The 'free energy' spark

[pomodoro]

A great disservice? Then I'm sure you can point me to some posts of yours where you have done OU a great SERVICE. Because otherwise I can't see any reason why you are writing on this forum. If you think OU isn't possible (BS) then why you are interested in?

Have a look at the fruits of those two wankers in the last 20+ years and show me anything that works. 
I've done a lot of research and so far got nothing OU. I don't post negative results anymore. I take great care in making sure my measurements are real and look for mistakes before blurting out OU.
There is nothing OU replicable out there at the moment but one day a great discovery could be made, who is to say it will never happen.
Before believing all the BS you see on youtube, try the experiment I told you and see with your own two eyes that Bearden is a dickhead and Frolov an OU ass. Mind you they are probably great businessmen.

[Hoppy]

My guess: In the device we have high voltage without amperes (the open dipole) and - as a counter part - amperes without voltage (the ground current). Therefore Ohm's law does not apply. Now we should looking for the law that applies.

Are you really suggesting that a load on that device, whether it be incandescent / halogen bulbs or a motor can function on voltage without current or vica-versa, so as not to destroy the dipole?

[Zeitmaschine]

I'm suggesting that a load on that device runs on 220V and 8.2A, albeit volts and amps are originating not from the same source.

Have a look at the fruits of those two wankers in the last 20+ years and show me anything that works. 

Maybe that works. Don't know (yet). Time will tell.

Before believing all the BS you see on youtube, try the experiment I told you and see with your own two eyes that Bearden is a dickhead and Frolov an OU ass. Mind you they are probably great businessmen.

I'm making (basic) experiments all the time. Like that one below. And it gives me strange readings.

The ammeter connected to the 12V battery shows no increase in current when the high voltage sparks as marked. So I know there is something unusual going on here. What could it be?

Now tell me that this erratic sparking chances the resonance frequency of the 100Hz circuit in such a precise way, that the overall power consumption is compensated to one hundred percent. Can't believe this.

[PolaczekCebulaczek]

explain to me that one-sided ground current that we can see in the image below

current on one wire running a motor https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Qz1-RIcj1HY
I dont know how Stepanov and Kapanadze devices work, no one knows.
I believe in OU, I've tried this spark gap setup and saw no OU.Try it out too, its cool stuff.

[Zeitmaschine]

Can he run a three-phase motor also on one wire?

That visible stuff under Stepanov's cardboard box represents clearly a frequency doubler circuit (like in the schematic above). That means, if that device would be a fake, then why does it look that way? Why not three or five diodes instead of four? Why not a big capacitor or a fancy coil instead of a barely visible power resistor? A fake would »work« anyway.

And btw, Stepanov's  clamp meter is set to DC. A one-sided DC ground current is even more strange. Quote from Nilson Barbosa patent:

»... if the power supply is alternating electrical current - AC, the sensor provides alternating electrical current - AC. If the power source is a continuous electrical current - DC, the sensor provides continuous electrical current - DC.«

DC can drive a transformer? Mysterious things are going on.