Partnered Output Coils - Free Energy

[conradelektro]

............

But again, I find this all rather bizarre, as the OP himself does not feel compelled to replicate his own device or present any measurements that would support his claims.  Supposedly replicators are to just keep playing with the device with all manner of coil, core, and drive setting combinations until they achieve an OU result.

@Picowatt and @All:

I had this core, some wire and my instruments. So it was just some time and little effort to wind such a "coupled output coil". Doing the measurements was then not that easy, but that could be my clumsiness.

I then bought a little mono audio amplifier because I never played with one before. So, I will hook up my "transformer" to that mono audio amp and we will see.

It is all just play. I like tinkering with electronics and it is less boring to try "strange things" than building electronics which you can by from China cheaply. Building radios is pretty pointless once you have the Internet. And building a Mobile Phone or a LapTop at home is close to madness.

It was obvious after a few posts from our "inventor" that it will be pretty hopeless.

What is interesting from a Freudian point of view are the reactions of some people in this thread. What is exciting some people so much, that they resort to name calling? May be that is the real experiment going on here?

It is a PSYOP or MISO http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Psychological_Operations_%28United_States%29 .

Run, hide, look around, there might be a recording device installed in your living room and drugs are administered through the groceries you buy at your local super market!

I might have received sublime messages via my PC-screen, which caused me to start replicating. The "partnered output coils" leak brain waves which mess you up, you will join some strange army.

Well, may be I am wrong.

Greetings, Conrad

[picowatt]

@Picowatt and @All:

I had this core, some wire and my instruments. So it was just some time and little effort to wind such a "coupled output coil". Doing the measurements was then not that easy, but that could be my clumsiness.

I then bought a little mono audio amplifier because I never played with one before. So, I will hook up my "transformer" to that mono audio amp and we will see.

It is all just play. I like tinkering with electronics and it is less boring to try "strange things" than building electronics which you can by from China cheaply. Building radios is pretty pointless once you have the Internet. And building a Mobile Phone or a LapTop at home is close to madness.

It was obvious after a few posts from our "inventor" that it will be pretty hopeless.

What is interesting from a Freudian point of view are the reactions of some people in this thread. What is exciting some people so much, that they resort to name calling? May be that is the real experiment going on here?

It is a PSYOP or MISO http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Psychological_Operations_%28United_States%29 .

Run, hide, look around, there might be a recording device installed in your living room and drugs are administered through the groceries you buy at your local super market!

I might have received sublime messages via my PC-screen, which caused me to start replicating. The "partnered output coils" leak brain waves which mess you up, you will join some strange army.

Well, may be I am wrong.

Greetings, Conrad

Conrad,

I agree with everything you comment on.  Particularly the part about just having fun and a possible learning experience.  I would encourage anyone to experiment and become more familiar with their equipment.

I thought you did rather well in performing your recent tests and making your measurements.  The error I pointed out I knew at the time was just you inadvertently grabbing a wrong number out of the pack, because you had it right in your prior test.  No biggie...   

It is a shame that EMJ is not more forthcoming regarding his measurements and methods.  He could make it very easy for replicators to duplicate his results if he truly desired to do so.

And yes, I too could easily live without a lot of the "attitude" expressed on this forum...

PW

[MileHigh]

I think I tried asking a lot of those sensible questions at the beginning but got nowhere and then that's just one slip of the banana peel away from being a "bad guy" or a "government agent."

So yes, it's just about turning it into fun and a learning experience.  If you are a newbie to the whole scene though, it's shocking how many of these projects are just bad designs getting bad results.  Look at the QEG as an example.  And no doubt, you do have a bunch of grown adults, people with houses and children, in a reality distortion zone.  That part is almost scary sometimes and it's like you are becoming the very thing that you rail about.

So bring on the replications and look for convergence, even if that convergence means that they are all 5% efficient in terms of power out vs. power in.

MileHigh

[ramset]

Conrad
I am absolutely loving  your presentation ,and the help from MH and the community.
So are many others.
I believe with a little more cooperation here and some organization
we can work thru All the ideas presented by EMJ and do a better job defining
these claims and their Merit towards the goal...Cop 1.7  ??


half a job will never do,as long as it is not too time consuming the whole community will learn
and we can use these exercises and experiments for reference to future claims.


this magnet wobble thing should be experimented with and explained here,
I know Marco always remarked at how he felt folks placed too much emphasis
into his dancing magnets....maybe he will participate and correct me on this ?


respectfully
Chet
PS

working together like this is amazing ,as long as it can remain respectful
like Most of the last day.....
it will completely change this forum,and we can do some really cool experiments here.



Or of course we could keep things the way they were..

[TinselKoala]

Hi MarkE. Thanks for the reply. Nice drawing! You didn't have to go to all that trouble, but I appreciate the effort.
Yes, OK, I understand that the inductive reactance of the CSR's has to be very small compared to
the resistance of the CSR's to get accurate phase measurements. The CSR's I am using are carbon film type,
I believe, so their inductance should not be too significant. Regarding CSR's, can anyone recommend good
low inductance and high precision 1 ohm resistors (preferably from DigiKey) which I can use as CSR's?

All the best...

Please see the datasheet attached below. I have a few of these that were donated to me during the Ainslie testing. They are pretty inexpensive: