Advanced and Delayed magnetic field's.

tinman · January 03, 2015, 11:11:47 PM

The speed of light is not a constant,nor are eletromagnetic waves. Both light and magnetic waves travel slower in a preasurised enviroment,or an enviroment with a gravitational field than they do in a vacume. The very fact that they dont as yet know if photons have mass or not,leaves holes in physics,and these holes are justified by the term !theory and variables! To many unanswered questions in physics. One that really gets the mind thinking is-why is there much more matter than antimatter ,where is the equal in the opposite there?.

MarkE · January 04, 2015, 12:09:30 AM

Quote from: tinman on January 03, 2015, 11:11:47 PM
The speed of light is not a constant,nor are eletromagnetic waves. Both light and magnetic waves travel slower in a preasurised enviroment,or an enviroment with a gravitational field than they do in a vacume. The very fact that they dont as yet know if photons have mass or not,leaves holes in physics,and these holes are justified by the term !theory and variables! To many unanswered questions in physics. One that really gets the mind thinking is-why is there much more matter than antimatter ,where is the equal in the opposite there?.

You are back to arguing from ignorance.

tinman · January 04, 2015, 04:54:25 AM

Quote from: MarkE on January 04, 2015, 12:09:30 AM
You are back to arguing from ignorance.

It is not me that is being ignorant Mark. It is hard for me to take the word or listen to some one who dosnt know what the actual shape of a magnetic field is around a permanent magnet. Do you know that an electromagnets field shape is a little different to that of a PM-please see the thread magnetic mith's and misconception's.

I would appreciate you carrying out the small task i asked of you on that thread,as i have spent time and money showing you what you wanted to see-although to no avail apparently

MarkE · January 04, 2015, 05:07:59 AM

Quote from: tinman on January 04, 2015, 04:54:25 AM
It is not me that is being ignorant Mark. It is hard for me to take the word or listen to some one who dosnt know what the actual shape of a magnetic field is around a permanent magnet. Do you know that an electromagnets field shape is a little different to that of a PM-please see the thread magnetic mith's and misconception's.

I would appreciate you carrying out the small task i asked of you on that thread,as i have spent time and money showing you what you wanted to see-although to no avail apparently

Tinman what you are doing is offering a classical logical fallacy that is known as an: "Argument from ignorance."

As to the magnetic field shape, iron filings do a nice job of mapping out the field. The figure eight idea is betrayed as false by experiments that have been conducted thousands and thousands of times.

tinman · January 04, 2015, 05:25:48 AM

Quote from: MarkE on January 04, 2015, 05:07:59 AM
Tinman what you are doing is offering a classical logical fallacy that is known as an: "Argument from ignorance."

As to the magnetic field shape, iron filings do a nice job of mapping out the field. The figure eight idea is betrayed as false by experiments that have been conducted thousands and thousands of times.

Iron filings are one of the worse things you can use to show a magnetic field,and the reason for that i have explained before. I would like to see an actual magnetic mapping video,insted of countless cartoon pictures showing incorrect field shape of a PM magnet. I will continue this debate on the magnetic miths and misconceptions thread-where it belong's.