Overunity.com Archives is Temporarily on Read Mode Only!



Free Energy will change the World - Free Energy will stop Climate Change - Free Energy will give us hope
and we will not surrender until free energy will be enabled all over the world, to power planes, cars, ships and trains.
Free energy will help the poor to become independent of needing expensive fuels.
So all in all Free energy will bring far more peace to the world than any other invention has already brought to the world.
Those beautiful words were written by Stefan Hartmann/Owner/Admin at overunity.com
Unfortunately now, Stefan Hartmann is very ill and He needs our help
Stefan wanted that I have all these massive data to get it back online
even being as ill as Stefan is, he transferred all databases and folders
that without his help, this Forum Archives would have never been published here
so, please, as the Webmaster and Creator of these Archives, I am asking that you help him
by making a donation on the Paypal Button above.
You can visit us or register at my main site at:
Overunity Machines Forum



Partnered Output Coils - Free Energy

Started by EMJunkie, January 16, 2015, 12:08:38 AM

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 151 Guests are viewing this topic.

The.Truth

@ramset,

I believe your partner in crimes against humanity are the ones to be providing evidence:

Quote

My self ,and a group of very talented people spent 2 to 3 months working on such parametric circuits not to long ago.
We were getting results with COPs in excess of 200%.

What i will tell you is that current can follow paths not considered to exist. After months of testing,we found that a portion of the input power can travel through mid air. This is the portion of P/in they are missing-they being the people in your posted papers.

There are two self running devices that i know of,and have seen running in person--but you simply will not see such devices on public forums such as this one,nor on youtube.

These are not overunity devices,but more so devices with an !unknown! power source. One of them is quite cleverly done,and extreemly simple to build. The other is more complex,and would take a well skilled machinist to construct,and a half decent EE to build the required circuits.

The first machine make use of room temperature nitanol springs-nothing out of the ordinary there,but how he is able to create the required temperature difference without consuming any power is the clever bit.

The second,more complex machine is a bit more baffling.
I have !as yet! been unable to work out as to why it continuse to run once the power source is removed,while driving the equivalent to a 320 watt load. This 320 watts i calculated quickly by how much water was raised a set hight in a given amount of time--so it is a !round about! calculation.

But as i said,these are the machines you will not find here on public forums.


Brad



It is evident that tinman does not know what 'parametric' defines. After all, any non-linear change in inductance, which is the basic outline of this very thread, over the course of time is by very definition, parametric in nature.

If any evicence is to be presented, it is in support that you have not plagiarized this very thread.

My employer is looking to expose the people not abiding by simple truths. It appears you have exposed yourself.

Our film crew is filming these posts. All this information is going in the book. Still you cant pull yourself together to be truthful.

ramset

Well //
Lets look at facts not fiction

Anonymous Doxxer  presents Partnered Output Coils - Free Energy while wearing a truth suit.
and not one member here can step forward and show this as true .

NOT ONE ,and all who tried and failed were slandered as MIB's or [including Stefan Hartman]  ??
I am done engaging with you until you share your Name as I have done here.
as I mentioned before you write in the same manner as the claimant and your membership drive hereshould be hopefully good for you !!
at the end of the day ...the truth will set you free

Post one example of a successful replication of the Tittle Partnered Output Coils - Free Energy----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
EDIT//I see you continue your LARP below [thx to SL for new vocabulary] //,as mentioned here few days ago By Tinman no true self running free energy device . << thats a period there //
as mentioned to you in Email last week // Graham Gunderson COP 5-6 [in measurements?//but will not self run //an output of 5 to 6 times input // but will not self run//measurement error is easy//self run with gain [which any true Free energy device should do //not so easy// end of story
///Mr.hiding anonymous Doxxer wearing suit of truth stop pointing to others "attempts" and slandering all !! //For clarity/////////////////////////////////////////////......//////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////.///////////////..these things you do here.... Slander and Doxxing are violations of TOS in any forum / just for clarity.////////////////////////////////
and lastly for cameras //hacking Stefan's forum is also against the law ,claimant says it was not him personally ,just man claiming to be his friend !! friend hacked forum and posted for claimant in old posts here//""under claimants username""....but there was much more that was done// much more//but we'll leave that for now!!///...
I would advise any new members to claimants forum to be wary or hackings
Whats for yah ne're go bye yah
Thanks Grandma

The.Truth

@ramset,

Your own definition of truth and proof appears to be somewhat tangled with missunderstanding.

It is your hairy little australian that seems to have brought about the requirement of proof, for his wondrous closed door claims of plagiarism.

I seek truth, The.Truth is:

    1: January 16, 2015 - Chris presents Partnered Output Coils on this forum, requirement is One input coil, two output coils in bucking mode.
    2: June 19, 2015 - tinman presents his Rotary Transformer. It consists of one input coil, two output coils, output coils buck while in operation.
    3: July 12, 2016 - Graham Gunderson demonstrates his MIT. Also consisting of one input coil, and two output coils. Both output coils are in bucking mode at peak current.

The.Truth is, simply, Chris got it right, plain and simple.

