Overunity.com Archives is Temporarily on Read Mode Only!



Free Energy will change the World - Free Energy will stop Climate Change - Free Energy will give us hope
and we will not surrender until free energy will be enabled all over the world, to power planes, cars, ships and trains.
Free energy will help the poor to become independent of needing expensive fuels.
So all in all Free energy will bring far more peace to the world than any other invention has already brought to the world.
Those beautiful words were written by Stefan Hartmann/Owner/Admin at overunity.com
Unfortunately now, Stefan Hartmann is very ill and He needs our help
Stefan wanted that I have all these massive data to get it back online
even being as ill as Stefan is, he transferred all databases and folders
that without his help, this Forum Archives would have never been published here
so, please, as the Webmaster and Creator of these Archives, I am asking that you help him
by making a donation on the Paypal Button above.
You can visit us or register at my main site at:
Overunity Machines Forum



Using geometry to multiply rotations = multiplying AC electricity

Started by that_prophet, January 12, 2015, 08:06:05 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

guest1289

This idea has  existed  for a  long,  long time.    But,    back then,   they did not have  magnetic-bearings,  or other  things.

(  I assume this idea was scientifically disproven years ago,  but I will still submit this post )

I can only think of this idea( the idea this thread is proposing )  in the following  scenario  :

  -  Not using any belts or pulleys.

  -  You turn a  'tiny-dial-set-in-the-center-of-a -very-large-wheel',  and then that  'very-large-wheel'  turns a  wheel( or wheels ) which is the same size as the original  'tiny-dial-set-in-the-center-of-a -very-large-wheel' .

  -  Every  wheel is rotating on  'magnetic-bearings' (  and I just designed the ideal bearing ).

  -  The wheel  turning another wheel( or wheels ) ,   only does so by a  special-type-of-magnetic-cogs( hopefully more based on repulsion,  rather than attraction ).
      THE TYPE OF MAGNETIC-COGS  I'M THINKING OF,  WOULD USE A  BRICK-WALL  TYPE OF PATTERN FOR ARRANGING THE MAGNETS,  TO  COUNTER-BALANCE  EACH OTHERS  MERGE-POINTS( STICKY-POINTS ).
        VISUALIZE  ONE  LAYER  OF  BRICKS( MAGNETS ) IN THE BRICK-WALL,  BEING SEPARATED BY A CERTAIN DISTANCE,  FROM THE NEXT LAYER OF BRICKS( MAGNETS ) IN THE BRICK-WALL,  SO THAT THE DIFFERENT LAYERS OF BRICKS( MAGNETS ) ON THE TWO WHEELS,  CAN  GRIP EACH OTHER SEPARATELY FROM THE OTHER LAYERS,   NO INTERFERENCE BETWEEN LAYERS.
        If this  cog-wheel-design  would not work,  then the  worst  result would be that the two wheels would have less grip on each other,  too much slippage,  or total slippage,   so you'd have too get that just right.

  -  I do not know how much my design reduces  Torque,  in terms of friction.  (  Any other sources of  Torque,  are too difficult for me to fully visualize,  or appreciate  ).  I'm sure there's inertia from weight of wheels,  but I don't know how much  etc etc.


guest1289

I  cannot  find  anything( reason )  to  'Disprove'  my  'Solution'  to making the  'Idea proposed in this thread'   function successfully.
_______

MY SOLUTION IS  :

  -  Not using any belts or pulleys.    Just use the wheels described below.

  -  You turn a  'tiny-dial-set-in-the-center-of-a -very-large-wheel',  and then that  'very-large-wheel'  turns a  much-smaller-wheel( or wheels ) which is the same size as the original  'tiny-dial-set-in-the-center-of-a-very-large-wheel'  .

  -  Every  wheel is rotating on  'magnetic-bearings' (  and I just designed the ideal bearing ).

  -  The wheel  turning another wheel( or wheels ) ,   only does so by a  NON-CONTACT special-type-of-magnetic-cogs( using either repulsion,  or attraction, or even a combination ).
      THE TYPE OF MAGNETIC-COGS  I'M THINKING OF,  WOULD USE A  BRICK-WALL  TYPE OF PATTERN FOR ARRANGING THE MAGNETS,  TO  COUNTER-BALANCE  EACH OTHERS  MERGE-POINTS( STICKY-POINTS ).
        VISUALIZE  ONE  LAYER  OF  BRICKS( MAGNETS ) IN THE BRICK-WALL,  BEING SEPARATED BY A CERTAIN DISTANCE,  FROM THE NEXT LAYER OF BRICKS( MAGNETS ) IN THE BRICK-WALL,  SO THAT THE DIFFERENT LAYERS OF BRICKS( MAGNETS ) ON THE TWO WHEELS,  CAN  GRIP EACH OTHER SEPARATELY FROM THE OTHER LAYERS,   NO INTERFERENCE BETWEEN LAYERS.
        If this  cog-wheel-design  would not work,  then the  worst  result would be that the two wheels might have too much slippage,    so you'd have too get that just right.

  -  I do not know how much my design reduces  Torque,  in terms of friction.  (  Any other sources of  Torque,  are too difficult for me to fully visualize,  or appreciate  ).  I'm sure there's inertia from weight of wheels,  but I don't know how much  etc etc.

TinselKoala

Please review the topics "Moment", "Moment arm", "Torque" in your favourite engineering textbook or online resource.

Red_Sunset

Quote from: that_prophet on April 22, 2015, 03:06:00 PM
yes, I believe that this idea came to me from the Holy Spirit,
because I ask God for a way to help the Tribulation Saints,
+ it was immediately that this awesome free energy device idea came to me
very clearly + rapidly in a  Vision

I will be hoping that many might start believing in Jesus,
After the 2520 day-7 year peace treaty is signed by Israel + Europe,
Before the 2019.1 Door closes,,,

Starting the TRIBULATION

Dear Prophet,
This is too extreme to let pass uncontested.
That you are trying to solve the world energy availability question is a good thing.
But if you believe that God came to help you with that,  I would say to think again.

How would you reconcile: 
Why would God forbid Adam to eat those apples from that tree ?
     and now he changed his mind and wants mankind to become all powerful ?
     using a energy lossy process that has been used in every gearbox, with none of them producing excess energy ?
     Try riding a bicycle sometime, observe.

I don't see it,  TinselKoala gives some good advice.  Maybe that was God's intention for you.

Red

citfta