Partnered Output Coils - Free Energy

[tinman]

Timnan:

I will leave you in the excellent hands of Mark and PW.

MileHigh

A box that says "shorting circuit" is not a valid part of your electrical schematic.

Maybe not,but thats all your getting MH-you need no more than what i have supplied to calculate P/in and P/out. The P/in and P/out are definitive.

You can put an extra 15% into your efforts to make your presentation clear and comprehensible.

As we are only looking into power in and power dissipated across a load,then all the information you need is right there.

I flat-out refuse to invest 500% more energy on my side into understanding your circuit than I should have to because you are too lazy to present your data properly.

Im lazy MH ?.
I have posted a schematic that shows where and how the power measurements are taken. The video clearly shows the results of these measurements.
You seem to need spoon feeding MH before you can see what is in front of you.

You already see the questions being posed to you to try to fill in the holes.

Here is that question MH.
Quote MarkE: Could you do me a favor and post a hand sketch that shows the measurement connections, and the external circuit (no secrets exposed) with the lamp connected and disconnected?  I don't want you to reveal any details of the motor or the control circuit.  Thanks.

This is exactly what i have done MH,so what hole's do i have to fill?.

What you are doing is digging for a complete circuit,and exact workings of the device-->not going to happen.
Who know's,maybe the magnets are going flat

[MileHigh]

Tinman:

I didn't know that I had to take notes when watching your clip.  You point to various individual measurements but you make no attempt to pull everything together into a coordinated presentation.  I suppose if I watched your clip two, three, or four times then I would be able to connect all the dots and do all the math and see what is going on.  I don't have that level of patience.  My criticism of your presentation is 100% valid and it does force your audience to incur an extra workload and compounds the frustration of people that are willing to work with you to try to figure out what is going on.  You are lucky that you are working with people that have so much patience and have so much deep knowledge in electronics.

I am not worried about your "technology."  I can just look at what you are doing and know what the ultimate outcome of this exercise is going to be.  Some oversight or mistake will be found and the whole thing will go into the file for another misfire.

Here is the real deal and this is a level of insight that you either can't see or refuse to see:  Thee is no possible combination of motors, coils, resistors, capacitors, transformers, funky strange transformers, transistors, MOSFETs and diodes that can give you more energy out than in - period.

I have taken the Spice and I have blue eyes and I can navigate through the circuit just like that.  I ran Spice with big stacks of punched computer cards held together with elastic bands.  What I am saying is the real deal.

Mark and PW will show you the way.

MileHigh

[MileHigh]

This is just as valid as an i7 with a fancy GUI.

[tinman]

Tinman:

    You are lucky that you are working with people that have so much patience and have so much deep knowledge in electronics.


MileHigh

I didn't know that I had to take notes when watching your clip.  You point to various individual measurements but you make no attempt to pull everything together into a coordinated presentation.

We could argue all day MH,but it's like i said-i went through the whole setup before i started the motor. I clearly stated that the yellow trace on the scope was showing the voltage across the motor,and the DMM that was reading the current flowing into the motor. I also clearly stated that the blue trace on the scope was showing the voltage across the globe,and which DMM was showing the current flowing through the globe.
Post from woopy reply 3668-quote: If i understand correctly , when there is no load, the motor draws about 27.7 watts (13.4 volts x 2.07 A )

when the bulb is on your motor draws about 10 watts ( 13.4 V x 0.75 A ) and the generator produces about 18 watts (10.4 V x 1.64 A)

Why is woopy able to produce accurate measurements from the video MH,and you cannot?.

I suppose if I watched your clip two, three, or four times then I would be able to connect all the dots and do all the math and see what is going on.  I don't have that level of patience.  My criticism of your presentation is 100% valid and it does force your audience to incur an extra workload and compounds the frustration of people that are willing to work with you to try to figure out what is going on.

Is it really to much effort on your behalf MH to do two simple multiplications ?
I have seen no frustration from anyone other than your self. You say you dont have that much patience?,well turning on your computer and navigating to this thread would take more work than the two simple sum's you had to do to obtain the P/in P/out figures.

I am not worried about your "technology."  I can just look at what you are doing and know what the ultimate outcome of this exercise is going to be.  Some oversight or mistake will be found and the whole thing will go into the file for another misfire.

And how can you know this when you cant even do two simple multiplications ?

Here is the real deal and this is a level of insight that you either can't see or refuse to see:  Thee is no possible combination of motors, coils, resistors, capacitors, transformers, funky strange transformers, transistors, MOSFETs and diodes that can give you more energy out than in - period.

I will rephrase the above so as it is correct.
There is no possible combination of motors, coils, resistors, capacitors, transformers, funky strange transformers, transistors, MOSFETs, diodes(and undefined items) that i know of that can give you more energy out than in.

I have taken the Spice and I have blue eyes and I can navigate through the circuit just like that.  I ran Spice with big stacks of punched computer cards held together with elastic bands.  What I am saying is the real deal.

What you are saying MH is, to the best of my knowledge,i know of no combination that will produce more power out than what the system is consuming.
You would also be one of those that thinks nothing travels faster than the speed of light,even though there is proof that this is not true. These are the times you slap your self in the face and say-dam,it was there right in front of my eyes all the time-->why didnt i see it?.

Mark and PW will show you the way.

Will they?
To be up front and honest,i dont think MarkE will stray from what he has been taught to be true,and so he will keep searching until he finds something that will explain what is going on using conventional theory,and this will keep him from working out what is really happening within the device. PW on the other hand i believe is still open minded enough to stand back and work out how it is doing what it is doing. Many here that go by the book also seem to think that the TPU was legit,and functioned as presented. So how is it that they can believe in the TPU's function,but also believe that current theories stand?.

So MH,do you believe that nothing travels faster than the speed of light ?,or do you believe that statement to be rubbish?.

[EMJunkie]

Tinman presents his device, rather well done if I may say!!!

Poor Tinman cops the Wrath of the Ignorant!

Tinman is now getting Ostracised because he shows something amazing by the now few, Ignorant!

See why I refuse to give these Fools any Data Tinman!

   Chris Sykes
       hyiq.org

P.S: You people should be Utterly Ashamed of yourselves! How childish of you supposed Adults! The Human Race could certainly do without you bunch!!!