Partnered Output Coils - Free Energy

[EMJunkie]

Now sir, you are choosing to believe that I made a choice when I did not,  as I chose neither neither Helen's nor Graeme's perceptions as reality and said they were both a "point of view" of events.

Perhaps your preconceived notions got in the way of a clear headed response. I never implied Helen's version was a delusion, you read that into it from those notions while  the sentence that followed was referring to something quite different.

"The easiest person to fool is yourself" RPF

Maybe that makes the sentence I wrote about "delusion" clearer.

Vortex, maybe your choice of words in character with the context was a distraction of meaning?

We now see how easy it is to perceive the unintended? I too saw your response as a little "Cup half Empty" rather than "Cup half Full" response. Apologies, I misunderstood what you wrote

   Chris Sykes
       hyiq.org

[Pirate88179]

well
I found out why Minnie cuts down all his trees

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gEaAmUDEiGo

Ha ha!  Chet, that was excellent Sir.

Bill

[tinman]

Now sir, you are choosing to believe that I made a choice when I did not,  as I chose neither neither Helen's nor Graeme's perceptions as reality and said they were both a "point of view" of events. I never even mentioned Helen's or Graeme's name nor implied that either one was delusional. The second sentence was a non sequitur, a different idea stated for a different purpose,  unrelated to the story.

Perhaps your preconceived notions got in the way of an accurate assessment. I never implied Helen's version was a delusion, nor Graeme's. You read that into it from those notions while  the sentence that followed was referring to something quite different. Go back and read it and show me where I said Helen was delusional.

Isn't that interesting!

"The easiest person to fool is yourself" RPF

Maybe that makes the sentence I wrote about "delusion" clearer.

Maybe different paragraphs would help when talking about two different things-as you did in your post before the last.

The point is this-there are now lies or delusions within that event as your single paragraph represents. Many here laugh at, and mok EMJ, but the fact is , he is basically right in what he is trying to put forward.

[verpies]

Graham Gunderson (Good Work Graham!!!)
Hidden Link: http://grahamgunderson.com/ou
Interview: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lwbnMSIBTi8
Image: http://s25.postimg.org/mkx1qro5r/gunderson1.jpg
Forum: http://www.energeticforum.com/energy-conference/20200-graham-gunderson-transformer.html

So, did anyone have a look at Gunderson's transformer ?

[EMJunkie]

Many here laugh at, and mok EMJ, but the fact is , he is basically right in what he is trying to put forward.

@Tinman - Thank You!

I have thick Skin!

It is sad that so many are so complacent in their realities that abound their daily lives! Engineers that could not engineer their way to the top of a Ladder, Genius's that could not logically think their way out of a Paper Bag, EE's that do not even know how the Circuits they build are Powered, Scientists that have not an idea on how Energy is Invoked, Physicist's that have no way of explaining how Induction is satisfied in any rational way.

You, my friend, are a Giant, thinking Practically and Sensibly, Experiments at the absolute highest level of understanding - Outstanding work Tinman.

My Posts are slow because Stefan still has me on Moderation! I am ok with this, because it appears that My Fellow Rival is at bay, so this the price we pay for some peace and rational on topic chat.

Congratulations!!!

   Chris Sykes
       hyiq.org