Partnered Output Coils - Free Energy

[EMJunkie]

LOL, there is nothing of value behind your curtain.  But it is fun to watch you try to screw with people by pretending that you have something of value.

And that's where your Drug is, isn't it! Some funny strange made up Game in your Head!

Let me ask you, in the statement:

"If the directions of the two signals are such that opposite H-fields cancel and E-fields add, an apparently steady E-field will be created. The energy density of the fields remain as calculated above, but the value of the E-field will double from E/2 to E. It is a simple matter using the equations E/H= √με and c=  1/√με for a team wave to get rid of H and c and so convert the first equation into the well known equation for energy density in the so-called electrostatic field"

What is E/2

Gee, this is going to be Interesting!

[EMJunkie]

    My friend at CERN. knows the odd thing or two about employing bucking coils.
Some think it's a waste of money but I appreciate the spin off's.
    You've got to be good when you get to that level, not many places where the
restaurant has a menu in about thirty languages.
   In industry devices have been used for decades that employ the principles
being discussed here-there's not much that hasn't been investigated!
          John.

@John, appreciate your point of view. Problem is, when one looks for marbles in the lolly jar, the lolly's don't get considered.

Could it be, instead of looking at driving Currents, we look at Inducing currents with the same methodologies!

We are all guilty of this no matter how many languages we speak!

  Chris

[EMJunkie]

@ALL

Let me ask you, in the statement:

"If the directions of the two signals are such that opposite H-fields cancel and E-fields add, an apparently steady E-field will be created. The energy density of the fields remain as calculated above, but the value of the E-field will double from E/2 to E. It is a simple matter using the equations E/H= √με and c=  1/√με for a team wave to get rid of H and c and so convert the first equation into the well known equation for energy density in the so-called electrostatic field"

What is E/2

I will think of a Prize for the Winner  Must be the best answer, not the first!

What is E/2

[MarkE]

And that's where your Drug is, isn't it! Some funny strange made up Game in your Head!

Let me ask you, in the statement:

"If the directions of the two signals are such that opposite H-fields cancel and E-fields add, an apparently steady E-field will be created. The energy density of the fields remain as calculated above, but the value of the E-field will double from E/2 to E. It is a simple matter using the equations E/H= √με and c=  1/√με for a team wave to get rid of H and c and so convert the first equation into the well known equation for energy density in the so-called electrostatic field"

What is E/2

Gee, this is going to be Interesting!

It's not my silly statement.  It is more gobbledegook you have posted without any context.   

Given a pair of transformer windings there are only four terminals and a limited number of ways to connect those terminals:  Series: voltages add, parallel (windings must be matched) currents add, or bucking voltages subtract.  There is no magic and no free energy in any of the configurations.  Each configuration has been used for decades and decades.

[EMJunkie]

It's not my silly statement.  It is more gobbledegook you have posted without any context.   

Given a pair of transformer windings there are only four terminals and a limited number of ways to connect those terminals:  Series: voltages add, parallel (windings must be matched) currents add, or bucking voltages subtract.  There is no magic and no free energy in any of the configurations.  Each configuration has been used for decades and decades.

@MarkE - If one thinks about it, it is not "gobbledegook"! Its a very valid statement, its valid in any inductor in any Transformer.