Overunity.com Archives is Temporarily on Read Mode Only!



Free Energy will change the World - Free Energy will stop Climate Change - Free Energy will give us hope
and we will not surrender until free energy will be enabled all over the world, to power planes, cars, ships and trains.
Free energy will help the poor to become independent of needing expensive fuels.
So all in all Free energy will bring far more peace to the world than any other invention has already brought to the world.
Those beautiful words were written by Stefan Hartmann/Owner/Admin at overunity.com
Unfortunately now, Stefan Hartmann is very ill and He needs our help
Stefan wanted that I have all these massive data to get it back online
even being as ill as Stefan is, he transferred all databases and folders
that without his help, this Forum Archives would have never been published here
so, please, as the Webmaster and Creator of these Archives, I am asking that you help him
by making a donation on the Paypal Button above.
You can visit us or register at my main site at:
Overunity Machines Forum



Partnered Output Coils - Free Energy

Started by EMJunkie, January 16, 2015, 12:08:38 AM

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 146 Guests are viewing this topic.

Brian516

If I had put nearly two decades of my time, effort, frustration, and funding to get to where I am now, and I had learned and created something outstanding, I really don't think I would just throw it all out there for everyone like so many people are expecting him to do right now.  I mean, did Floyd Sweet, Bill Muller, JB, or any of those guys just GIVE away every bit of their life's work and their finished product's design specs to everyone??  I don't think so..... they gave people enough material to get started down the path that they took and expected everyone to learn for themselves and do their own homework.   That's why we don't have very many working replications of their inventions!! That is why people are STILL working on figuring out how to do what they did.

But I do understand people's frustrations when it comes to the whole "Open Sourcing your inventions".... at this point in time more than ever, people are going crazy trying to figure this stuff out, and now that the internet is around, people are able hound the living $#!+ out of modern day inventors..  Floyd Sweet, Bill Muller, and all the others would probably have to deal with the exact same thing if they had the internet when they were around.  JB had to deal with this nonsense, and that's why you hardly hear from him on these forums anymore. All you people with your "JUST GIVE ME THE DA** ANSWERS AND SCHEMATICS RIGHT NOW" are driving off all of the people that actually know what they are doing and want to help us achieve our goals!!!!

picowatt

Quote from: EMJunkie on February 04, 2015, 09:42:08 PM
Yeah, again I hear you, see what youre saying, I agree... But:

From 0 Volts Terminal to Point C we have 3.3 Watts

From 0 Volts Terminal to Point B we have 1.4 Watts

But Across the Load we have only 0.68 Watts

So do you see where I am going with this?

We gain 1.3 Watts when Measuring relative from the 0 Volts Terminal, from Input to Output, not loose it!



We should see, 1.4 Watts (Input) - 0.68 (Output) = Total Power Relative used from 0 Volts Terminal

But we see, 1.4 Watts (Input) + 0.68 Watts (Load Power) + 1.3 Watts (Unknown) = Total Power Relative used from 0 Volts Terminal = 3.3 Watts Measured

EDIT: I mean, the point here is, we Measure Power from the Positive Terminal, relative to the 0 Volts Terminal don't we, so, we should be able to account for all power from the 0 Volts Terminal!

EMJ,

The first thing I would do is to connect a decent HF cap (ceramic, etc) between your V+ and 0v as close to the components as possible.  Also, reduce all component interconnecting wire lengths.  Why does "overunity" always require clip leads?  Think "impedance", not "resistance". 

To those that have been here a while, this sounds all too familiar...

PW

MarkE

Quote from: picowatt on February 04, 2015, 10:20:12 PM
EMJ,

The first thing I would do is to connect a decent HF cap (ceramic, etc) between your V+ and 0v as close to the components as possible.  Also, reduce all component interconnecting wire lengths.  Why does "overunity" always require clip leads?  Think "impedance", not "resistance". 

To those that have been here a while, this sounds all too familiar...

PW
We know about your kind with your Brute Squads rounding up and eliminating innocent stray inductances and forcing your pig decoupling capacitors upon the unsuspecting.  No rat's nest is safe when your jack booted thugs come to town clearing them out in the name of "measurement purity".  Yours is the kind that destroyed Steven Jones 8X overunity JT circuit.  Now, just because EMJ wants to move his probes around, you'll likely get on his case for using a 6" ground clip to a node that isn't on the branch he says he is measuring instead of a coaxial connection to a node that is on the branch.  And what will you do when you have these machines where you want them?  You'll hook them up to the measurement machines and take all the overunity out of them, just like that.  How can anyone stand such cruelty to clip leads?

EMJunkie

Quote from: MarkE on February 04, 2015, 10:08:37 PM
To all appearances you made that decision a loooooong time befire PIH123 posted on this thread.  We can all enjoy popcorn and watch as you continue to screw with the people who still think you are sincere.

I don't care what you think MarkE, think what you like, eat as much Popcorn as you like  ;) Have fun  ;) Weight Watchers: 13 19 97

Pirate88179

Quote from: Brian516 on February 04, 2015, 10:18:24 PM
If I had put nearly two decades of my time, effort, frustration, and funding to get to where I am now, and I had learned and created something outstanding, I really don't think I would just throw it all out there for everyone like so many people are expecting him to do right now.  I mean, did Floyd Sweet, Bill Muller, JB, or any of those guys just GIVE away every bit of their life's work and their finished product's design specs to everyone??  I don't think so..... they gave people enough material to get started down the path that they took and expected everyone to learn for themselves and do their own homework.   That's why we don't have very many working replications of their inventions!! That is why people are STILL working on figuring out how to do what they did.

But I do understand people's frustrations when it comes to the whole "Open Sourcing your inventions".... at this point in time more than ever, people are going crazy trying to figure this stuff out, and now that the internet is around, people are able hound the living $#!+ out of modern day inventors..  Floyd Sweet, Bill Muller, and all the others would probably have to deal with the exact same thing if they had the internet when they were around.  JB had to deal with this nonsense, and that's why you hardly hear from him on these forums anymore. All you people with your "JUST GIVE ME THE DA** ANSWERS AND SCHEMATICS RIGHT NOW" are driving off all of the people that actually know what they are doing and want to help us achieve our goals!!!!

Ummm...Brian...this is an OPEN SOURCE website.  That means...full disclosure of your device. (If you actually have one)  If one does not want to do that....perhaps they should choose a site that is not OPEN SOURCE.

It is not an Almost open source site, or a somewhat open source site...it is OPEN SOURCE which requires full disclosure.

I hope this clears things up a bit.

Bill
See the Joule thief Circuit Diagrams, etc. topic here:
http://www.overunity.com/index.php?topic=6942.0;topicseen