Partnered Output Coils - Free Energy

[TinselKoala]

(in response to my question about the schematic above)

The 0v leg and the gnd leg?   transistors - refference to sig input?

Mags

Yes, what is up with that?

I would like to know the reason that this circuit is designed this way. It appears in both "Experiment 1" and "Experiment 2" in EMJunkie's pdf, the only difference being whether the "partner" coils are connected in bucking or aiding series.

What is the justification for the lower mosfet?

Does "0V" mean earth/chassis ground, or the non-grounded "minus" terminal of the PSU?

Does EMJunkie's scope connect the probe reference lead to the chassis ground and back through the line cord to the mains/earth ground as many do?

Many FGs do connect the "black" output lead to chassis/earth ground in this way. Some, like mine, can be fully isolated by a panel switch, but connecting the "black" FG output lead (BNC shield) to a common ground point, or through a BNC connector to another (grounded) instrument with a patch cable, overrides this isolation feature so one must be careful not to create a groundloop inadvertently.


So... what is up with this schematic?

[MileHigh]

Captain Zero:

There is no such thing as "standard electronics knowledge"...until the effects of the manifested magnetic field is thoroughly understood...which this doosh seems to be hell bent on preventing.

That's another nonsensical statement from a position of ignorance.  You go to a transformer manufacturer in Shenzhen, China where they might make hundreds of thousands of transformers per day.  You talk your talk to the engineering and production engineering teams and they will laugh in your face.

Nor am I hell-bent on preventing learning.  In fact I share good knowledge with people on this forum quite often.  But we know that you can't "cope" with that fact and will ignore it.

MileHigh

[minnie]

   hanon,
           please indicate how facts which are easily verifiable manage to "kill off" a
thread. Sour grapes can.
            John.

[TinselKoala]

Schematic? Hello! The image has been viewed over a _hundred times_ since I posted it and only two people have replied to my question about the very real and legitimate issues concerning it.  And they have no answers but reinforce the questions.

Is anyone actually serious about anything in this whole thread, except bashing the skeptics? Did anyone besides me actually _read_ the pdf?

[conradelektro]

It is ridiculous to accuse some one of having killed this thread. Even stupid insults can not keep people away. And MileHigh wrote not a single insult.

It is also unrealistic to expect people to instantly build test set ups. It always takes me days if not weeks to hook something up. One has other things to do as well.

I do not know why EMJunkie does not want to write about his measurements, very unwise. So one could legitimately say that he himself killed the thread.

For me the instantly appearing Apostles or Acolytes of an unproven OU-Jesus are the boring part of a thread. And these strange fellows are dishing out insults over and over again.

It also lets me down when a OU-preacher starts to teach by help of riddles instead of providing tangible data. For Christ's sake, allegory is for religious leaders and not very useful in a technical forum.

I forgive errors, insults, wrong circuits and nonsense, but not arrogance without proof. For most of the OU-inventors I have seen in the OU-forums a "mental condition" seems to be the best explanation of their personality (also for their avid followers).

Greetings, Conrad