Partnered Output Coils - Free Energy

[hoptoad]

Voltage = R A T I O of energy to charge.  Voltage <> energy.  Voltage <> charge.  If one does not define a specific quantity of charge, then one cannot relate a specific voltage to any specific value of energy.  Try to wiggle all you want.

Since you are so insistent, you best go the site I linked to and get them to change their definition so that RATIO is the paramount point of their definition. In all this you have lost site of the fact that you are verifying that voltage is intrinsic to the measurement of electrical energy.
If voltage is the ratio of energy to charge, then energy is also a ratio of voltage to charge. Charge being the only factor which is non variable.

The point I've been making is simple. You claim there is no energy IN voltage. Yet your maths ratio shows an explicit relationship between the two. Then to top it off, an independent source that I cite makes no mention of, nor highlights ratio, it just references Potential Energy measured for an arbitrary unit. All measurements are based upon arbitrary units. So what ?

[MarkE]

What problems with accurate and unambiguous readings are caused by modern test gear?

The most commmon problems are aliasing effects, and limited waveform capture rates.  Newer digital scopes have much higher capture rates: the number of waveforms that the scope can capture each second than older and less expensive devices.  A good example of people getting thrown off the rails by "scoposcopy" was Rosemary Ainslie and Aaron Murakami looking at a very simple low side driver circuit timed by a venerable 555 timer chip.  No matter how many times TK tried to straighten them out, they insisted that the garbage on their instruments' displays was an accurate depiction of the circuit waveforms which it was not.

[MarkE]

Yes it dose. All you have to do is state that you know PM's cant do useful work.I will then post the description(and a rough sketch) of the experiment that will show you PM's doing useful work.

Like lots of things, such as even a lifted rock, there are many permanent magnet arrangements that can release energy once: taking the system from a higher energy potential to a lower energy potential.  Over a closed cycle where the system energy potential returns to its starting point is another matter.

[Spilled Fluids]

The most commmon problems are aliasing effects, and limited waveform capture rates.  Newer digital scopes have much higher capture rates: the number of waveforms that the scope can capture each second than older and less expensive devices.  A good example of people getting thrown off the rails by "scoposcopy" was Rosemary Ainslie and Aaron Murakami looking at a very simple low side driver circuit timed by a venerable 555 timer chip.  No matter how many times TK tried to straighten them out, they insisted that the garbage on their instruments' displays was an accurate depiction of the circuit waveforms which it was not.

Yes these are the problems. It's the same with digital music vs analog music. Analog music is complete as captured but digital music is just the analog music sliced and diced then put back together. There is always something lost in the translation. Same goes for scopes or other digital measuring systems.
I'm sorry I missed your question.

[Spilled Fluids]

Like lots of things, such as even a lifted rock, there are many permanent magnet arrangements that can release energy once: taking the system from a higher energy potential to a lower energy potential.  Over a closed cycle where the system energy potential returns to its starting point is another matter.

A lifted rock, once dropped cannot lift itself back up and a compressed spring, once released cannot compress itself. Same should apply to permanent magnets.