Partnered Output Coils - Free Energy

[EMJunkie]

Something that was really an eye opener to me was when I realized, that the Lorentz force in a generator acts in a 90 degree angle to the B Field, regardless of the angular momentum of the approaching inductor.


So, yes, you're right, certain basics should be recapped, esp. when they are barely understood or misinterpreted by the highly educted because they never really looked at it, but just rephrased some incoherent theoretical claims of the "divine" standard model.


BR

@Dieter,

Yes, if one wants to create an Excess Energy Output to that which one is to Input, then one must understand how to achieve this!

Kind Regards

   Chris Sykes - hyiq.org
   To Reach New Horizons!

[EMJunkie]

EMJunkie, Can you please post the circuit that you said is too complicated for beginners.


Thanks.
                                                                                               .

@FatBird,

Please See Earlier Post:

Yesterday I suggested a H-Bridge which is what I have been using. Mine is too much work, and cost, to make it viable for others here. I did start a thread on this topic: http://overunity.com/14566/reliable-and-flexible-switching-system/#.VLra2E0fqUk

I can post Pictures of my new model if you wish tomorrow. I feel this would just confuse people so I am a little hesitant.

Kind Regards

   Chris Sykes - hyiq.org
   To Reach New Horizons!

[hanon]

Chris,

I have a doubt: if one inducer coil is affecting two bucking coils, one wound CW and the other CCW then the induction in each of then will try to create a current in each coil which has a oppositte direction. In some sense the induced current in both coils will try to cancel each other, and then the output will be lower.

I would like to propose you a scheme in order you can tell if I could be right: Suppose that there are two inducers and the in the middle the two bucking coils.  If the inducers have the same poles facing each other (let´s say N-N or S-S) then each induced coil is trasversed by the field from each inducer, therefore the output will add up.

What about an aligned configuration as:

INDUCER (North) ---- ONE BUCKING COIL ---- ONE BUCKING COIL ---- (North) INDUCER

Where both inducers are creating a North pole toward each bucking coil (same inducer poles facing each other: North-North). This way each bucking coil is transversed by a different inducer field : one inducing in CW and other inducing in CCW, the same as the wiring of both bucking coils. With this configuration the induced current is extracted in the center tap.

Could it be a valid scheme?

[EMJunkie]

Chris,

I have a doubt: if one inducer coil is affecting two bucking coils, one wound CW and the other CCW then the induction in each of then will try to create a current in each coil which has a oppositte direction. In some sense the induced current in both coils will try to cancel each other, and then the output will be lower.

I would like to propose you a scheme in order you can tell if I could be right: Suppose that there are two inducers and the in the middle the two bucking coils.  If the inducers have the same poles facing each other (let´s say N-N or S-S) then each induced coil is trasversed by the field from each inducer, therefore the output will add up.

What about an aligned configuration as:

INDUCER (North) ---- ONE BUCKING COIL ---- ONE BUCKING COIL ---- (North) INDUCER

Where both inducers are creating a North pole toward each bucking coil (same inducer poles facing each other: North-North). This way each bucking coil is transversed by a different inducer field : one inducing in CW and other inducing in CCW, the same as the wiring of both bucking coils. With this configuration the induced current is extracted in the center tap.

Could it be a valid scheme?

@Hanon

No, it doesn't work like this!

Bucking Coils are only used on the Output!

Not on the Input!

Again, I cant stress enough, please study the material I have given: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Z-V1z2TdQJA

All information was given in the first post: http://overunity.com/15395/partnered-output-coils-free-energy/msg433154/#msg433154

Don't make any changes until its working!

Kind Regards

   Chris Sykes - hyiq.org
   To Reach New Horizons!

[EMJunkie]

@ALL

Reading the prior posts to this thread, we now know How Charge is Separated, Where we have Magnetic Fields; E.G; Primary, Secondary, and that the Secondary is in the opposing direction to the Primary!

We know that the Secondary Magnetic Field is only a Result of Drawing Current from the Charge Separation that we have already bought about from the Primary Magnetic Field Changing in Time!

So, its now fair to say that:

Any Magnetic Field Changing in Time Can Separate Charge

So a Secondary Magnetic Field (Lenz's Law) can be used to actually Separate More Charge Carriers!!!

Green Coil: Input Coil
Gold Coils: Partnered Output Coils - Each Coil Increases Charge Separation

Kind Regards

   Chris Sykes - hyiq.org
   To Reach New Horizons!