Partnered Output Coils - Free Energy

[conradelektro]

Hi conradelektro. Well, Tesla in his radiant energy collector patent (685,957) gave examples of what he called 'radiant energy' as high frequency
radiation such as ultraviolet light, X-rays, etc., and therefore this probably also includes gamma rays, and anything that might be higher in frequency than that.
That is what Tesla referred to as 'radiant energy' in that patent application anyway. It appears Tesla was probably referring to any high frequency radiant energy that
originates from the sun, and the cosmos in general.
All the best...

Well, nobody besides Tesla could "see" that radiant energy. Some people are speculating that Tesla meant particles from space (and I guess you spoke of that as well in your post):

http://srag-nt.jsc.nasa.gov/spaceradiation/what/what.cfm

Space radiation consists primarily of ionizing radiation which exists in the form of high-energy, charged particles. There are three naturally occurring sources of space radiation:  trapped radiation, galactic cosmic radiation (GCR), and solar particle events (SPE).

But I doubt that the apparatus from Tesla`s patent could receive particles and turn them into electricity. I will forever stay a riddle what Tesla received with this apparatus. Specially the antenna is not well defined in the patent. May be it received just "radio waves".

Greetings, Conrad

[Void]

Another odd one. Different transformer winding arrangement this time from the previous one.
I have kept the scope leads as much away from other wires and transformer windings as I could, and also tested by moving
scope probes and scope leads around to make sure the phase measurements were not being thrown off by
stray fields getting into the probe leads. Power was again measured by logging data samples for all waveforms to CSV files,
and using a spreadsheet to calculate the instantaneous power for each voltage and current data set, and the overall average power.
Ch1 = yellow traces = voltage waveforms.
Ch2 = blue traces = current  waveforms.

For the curious, here is what the power calculations worked out to.
I am not attempting to draw any conclusions. Measurement error could still be fairly significant in these measurements,
but the measured results are still probably a fairly decent indication of what is going on with the transformer, (barring some unnoticed error).
I am still using a carbon film, 5%, 1 ohm  resistor for the CSR's at the moment, since I don't have better ones yet, so not the greatest.

Power Calculation results:
Input power:    119 uW
Output power:  2.37 mW
Even if you allow for say 50% measurement error, this is still strange results.
A fair portion of the input power seems to be reflecting back to the signal generator, based on the input current waveform anyway,
which would most likely just dissipate in the driver transistor circuitry in the signal generator. Not great since that would
be wasted power. With the very low output power, this particular winding arrangement I tried doesn't appear too practical.
About 20Vpp in and only about 2mW out to the LEDs. In this test I am using a ferrite toroid transformer with windings something along the lines
of the Gennady Markov transformer. It has two phase opposing primary windings, with each primary winding on an opposite side of the toroid.

All the best...

[MileHigh]

Here's how it Works. Below is the efficiency range for LED lamps (30 to 90} Lumens to watts. How do you find out about this? Read the package!

"LED lamp 30-90 lm/W".

Woopyjump's package clearly states the efficiency is 90 Lumens to watts. Right at the top of the efficiency range. That means fully lit 90 X 35 = 3190; His bulb produces 3190 Lumens of light intensity. He achieves this with .6 watts of input power! The manufacturer states it takes 3 watts at 220 volts. That means woopyjump has increased the overall operating efficiency by 5 times. Diveflyfish is up to 40 times with the same transformer!

Anyone who has a light intensity meter or "Lux" meter can easily visualize the difference between 261 and 3190 lumens of light intensity. That's 12 times brighter! That's the difference between a 10 watt and 120 watt bulb. That's like the difference between your glove box light and an emergency search light. There are people on this thread like MarkE and TinselKoala who are working too hard to cover up these extraordinary COP'S.

There is a better way to do tests like this.  For starters, you don't need some fancy setup.  You just need a "solid-state Bedini" circuit, a 555 controlling a MOSFET or transistor and you replace the charging battery with the LED lamp.  I am assuming that we are talking an unmodified LED lamp with the internal guts still in place.  There is no reason you can't do the same thing with a gutted LED lamp.

Perhaps a small transformer could be used as a ready-made toroidal inductor.  Notice you get the laminations thrown in for free.  You can play with several parameters; inductance, supply voltage, frequency, duty cycle, initial spike current, and spike energy.  You control all the variables associated with the inductive pulses that you fire at the LED lamp.  If you measure the inductance of the transformer and measure the current with a current sensing resistor, then you can measure the average output power without even needing a DSO.

You try a few times with different small transformers until you find a small one that works best at your chosen frequency.  Then couple with your 555 circuit and transistor mounted on a tiny breadboard.  The whole thing can be put inside in a tiny little box.

That's the real project, the big toroidal inductor business is simply overkill.  The important thing is to find a sweet spot between your choice of power source, transformer, overall size, and desired brightness.

Now that's a good project.  It strips away all of the BS and challenges the builder to push a controlled inductive spike of energy into an LED lamp.  It challenges the builder to figure out how to control all of the parameters and measure the inductive spike energy and associated average power that is being pumped into the LED lamp without special tools like a DSO.

So there is no "magic" associated with yet another fancy circuit built around a toroidal transformer.  Ultimately it's a variation on a Joule Thief.  So you make a 555-transistor-transformer-as-an-inductor circuit and make it as compact and efficient as possible.   If you have a signal generator, you can prototype with that and then build your 555 circuit after you define the pulse waveform.

You can even calculate your COP.  Let's say you use two D-cells in series for you power source.  You can measure that average power every easily.  Then you have your average power measurement for the inductive current spikes that go into the LED lamp.  Just compare the two for your electrical COP.

If you as builder do this, it will demystify these circuits a lot.  There is nothing special about the "Sergdo Transformer."  The bare-bones design I just suggested will almost certainly easily outperform the Sergdo device.

[MarkE]

@MarkE,

Most people know what a 40 watt bulb looks like when lit, or a 100 watt bulb. You have no idea what 261 lumens looks like. I do! This last comment of yours is just a bunch of screwy shit to cover the fact that you don't have a clue. You're just some kind of stinking imposter acting like big authority.

LOL.  Dude:  once again, the 241 lumens comes from your figures.     The 3W value is right there on the box, and 3W is what you said is going to the LED.  the 80.55l/W value is credible for OTS consumer LED bulbs.  If you can't handle 3*80.55 there is help on the www.

[MarkE]

Here's how it Works. Below is the efficiency range for LED lamps (30 to 90} Lumens to watts. How do you find out about this? Read the package!

"LED lamp 30-90 lm/W".

Woopyjump's package clearly states the efficiency is 90 Lumens to watts. Right at the top of the efficiency range. That means fully lit 90 X 35 = 3190; His bulb produces 3190 Lumens of light intensity. He achieves this with .6 watts of input power! The manufacturer states it takes 3 watts at 220 volts. That means woopyjump has increased the overall operating efficiency by 5 times. Diveflyfish is up to 40 times with the same transformer!

Anyone who has a light intensity meter or "Lux" meter can easily visualize the difference between 261 and 3190 lumens of light intensity. That's 12 times brighter! That's the difference between a 10 watt and 120 watt bulb. That's like the difference between your glove box light and an emergency search light. There are people on this thread like MarkE and TinselKoala who are working too hard to cover up these extraordinary COP'S.

LOL