Partnered Output Coils - Free Energy

[MileHigh]

This is a shout-out to all of the early replicators.  That includes Skywatcher123 and some others.  Where are you?  It seems to me like when some other replicators get involved you all get shy and run away.  Don't be shy, you should come back and try to do your own replications.

I scolded many of you because you were doing bullshit replications.  You were just taking circuits that you were already familiar with and modifying them slightly and pretending that that they were replications of Chris' circuit.  That's just nonsense.

You can see what is going on right now.   So why don't you come back and get involved?  What you have to do is do a real replication, not the fake pseudo replications that you were doing before.

I challenged you early replicators to discuss how to make proper measurements, and none of you had anything to say.  Now you can see a real discussion going on about making proper measurements, so there is nothing stopping you from getting involved.

I have seen this pattern many times before.  You now have a chance to get involved again but do it right - don't present bullshit fake circuits, present the real circuit and make the real measurements.   You have to measure power-in vs. power out.  If you don't do that then you are faking it and wasting your time.

[Cap-Z-ro]

This is a shout-out to all of the early replicators.  That includes Skywatcher123 and some others.

Actually, some  more people are looking at this, so this ass clown thought he'd better stir things up again, by trying to bait the early replicators.

Such is the pattern of the paid shill.

Where are you?

He knows full well they followed Chris to the OUR forum...how you may ask ?

Because they posted their intentions in this thread.

It seems to me like when some other replicators get involved you all get shy and run away.

They, like Chris were fed up with harassment from the paid idea killers. 

I scolded many of you because you were doing bullshit replications.

Scolded by a paid ass clown shill, he means.
 

You were just taking circuits that you were already familiar with and modifying them slightly and pretending that that they were replications of Chris' circuit.  That's just nonsense.

This doosh wouldn't know a replication, because he has never done one.

You can see what is going on right now.

Yes, I believe just about everyone can now see what this ass clown is all about...turmoil - chaos and flux = distraction.
   

So why don't you come back and get involved?  What you have to do is do a real replication, not the fake pseudo replications that you were doing before.

This doosh wouldn't know a replication, because he has never done one.

I challenged you early replicators to discuss how to make proper measurements, and none of you had anything to say.

The ass clown will of course let us all know when he invents a gauge to measure magnetism and gravity.

Now you can see a real discussion going on about making proper measurements, so there is nothing stopping you from getting involved.

The real discussion is likely at OUR.

I have seen this pattern many times before.

He sure has.

You have to measure power-in vs. power out.  If you don't do that then you are faking it and wasting your time.

He, above all about wasting time...everyone else's, that is.

Regards...

[MileHigh]

Chris:

I certainly do not want to come to this forum and Criticise others, but if I may say, MileHigh, does not understand, what is going on in these devices! Although he is a smart guy, if I may suggest, that what he says is taken with just as much weight in the other direction   I am sorry and I hope this is not taken the wrong way

Yes, you are in spin mode.  You have been in spin mode almost the whole time starting with the discussion about the non-existent Bloch wall.  I know that you said that you have dedicated many years of your life to this.  The problem is that if the foundation is no good, then no matter how 'slick and cool' the house may appear to be, the house if going to collapse sooner rather than later.  There is no point in dedicating yourself to something if you are going in the wrong direction.

You are just treading water right now, and it's going to grimmer and grimmer as more results come in.  I am no super expert, I don't even really and truly like electronics.  But this is my former profession and you can't just pretend that "you know better."  It looks like most of your research has been from questionable GIGO sources.  The real truth is more important than your ego and likewise it's more important than my ego.  "Bucking coils" in a transformer is just one of many nonsensical electronic circuit designs that you see on the forums.  Reality and the truth will prevail.  Did you read my posting about the issue of having a gap in the core?  Similar issues are at play for your entire proposition.

MileHigh

[MileHigh]

Captain Zero:

The usual hollow, unproductive, miserable, untruthful, sourpuss crap from you.  I bet you say that to impress the boys.

I think you need to sit on this.  That will shut you up.

MileHigh

[MileHigh]

Groundloop:

I have made my two Partnered Output Coils. I did try to make two identical coils,
but it was difficult. One coil is 91.85mH and the other is 91.94mH (Without any
core in them.) I did wind one coil CW and the other coil CCW and did mark the
winding direction with an arrow symbol. Now the question, what way must I
put the coils onto the core to get the correct canceling of the magnetic field?

There is an important issue I am going to discuss here.   I am quoting your text, just as an example.  My comments below are not directed at you personally.

Just the fact that Chris and many others will say, "wind one coil clockwise and wind the other coil counter-clockwise" shows the faults and pitfalls with trying to educate yourself about electronics and looking in the wrong places.  I am sure that Chris and many others have been saying this "CW" vs. "CCW" winding stuff for years.

If you said this to someone seasoned and experienced in electronics they would give you a funny look for sure.  It's because clockwise vs. counter-clockwise is almost meaningless.  To state the requirement to "wind your coils in the correct direction" is on one level a ridiculous statement.

Here is why:

Wind Coil A clockwise and wind Coil B clockwise to get bucking coils.

That is equal to:

Wind Coil A clockwise and wind Coil B clockwise.  Swap the two wires on Coil B.   Now you have bucking coils.

That is equal to:

Wind Coil A clockwise and wind Coil B clockwise.  Swap the two wires on Coil A.   Now you have bucking coils.

That is equal to:

Wind Coil A counter-clockwise and wind Coil B counter-clockwise.  Swap the two wires on Coil A.   Now you have bucking coils.

That is equal to:

Wind Coil A counter-clockwise and wind Coil B counter-clockwise.  Swap the two wires on Coil B.   Now you have bucking coils.


So, there is nothing explicitly wrong with giving instructions on which direction to wind coils.  What is wrong is not realizing that it is almost a moot point.

I have seen people post, "I wound my coil the wrong way!  Dammit!  Now I am going to have to unwind my coil and rewind it properly!"

If you have been playing with electronics and you never realized this then that is clearly telling you to stop getting your electronics knowledge from the forums.  Stop for two months and go to a book store and buy a few "Beginner's electronics" books and read them first.

MileHigh