ZERO INPUT, 10 degrees thermal output...Yes,...genuine free energy

[CANGAS]

Still waiting for that ONE PIECE MOTOR PICTURE




So, where the goddamn hell is it?      No such bullshit exists, and you fucking know it.  

I left the building too soon?

TA, you are really unbelievably clownish. If you knew squat about electrodynamics, you would know about the one-piece Faraday motor/dynamo.

If you can afford it, buy Vallone's book, "The Homopolar Handbook". Pictures. Photos. And writing too.

Build one. You can run it on Faraday field lines. Don't know where to tell you to go to get them.


Regards
CANGAS 124

[TinselKoala]

He's just playing with words, CANGAS. Everybody reading here, including Kenny baby, knows what is meant by three-piece, two-piece, and one-piece homopolar motor/dynamo. His own posted diagram, and the image most recently posted, show a two-piece HPD, with a stationary magnet and a rotating copper disk. Other diagrams showed a three-piece HPD, and my video shows a ONE PIECE homopolar motor/dynamo. We all know that brushes, axles, frames, the Earth, etc. do not count in this nomenclature; it refers to the rotating parts only. Even foulmouth baby Kenny knows this. Kenny baby is just squirming, flailing, making stuff up _yet again_ since he has been skewered like a frog on a gig.  The "car of a thousand parts" argument that he tosses out is pitiful, childlike wordplay, mere sophistry, emitted in yet another attempt to bolster his insecure and fragile ego.

[CANGAS]

Oy vey! I'm forgetting everything! i'm remembering nothing!

TA's idol that he worships, (no, not Einstein) Tesla, experimented with and published much information about Faraday dynamos, including ONE-PIECE dynamos.  I'm pretty sure Tesla patented variations of the one-piece dynamo.

Anybody who claims to be an avid student of Tesla electrodynamics would surely already know all about them from having read of them (including PICTURES) in his studies of Tesla.

TA, you want a picture? Get out your Tesla reference books and start looking!

TA, you are looking as phony as a 3 dollar bill.


Ho ho ho.
Merry New Year
CANGAS 125

[CANGAS]

He's just playing with words, CANGAS. Everybody reading here, including Kenny baby, knows what is meant by three-piece, two-piece, and one-piece homopolar motor/dynamo. His own posted diagram, and the image most recently posted, show a two-piece HPD, with a stationary magnet and a rotating copper disk. Other diagrams showed a three-piece HPD, and my video shows a ONE PIECE homopolar motor/dynamo. We all know that brushes, axles, frames, the Earth, etc. do not count in this nomenclature; it refers to the rotating parts only. Even foulmouth baby Kenny knows this. Kenny baby is just squirming, flailing, making stuff up _yet again_ since he has been skewered like a frog on a gig.  The "car of a thousand parts" argument that he tosses out is pitiful, childlike wordplay, mere sophistry, emitted in yet another attempt to bolster his insecure and fragile ego.

Tinse....thanks for the cheering verification of my own surmise re TA.

Nothing to fault in any word of your post.

Except, if I wasn't trying to act like I was at least a little civilized and nice round here, I would have laid it on a little heavier.

But that is just a matter of style, not substance.


Best regards
CANGAS 126

[TheoriaApophasis]

you would know about the one-piece Faraday motor/dynamo.

If you can afford it, buy Vallone's book, "The Homopolar Handbook". Pictures. Photos. And writing too.

Build one. You can run it on Faraday field lines. Don't know where to tell you to go to get them.

you contradict yourself boy, a ONE PART device would NOT HAVE TO BE BUILT   


How goddamn dumb are you son?



Either you cannot COUNT parts, or youre a genuine imbecile,.............neither of which bodes well for you.

Again, no such goddamn thing exists,   PERIOD



Ill show you a Unicorn as soon as you produce a ONE PIECE MOTOR.


Never going to happen.