Partnered Output Coils - Free Energy

[EMJunkie]

Quote from Tinman;

"Coil B's current can flow into the cap along with coil A's current for a brief period of time, but coil A's current cannot flow into coil B at any point".

The circuit schematic clearly shows the path for Coil B's current into the cap traveling through Coil A. Coil B is connected to the cap through Coil A.

My Lenz Reversal theory is based on JLN's "Core Lag" theory. What happens to Coil "A" core's "Remnant Viscosity" when the Coil B current reverses it's polarity, and Coil B's core demagnetizes? Does the Bucking connection briefly neutralize the core polarity?

How could it be possible to charge Coil A from Coil B if they weren't connected? The B Coil "Charge Event" of output Coil A may make a crucial difference in the Transformer's performance.

Tinman's not the first to retard the dwell by discharging into an output coil. Lengthening the "Hysterisis Loop" by inducing impedance.

Coil B's current can flow into the cap along with coil A's current for a brief period of time,but coil A's current cannot flow into coil B at any point.

@Synchro1 - Nice Spotting! I missed this one! Thanks!

"Switching In" ...

   Chris Sykes
       hyiq.org

[gyulasun]

...
As i have stated before,i do have concerns elsewhere in the system,and i have sort help in that area.
....

Hi Brad,

Going through your posts on this interesting setup of yours, (I am a late comer because of being away) I noticed the above concern and would like to ask whether it got already cleared up or still need some help? provided of course if you wish to discuss it.

Another qustion: can you imagine a motionless setup  based on the similar working principle?

Thanks for showing your tests and the measurements.

Gyula

[woopy]

Hi Gyula

What a pleasure to see you here

What do you think of my question to Brad , About the origin of the flyback spike,

This question is the result of my last experiments where i replaced the carbon brushes with tungstene rods and at my great surpise and under certain circumstances  , the positive tungstene rod just began to melt due to flyback spikes under an input power of only around 10 watts ------Remind me of my SERGDO experiment !!!

thank's for sharing

Laurent

[gyulasun]

Hi Laurent,

Well, I would say yes to your suggestion of the flyback coming from the rotor coils (though the 'modus operandi' is not a 100% sure for me yet, Brad refers to components not shown which may modify things) and this flyback pulse induces also a voltage spike in the stator coils (rotary transformer).
And the shorting circuit (shown as a box on the left) may also create another voltage spike when the short is just off. We may also have to consider the magnetic field created by the shorted stator coil during the time moments it is shorted.
Regarding the melting of the tungsten rods (i.e. brushes),  this may indicate the input power may not get loaded correctly in the right moments by the stator coil(s). On the 'load' here I mean utilizing the magnetic flux coming from the rotor coils.
We will hopefully learn more from Brad.     Thanks for your kind words.

Gyula

[EMJunkie]

@All - 2 Output Coils "Partnered Output Coils" Interacting together, to produce an output!

I am going to ask you, again, think about how these interactions can produce Excess Energy!

Any device that uses 2 Output Coils, "Partnered Output Coils" that Interact together to produce an Output are exactly what I have bought forth here for ALL to benefit from!

   Chris Sykes
       hyiq.org