Overunity.com Archives is Temporarily on Read Mode Only!



Free Energy will change the World - Free Energy will stop Climate Change - Free Energy will give us hope
and we will not surrender until free energy will be enabled all over the world, to power planes, cars, ships and trains.
Free energy will help the poor to become independent of needing expensive fuels.
So all in all Free energy will bring far more peace to the world than any other invention has already brought to the world.
Those beautiful words were written by Stefan Hartmann/Owner/Admin at overunity.com
Unfortunately now, Stefan Hartmann is very ill and He needs our help
Stefan wanted that I have all these massive data to get it back online
even being as ill as Stefan is, he transferred all databases and folders
that without his help, this Forum Archives would have never been published here
so, please, as the Webmaster and Creator of these Archives, I am asking that you help him
by making a donation on the Paypal Button above.
You can visit us or register at my main site at:
Overunity Machines Forum



Partnered Output Coils - Free Energy

Started by EMJunkie, January 16, 2015, 12:08:38 AM

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 71 Guests are viewing this topic.

TinselKoala

I have now tried _all_ the Horizontal deflection transistors I listed, with the exception of the ST 2001HI which does not have an internal diode. Most "work", some oscillate improperly, some clip the negative going portion of the ringdown. The ones that "work" produce high-amplitude spikes, even greater than 3kV, _when properly driven_. All require a lot more drive from the FG than the mosfet does.

My Interstate F43 FG is capable of a lot more drive output than most modern FGs, remember.

The scopeshot from EMJunkie shows an _underdriven_ transistor. Here are two quick screenshots from my test with the 2sd2539, simply subbed into the socket of my testbed. Recall that I have a 100K pulldown resistor from Base to Negative Rail. The shots are taken at 6.7 V in from the power supply, and are shown at 200 V/div vertical scaling, with the 100x probe connected to TP A (the top of the load/CVR combo). Test is at approx. 1.73 kHz, FG is isolated.

The first one, most similar to EMJ's, is with inadequate drive from the FG.

Second one is with more drive. 


PIH123

Quote from: TinselKoala on February 05, 2015, 04:59:23 PM
So tell me which one of these is "close enough" so that I won't be _wasting my time_ following WRONG SCHEMATICS trying to replicate BAD MEASUREMENTS.

I refer you to page 61 post 905

Quote
1. What is the exact circuit under test ?
2. What are the component manufacturers and part numbers used ?
3. Where you sourced them would be useful but not required.
4. What equipment did you use to test ?
5. What settings on that equipment ?
6. Where was that equipment connected to the circuit.


He replied that he was not interested in providing that info until people "Understood" what effects were going on.
Six pages later, same old, same old.
He was here to teach remember, what a joke.

Oh, and by the way, he has wasted nobody's time because you are doing this voluntarily.
You are a "greedy selfish person" if you want this info (post number 911).

TinselKoala

Here's another shot with the 2sd2539. Top trace is the TP A voltage, 50 V/div, 100x probe. Bottom trace is the FG signal, 1 V/div, 10x probe. This is _severely underdriving_ the transistor, which is causing the lower amplitude group of ringing between the larger groups. Horizontal scale is 100 microsecs/div.

EMJunkie

Quote from: ramset on February 05, 2015, 05:18:19 AM
Tinsel
your time and efforts are greatly appreciated here ,your willingness to explore and
experiment are a tremendous asset to this community,especially when combined with constructive input.
some of us are going to try to get your equipment from Canada
so you can do even more here,also I have read that you need a Scope [about 400.00].


Note **we already have some financial commitments for this equipment move from Canada
still more needed , many hands make light work.


and the newer scope is a recent development .

any parties interested in assisting us in this venture please PM myself or Mark Dansie


or Email ChetKremens@gmail.com


with the proper equipment some very interesting Things can be explored
right here ,and perhaps some new text can be added to the books....


respectfully
Chet
PS
I might add ...Many persons wish they could explore and experiment at the level being demonstrated here...
we cannot all be skilled in all fields,but we can do our part by supporting Men that have the skills to do the experiments in an honest and sincere fashion.

There are some really interesting experiments that need doing ,this stressing the fields as well as the cores and doing what seems counter intuitive has Merit.

here we have SOME cooperation ,  it is a very nice model and it works ....


please help,....we can make this MUCH better.


TK, Chet and ALL - This can be improved on tremendously! It doesn't work with just Square Wave input, but this is where we see more effects!

If we all Band together, with all our out expertise in the areas that we all have, then yes in a few Months time we could ALL have working devices that are tremendously better than what we have just seen!

Please ask, Where does the Spike/Ringing come from!

TinselKoala

Quote from: PIH123 on February 05, 2015, 05:44:56 PM
I refer you to page 61 post 905


He replied that he was not interested in providing that info until people "Understood" what effects were going on.
Six pages later, same old, same old.
He was here to teach remember, what a joke.

Oh, and by the way, he has wasted nobody's time because you are doing this voluntarily.
You are a "greedy selfish person" if you want this info (post number 911).

I am "voluntarily" examining some claims, that is true. If I am given outrageously wrong information with which to conduct my examination... then I am wasting my time, and yours too.