The.Truth is, you and tinman arranged for the removal of a man that was sharing more with humanity, than any other before him!

SolarLab

F.Y.I.

Relates to this "Q phenomena" and the increase in forum chaos - might be O.T. -

Not being the "sharpest knife in the drawer," I tend to just slug along in a myopic state looking for the elusive
"extra energy" holy grail.

Having a new tool set (CAE with the mathematics exposed, thus one can modify the equations) adds another
exciting dimension to the search. Since the alternate energy forums are currently the only real place to discuss
developments; these forums would likely be the most logical platform to introduce the use of this new CAE tool
and the resulting analytics.

BUT; while looking through the various discussions for a good introduction thread there appeared to be an alarming
pattern that was starting to surface - some of the old established members and a number of the newer participants
seem to be exhibiting a rather strange behaviour - obvious and blatent dis-information, outright hostility directed
towards the introduction of any new form of valuable information, or the re-sufacing of older research that could
contribute to newly unearthed concepts.

SO; after pondering this somewhat bazaar trend for a bit I consulted a more worldly friend a while back and she
directed me to these links found below. At first I found it all a bit over-whelming but upon further detailed study
the overall scheme became more clear which then began to explain this, possibly perceived, strange behavior.

Considering the impact that readily available excess energy devices would have on society; considering that it appears
such devices are very near to being market ready (see Melnichenko, Ruslan, Rossi, etc.); considering initial CAE analysis,
of at least some of these devices, shows absolute promise; and considering the plus and minus dollar impacts, combined
with the stuff I was pointed to, it now makes sense, at least for me!

Some of the slogans caught me as well, for example: "dark to light;" "they need us divided;" "dis-information is key;"
"information warfare;" "stand together;" "stay united;" and more. Of course this "Great Awakening" global war is labelled
a conspiracy and such by the establishment (we're used to that label), however, this "WWG1WGA" so called cult is the only
cult I know of that encourages and fosters a message of "Think For Yourself!"

As for me, the jury is still out; but it appears most of these "Q" people have hope at least and are having fun at worst;
plus a lot of this stuff makes some good common sense and it might also tie in with my (perceived) recent forum
observations (?). I tend not to be political at all but I am curious as heck...   

Anyway, the links she provided for more study: 

https://qmap.pub/?pg=1  follow the index down the Left Hand side (lot of work put into this). 

https://8ch.net/qresearch/welcome.html    an overview sort of.   

https://8ch.net/qresearch/catalog.html   this one is tricky - select the first "Q Research General" (Marines-Flag for
real-time postings; Caution, it's brutal uncensored 8Chan). 

https://qntmpkts.keybase.pub//   real time "Q" posts - only when Q posts but is auto updated. 

Sorry for the "off topic;" but - is it off topic?    Lots of fun to watch (get the popcorn)! 

FIN

The.Truth

It is obvious, Chris knew your tactics. Chris played you all at every step, he exposed those of you doing the wrong things. Just one example of this is as follows;

Chris stated: "I am not going down the "Measurement" path"

Going on to say things like: "I ask you, Bill Alek gave most everything, is his credibility better off for it? No, people say: "Measurement Error" without even having the slightest understanding of what's going on! Or even the slightest idea on why it works, or how an Excess Energy Gain might even be Achieved!" and "I remind everyone, Bill is an EE, to call it "Measurement Error" is ridiculous especially with no evidence to the contrary!"

Chris gave you zero measurement data, yet some of you tried your dandiest to pin "measurement error" on Chris.

Some of you, grasping for errors, find an AC Coupling setting on an oscilloscope image in a video, which had no measurement data, which renders the oscilloscope coupling irrelevant. Yet some of you used this, irrelevant data, to try to discredit Chris.

Chris knew this, played along with your game. Why would Chris put measurement error in quotation marks? I started digging, here's what I found:

Top names with the use of the phrase: 'measurement error' here on this forum mixed with some baseline names for comparrison.

    Name        Occurrences        Posts      Frequency
    picowatt          17                1980          0.86%
    milehigh          24                7605          0.32%
    verpies             7                 3375          0.21%
    tinselkoala       28               13815         0.20%
    Itsu                 2                  1230         0.16%
    ramset             9                  6285         0.14%
    pirate88179     11                 8355         0.13%
    stivep               2                  1590         0.13%
    minie                2                  1230         0.08%
    synchro             1                  3465         0.03%
    cap-z-ro            1                  3540         0.03%
    pih123              0                    150         0.0%

Chris, presenting Partnered Output Coil technology, warned us, but how much did he warn us?


    Name        Occurrences        Posts      Frequency
  emjunkie            46               3000         1.53%


There you have it. A normal occurrence might be 0, 1 or 2 times, 46 times, almost twice that of tinselkoala at 24 times, enough to raise warning flags.

It is obvious, some here are making judgement, calling 'measurement error' when they have no right to do so, some not even having the qualification; ramset is not a qualified electrical engineer!

The only time anyone can be trusted in this event is:

    1: A qualified electrical engineer has done the required measurements on the actual device being examined.


You, the readers should not take those words for granted.