Partnered Output Coils - Free Energy

[EMJunkie]

Sometimes a piece of Chocolate is enticing:

ALL,

I have been a member here since 2010. You will not find any posts prior to this due to seeing too many personal attacks on this site.
Chris is trying to share something with all of you, and all he asks is that you replicate his experiment to see the effect that he has been studying for 15 years.
Typically a tank circuit will have a Q and as you load that circuit the Q will diminish.  By using Chris's method of bucking/partnered/mirrored coils, when you add a load to the tank circuit it still retains a high Q with the addition of the load. Utilizing the method of bucking/partnered/mirrored coils we currently are lighting a 12V light bulb and the circuit is retaining a Q of over 20.
I would hope that you are all open minded enough to replicate Chris' work and find out for yourself.  If you learn nothing else you will at least see an unexpected unique effect.

Ask yourself, what exactly is Mr Polarisz trying to tell you?

In physics and engineering the quality factor or Q factor is a dimensionless parameter that describes how under-damped an oscillator or resonator is, and characterizes a resonator's bandwidth relative to its center frequency. Higher Q indicates a lower rate of energy loss relative to the stored energy of the resonator; the oscillations die out more slowly. A pendulum suspended from a high-quality bearing, oscillating in air, has a high Q, while a pendulum immersed in oil has a low one. Resonators with high quality factors have low damping so that they ring longer.

This is just one of many verifications that you, the people have had on this thread!!!


You need to help yourselves, and not expect special treatment, do it for yourselves!


    Chris Sykes
        hyiq.org

[EMJunkie]

As the very slow, intellectually retarded, may not realise, Independant Verification is the Ultimate Verification!

Verification and validation are independent procedures that are used together for checking that a product, service, or system meets requirements and specifications and that it fulfills its intended purpose.[1] These are critical components of a quality management system such as ISO 9000. The words "verification" and "validation" are sometimes preceded with "independent", indicating that the verification and validation is to be performed by a disinterested third party. "Independent verification and validation" can be abbreviated as "IV&V".

In practice, the usage of these terms varies. Sometimes they are even used interchangeably.

Independant Verification is the ultimate proof, it is undisputable and undeniable.

So, the question answered, for those that do not understand, is: "Why do I show others work" - It is independant verification!!! Undisputable and Undeniable

When they tell you the exact same thing I have:

My dear friends abroad,

This is my first experiment with a Toroidal Transformer for a power of 1.6 Kilo Watt. My Transformer has one Primary Winding and two secondary windings. Each Winding is wound separately, this means that the end of the first winding is end, and the begin of the of the second winding, is separated by a Gap!

So we have two Gaps!

Here and Here.

According to my telly, one of the secondary winding is connected oppositely with respect to the primary winding, so that the Magnetic Fluxes of the Coils, are facing each other.

It is independant verification!!! Undisputable and Undeniable!!!


That is, unless youre a World Class Oompa Loompa Scientist that deals in Oompa Loompa Logic!!!


    Chris Sykes
        hyiq.org

[EMJunkie]

One we have looked at before, it was not a topic that came up however!

Another implimentation of the same technology.

1. 4050 Tokay Court, Napa, CA 94558, USA
2. Department of Nuclear Physics, China Institute of Atomic Energy, P.O.Box 275(10), Beijing 102413, China
3. Pangeo Corporation, 2005 Black Acre Dr., Oldcastle ON, N0R 1L0,Canada

Abstract
In this invented transformer, a compensating coil is series connected with the secondary
coil in opposite polarity. The magnetomotive forces generated by the loading current in
the secondary coil and the compensating coil are cancelled out. The power can be
delivered with zero input current in the primary coil when the turn number of secondary
coil is the same as that of compensating coil. When a boost coil is added to the
compensating coil, the input current in primary coil is phase inverted relative to its input
voltage. A magnetic shunt is added to adjust the flux leakage of this transformer.

Description
This transformer is composed of magnetic core, magnetic shunt, primary coil A,
secondary coil B and compensating coil C. The schematic of the transformer is shown in
Figure 1. The primary coil A and secondary coil B are mounted in-and-out or adjacently
on one side of the magnetic core; the compensating coil C is mounted on the other side of
the magnetic core. There are air gaps between the magnetic core and the magnetic shunt.
If the output terminal is composed by the secondary coil B alone, the transformer
must require input current through primary coil A to cancel out the magnetomotive force
generated by the loading current in coil B. If the output terminal is composed by series
connecting coil B and coil C with opposite polarity and the turn number of coil B is the
same as that of coil C, the inducted voltage on coil B is larger than the inducted voltage
on coil C due to the magnetic flux leakage through the magnetic shunt and air around the
magnetic core. The output voltage is
V output = VB – VC (1)
The loading current through coil B and coil C supply equal but opposite magnetomotive
force in the magnetic core and they cancel out each other so that the transformer doesn't
require input current through primary coil A. The voltage difference between coil B and
coil C can be adjusted by changing the position of the magnetic shunt.
If a boost coil is added to coil C so that the turn number of coil C is more than that
of coil B and the inducted voltage in coil B is still larger than coil C, the primary coil A
must supply a phase inverted current relative to its input voltage to cancel out the extra
magnetomotive force generated by the boost coil. The inducted voltage in coil B must be
larger than that of coil C, otherwise the transformer will require more input power than
the output power.

Is it me, or is it, that only smart people catch on to this?


    Chris Sykes
        hyiq.org

[EMJunkie]

Yes I think YOU missed that:

The inducted voltage in coil B must be larger than that of coil C, otherwise the transformer will require more input power than the output power.

    Chris Sykes
        hyiq.org

[EMJunkie]

I have said before: Many roads lead to Rome

Why, what does this mean?

It means that this technology is board! There are many ways and implementations that can give results! I have shown two ways, Wistiti has invented a third, with his POCoil Toroid.


    Chris Sykes
        hyiq.org