Advanced and Delayed magnetic field's.

[MarkE]

Yes,we have gone from learning to thinking we can set ruel's and absolutes(the laws of physics) in what would be nothing more than a drop of water in the ocean as far as mans time here go's.Man has put the brakes on in his own advancements,with a set of laws he really knows nothing about yet.

So this is it Mark,we have come as far as we can go?. No light speed travel because man says it's not possable-->what kind of crap is that. Tell us why light speed is not possable Mark.

I don't know where you get such ideas.  If anyone has evidence of new understanding that extends beyond our current understanding the vast majority of those in the sciences are thrilled to follow if not directly investigate.  The idea that science rejects reliable data in favor of dogma is one that I see frequently from people who are not in the business.

The key development of Western science has been the development of the scientific method.  The scientific method is incredibly adept at removing personal biases, agendas, or just plain mistakes from learning.  What we call physical laws came to become that way and stay that way only because of the mountain of evidence that backs them, and a complete and total failure to falsify them.  If at any point any of them are falsified then they will cease to be Laws.  Either a modification or a complete replacement will occur.  But for that to happen there must be commensurate evidence.

[dieter]

One more aspect of the core material drag test:


Shape. A flat body, when facing the pole, has a rather high "grip", a round shape is more slippry since the final path is decreasing in size down to a line.
I think the shape is probably more important than the material, although a high permeability results is more  bearing friction, temporary unbalance, de- and re-accelleration and vibration and therefor losses.


Peace

[Qwert]

Yes,we have gone from learning to thinking we can set ruel's and absolutes(the laws of physics) in what would be nothing more than a drop of water in the ocean as far as mans time here go's.Man has put the brakes on in his own advancements,with a set of laws he really knows nothing about yet.

So this is it Mark,we have come as far as we can go?. No light speed travel because man says it's not possable-->what kind of crap is that. Tell us why light speed is not possable Mark.

Tell us why light speed IS possable, Tinman.

[tinman]

Tell us why light speed IS possable, Tinman.

Anything that is not infinite has a limit,just as the speed of light dose. There idea or thinking that at light speed the ship would have infinite mass,and thus require an infinite fuel source is just rubbish. If the ship was to become infinite in mass,then so would the fuel source. You cant have one mass become infinite without the other doing so as well. But because the speed of light is not infinite,then neither is any mass that travels with it. Foe example-if some one was to switch on a torch for .1 of a second and switch it of again,and we could watch that beam of light travel through space,we would see a beam of light that was X mile's long-has a start and end-->it wouldnt be an infinite beam of light.

[MarkE]

We observe in experiments that accelerating even very light particles to high fractions of C takes tremendous energy.  We observe that it takes exponentially more energy the closer to C that we get in good agreement with the formula:

Kinetic Energy = m_REST*c²*(1/((1-v²/c²)^0.5) - 1)

The limit of that denominator as v => c is zero, meaning that the kinetic energy of the mass becomes undefined.

Do you know of any experimental evidence that there is a finite upper limit on the kinetic energy of a mass at light speed or beyond?