Partnered Output Coils - Free Energy

[EMJunkie]

Putting 4X current through 2/7.3X resistance yields power dissipation of 32/7.3, or greater than 4X as before while the operating force doubled.  IOW, the efficiency fell in half and the solenoid will burn up its insulation.  If driven with the voltage scaled for constant power loss:  V = 5 * (2/7.3)^0.5, then the force and power dissipation would have remained essentially constant.  IOW, the "innovation" offers no improvement in the actual usable capability of the solenoid.  One could have driven the original winding at 10V yielding 2X current and gotten the same 340g force and had the same 4X power dissipation all without ever touching any of the windings.   All the author has managed to do is overdrive the solenoid.

It does not bode well that you don't seem to understand that.

MARKE!!! OMG!!!

You have missed it all, and also have the wrong information in this post.....

Do you feel ok?? Un-well I must assume?

Please READ and Understand the context of the Post I made before making Rubbish posts that have incorrect/Mixed up information!!

Goodness me you're loosing it old mate! Poor old MileHigh, he is so far up yours that he did not pick it up either!!!

   Chris

[EMJunkie]

So I take it you are no longer arguing in support of EMJ's refuted ideas but wish to make an ad hom attack on me.  Nice. 

EMJ's claims have collapsed for their own lack of merit.  EMJ has most recently offered as support for his ideas:  1) A paper by a person who clearly did not understand the basics of the subject matter their paper concerned, 2) Which did not utilize the method that EMJ is promoting, and 3) EMJ apparently tid not uderstand only reinforced established evidence against his claims.

MarkE - Assumptions are your forte aren't they!!!

AC has never argued for or against me or you! Please learn to READ!!!

MarkE, more embarrassment again by the looks of things!!!

GOON Squad Leader!

[allcanadian]

@Mark

We can sum it up as:  We have huge amounts of evidence that contradict EMJ's
claims while EMJ offers no reliable evidence that support his extraordinary
claims.  Therefore EMJ's extraordinary claims are false. 

I believe that's what I just said, you cannot believe it therefore it cannot be true. I don't believe you have ever seen the actual device in person nor have you ever tested the device in person therefore by your rules you don't actually have any real evidence do you Mark?. What you have is hersay and speculation you believe is evidence which any credible person would most likely reject and I do. I have seen no real evidence I consider proof presented by anyone here to date.
Unless of course you can show evidence you have seen it in person and thoughly tested it to rigorous standards but somehow I think your just flying by the seat of your pants. I also found your last post interesting, it's funny how you can degrade and belittle others without conscience in your posts and you call this criticism however whenever they do anything remotely close to you it is an attack. Have you ever wondered why that is Mark?.

EMJ's claims have collapsed for their own lack of merit.  EMJ has most recently
offered as support for his ideas:  1) A paper by a person who clearly did not
understand the basics of the subject matter their paper concerned, 2) Which did
not utilize the method that EMJ is promoting, and 3) EMJ apparently tid not
uderstand only reinforced established evidence against his claims.

You must have been really worked up as you have quite a few typo's there.... relax it's ok. First I love how many here like to exaggerate their releveance such as your grand proclamation that .... "EMJ's claims have collapsed for their own lack of merit". I mean wow I thought it was some kind of news flash that a bridge or building had just collapsed. Fortunately no, nothing has collapsed as I have seen no real evidence nor proof either way to date to convince me of anything. Sure I find it interesting and I'm still undecided however that's about as far as I'm willing to go at this point because I just don't know and neither do you.
AC

[EMJunkie]

Putting 4X current through 2/7.3X resistance yields power dissipation of 32/7.3, or greater than 4X as before while the operating force doubled.  IOW, the efficiency fell in half and the solenoid will burn up its insulation.  If driven with the voltage scaled for constant power loss:  V = 5 * (2/7.3)^0.5, then the force and power dissipation would have remained essentially constant.  IOW, the "innovation" offers no improvement in the actual usable capability of the solenoid.  One could have driven the original winding at 10V yielding 2X current and gotten the same 340g force and had the same 4X power dissipation all without ever touching any of the windings.   All the author has managed to do is overdrive the solenoid.

It does not bode well that you don't seem to understand that.

For so many reasons, this (MarkE's typical Piffle of Direa) and the AMAZing TinselKoala's Mathmatical Assumptions with all their INCORRECTNESS is really a preposterous piffle of GOON Idiocy's from Certifiable Ignorant LOONAtics!!!

    1: Your Mathematical Assumptions (If you had the right information) are just a disgraces!!

    2: You have no Experimental Evidence! I do!!!

   3: Your arguments are already shown to be full of Lies and falsity's so you are not Trustworthy!!!

Three facts that already show you both, along with MileHigh and BillBoBaggins (Terribly Inbred), are just Trolls and cant possibly be Trusted as people that will openly view factual evidence!!!

This, and the last few posts, yet again, show to all, that you simply do not understand, and cannot understand the Concepts I have bought to this forum! You four are a Terrible Discrase to the Human Race (TDHR) - for the Youngies!

Why? One might ask! Simply because you CHOOSE not to!!!

[MileHigh]

Chris:

You say Mark's math is wrong?  You say things are incorrect and preposterous?

Then by all means, go ahead and correct his math.  State what he is saying is incorrect and correct it.  State what he is saying is preposterous and comment on it.  You say he is lying?  Go ahead and state where he is lying and correct it.

In other words, rebut his points and show your work.

The floor is yours.

MileHigh