Partnered Output Coils - Free Energy

[allcanadian]

@Nelson

The second law of thermodynamics states that all systems doing work always lose
some energy as waste heat. This creates a limit to the amount of energy that can
do work by a heating process, a limit called the available energy that make work.

I mean no offense and this is not directed at you but when I hear people talk about thermodynamics and heat the term ignorance comes to mind. Don't get me wrong I am a Power Engineer and an expert in all heat based energy systems and I have most likely forgotten more on this subject that 95% of most people will ever know. However a long time ago I came to understand my supposed field of expertise is in fact an illusion... a delusion.
All heat relates to oscillations in matter which is fundamentally ElectroMagnetic in it's nature as there is no "heat" at the most fundamental level only particles and fields. Heat does not radiate EM energy does, Heat does not conduct the EM oscillations in matter diffuse and convection is simply a diluted version of conduction. As such thermodynamics is just the simplified layman's version of Electrodynamics which doesn't really imply a deep understanding of much of anything in my opinion.
Chemistry is really no different as once again all we have are particles and fields at the most fundamental level thus all chemistry is also a simplified layman's version of Electrodynamics. So the answer seemed obvious to me that if everything we know and all fields of science always converge directly on the contruct of particles and fields then why not try to understand something which explains everything?. I still get a kick when people try to talk thermodynamics because to be honest it's like listening to a 5 year old trying to explain the space shuttle. It is just so far removed from the actual facts of what actually happens on the most fundamental level that it just sounds ridiculous.

I think we need to move past the caveman mentality of thermodynamics if we are to make any real progress and it has no future. There is zero possibility we will be using the antiquated disfunctional concept of thermodynamics and "heat engines" in our future.

AC

[nelsonrochaa]

@NelsonI mean no offense and this is not directed at you but when I hear people talk about thermodynamics and heat the term ignorance comes to mind. Don't get me wrong I am a Power Engineer and an expert in all heat based energy systems and I have most likely forgot more on this subject that 95% of most people will ever know. However a long time ago I came to understand my supposed field of expertise is in fact an illusion... a delusion.
All heat relates to oscillations in matter which is fundamentally ElectroMagnetic in it's nature as there is no "heat" at the most fundamental level only particles and fields. Heat does not radiate EM energy does, Heat does not conduct the EM oscillations in matter diffuse and convection is simply a diluted version of conduction. As such thermodynamics is just the simplified layman's version of Electrodynamics which doesn't really imply a deep understanding of much of anything in my opinion.
Chemistry is really no different as once again all we have are particles and fields at the most fundamental level thus all chemistry is also a simplified layman's version of Electrodynamics. So the answer seemed obvious to me that if everything we know and all fields of science always converge directly on the contruct of particles and fields then why not try to understand something which explains everything?. I still get a kick when people try to talk thermodynamics because to be honest it's like listening to a 5 year old trying to explain the space shuttle. It is just so far removed from the actual facts of what actually happens on the most fundamental level that it just sounds ridiculous.

I think we need to move past the caveman mentality of thermodynamics if we are to make any real progress and it has no future. There is zero possibility we will be using the antiquated disfunctional concept of "heat engines" in our future.

AC

hi allcanadian is that point ! The laws have to be updated and not anchored to a laws formulated at so many years without update.

[allcanadian]

@Nelson

hi allcanadian is that point ! The laws have to be updated and not anchored
to a laws formulated at so many years without update.

I think many people like us are becoming more aware of this fact and many still seem to be using outdated and confusing terminology and concepts to explain something which is fundamentally simple. The fact remains that if everything relates to particles and fields on the most fundamental level then if we fully understand them we understand everything. At which point it becomes apparent we don't have an energy crisis we have an intelligence crisis because we are swimming in a sea of energy.

AC

[nelsonrochaa]

  Nelson:
   I think that what you are showing in the video, when the motor speeds up, is a better impedence match, as the amp draw will be raised as well. So, Not more out than in.

Hello Nick.
I think you did not see well the video.
The engine consumption, lower and speed up when I turn the resistive load (bulb) think noticeable in the video that the engine speed increases and the lower the total consumption.
About more out than input , i think you do not understand my point of view that i try to explain in last post about conversion efficiency and losses. My English is awful but i think you can understand .
thanks   

[NickZ]

     a.King:
     You may have touched on the partial answer my question, as to WHY we don't GET IT.
    Mind control!!!  Airborn devices, satellite woodpecker signals, Tv commercials, Cell phone, etz...
    Microwave interference, altering the mind's ability to conceive certain ideas,
such as FE concepts,  etz...    So, we are not free to invent, nor re-invent,  at all.
                                                                                                                                NickZ