is DUMPED directly into the Pre-magnet

"DIRECTLY" has no bearing on CONTACT or NON CONTACT

Or stick your fucking head in a MICROWAVE and tell us how NON CONTACT feels.




Wireless power transfer is still in your "no fucking clue" part of your brain.

[picowatt]

TA,

Don't be such a sore loser!  But I do have to admit, the question was not that difficult.

As for your response to my post, you are wrong about many things.  Here is a copy of the post I made several months ago regarding the responses I received from a design Engineer at a magnetizer manufacturer.

In the previous post, you can see that TA refers to either passing electrical current directly thru the pre-magnet or doing the same using electromagnetic induction.  As passing the current directly thru the poles of a pre-magnet makes no sense on many grounds (and is indeed not actually done when using a magnetizer) we must assume he meant that the current was passed thru the pre-magnet via electromagnetic induction.

If this were the case, I proposed that the strength acheived in the pre-magnet would be rate dependent, that is, would follow Faraday's law and that a magnetizing field with a faster rise/fall time would create a stronger field in the pre-magnet (which I did not believe in reality to be the case).

As I also suggested I would, I have been in touch with an engineer at a magnetizer company and what follows are a few points regarding those discussions:

1. The currents that are induced into a pre-magnet by the magnetizer's changing field produce magnetic fields in opposition to the magnetizer's field. This is undesirable as it can limit the field strength achieved and produce unwanted heating.


2. Although the domains typically align within less than 10ns., the rate that the magnetizer's field is applied is typically slowed to reduce the effects of induced currents.


3. Modern magnetizers typically have selectable capacitor values and adjustable peak voltage values, which, in concert with magnetizer and jig inductance, allow the time parameters of the magnetizer's field to be tailored to reduce the effects of induced currents. As the magnetizer's field reaches its peak value, and briefly holds, all induced currents cease as they are rate dependent (i.e., the currents are only induced while the magnetizer's field strength is changing)


4. In a plated magnet, the induced currents are typically contained within, or greatest within, the plating and because their magnetic fields are in opposition to the magetizer's field, they can act to shield the interior of the pre-magnet and limit the depth of the domains within the pre-magnet that can be oriented (as above, the rate of change of the demagnetizer's field must be slowed to reduce this effect)


5. As it is currently understood, and with various methods having been used to provide evidence thereof, all permanent magnet alloys, and ferrous materials in general, upon cooling below their Curie temp, form domains of approx. 10,000 atoms or atom groups. Each domain assumes a particular magnetic alignment and each domain can be considered as being already magnetized as if it were itself a magnet. Therefore, all PM alloys, and ferrous materials in general, can be considered already magnetized upon cooling below their Curie temp. The catch being that the domains assume a random, lowest energy, alignment that produces a near zero net field strength overall. There are also what are referred to as "pinning forces" that keep the domains in their random low energy orientations.


6. Not all domains can be forced to orient in the direction desired. When all the domains that can be oriented, are oriented, the magnet is said to be saturated. The field strength required to reach saturation must be sufficient to overcome the pinning forces. Once oriented, the pinning forces again act to keep the domains in this new, higher energy state.


7. The source of the magnetic field used as the source of the magnetizer field is unimportant.  For a given applied field strength, that field strength is identical irregardless of whether it comes from an electromagnet or PM (although their are practical considerations regarding the use of a PM as its field cannot be turned off).


8. Other than the requirement that the magnetizing field peak value be applied for at least the minimum time required to orient the domains (typically<10ns), the rate at which the magnetizing field reaches that that peak value, or remains there, has no effect on the field achieved in the pre-magnet, accept as noted with regard to induced currents and the opposing fields they generate.


PW

PW