Partnered Output Coils - Free Energy

[Spilled Fluids]

Ok guru,dose it take energy to create a magnetic field<--lets see if you can answer this.

Oh,by the way--the bricks in your car thing. Once the car is moving,the bricks now has stored potential energy. When you stop the car,the bricks would have given back that stored energy in way of inertial force against the car.

I and probably the others am tired of your silly games. I'll leave in the capable hands of the power utility who don't find any humour in your nutball ideas.

I'll leave you with these last words. Since you have more than adequately demonstrated you know little about physics, I'm calling your device just another hunk of iron that does nothing but cause problems with the power utility and because you tell us it isn't an over unity device.

[MarkE]

the difference is more the car traveling down hill as apposed to up hill.
But before i go any further,we will wait for !self bouncing masses with elasticity! to answer my question.

No, the issue here is mesuring the energy that it takes to get the car to some speed versus the continuous power required to keep the car going at that speed given windage, tyre rolling losses, etc.  The PM oriented one way yields a higher field, but that higher field does not come for free.  Conversely, if you reverse the PM you end up with a weaker field and that field costs less energy to establish.  The PM does not add energy in the former case, nor does it destroy energy in the latter case.  You are not evaluating the energy required to set-up the field. 

On the bouncing ball:  A cycle starts at the ball's apogee.  As you note, each successive apogee is lower and lower due to losses.  Each cycle begins with a given gravitational potential energy and over the course of that cycle, the potential at the end is less than at the beginning.  The ball only bounces because GPE converts to KE during the fall and then into potential energy in the stress of the ball material on impact and then back into KE as the ball pushes away from the ground, and finally GPE as it reaches its new apogee.  If the ball were to reach the same apogee cycle after cycle, or successively higher apogees then things would be very interesting.

[Spilled Fluids]

What two others have said that the energy used to compress the ball for the second bounce is not from the energy used and stored to lift the ball to it's starting height?

Put on your remedial reading glasses and check the last couple of pages of this thread.

[picowatt]

We are not replacing the EM with a PM,we are replacing the ferrite keeper with a PM.

I know, please reread my post, you apparently missed my point...

Irregardless of whether the EM is an EM or a PM, and as well, irregardless of whether the "block" is ferrite or a PM, is work being performed during any period of time during which the system is "stationary"?

PW

[MarkE]

We are not replacing the EM with a PM,we are replacing the ferrite keeper with a PM.

What picowatt was trying to get you to consider is when is work being done.  Let me put it to you this way:  Suppose that we leave the electromagnet on for a week.  How much energy is transferred to the spring after the first minute?  How about the first hour or day?  How do those values compare to the amount of energy that goes into the spring during the first second?