----> PROOF Magnets Have a SPINNING Magnetic Field

[MileHigh]

I suspect there is another process taking place that explains the digital and analog meter measurements in that clip.

When you put the probes of a digital multimeter between your thumb and forefinger of your left and right hands you can measure a voltage when the multimeter is set on the most sensitive scale.  Why is that?

It's possible that your body is picking up 50 or 60 Hz hum from the electrical wiring.  You can easily see that on a scope or hear it when you touch the input of an audio amplifier.

But let's look more carefully at very small DC voltage and current measurements.  You have the multimeter probes in each hand and you can sometimes see a small DC voltage or current.

The surface of your skin is salty and the tips of your fingers are covered in what we call "finger grease."   So you can easily create a very weak chemical battery due to the salty finger grease on your fingers when you hold the two probes between the thumb and forefinger of each hand.

Here is what Lasersaber may be setting up in his experiment:

<probe metal> <salty finger grease #1> <dissimilar keeper metal> <salty finger grease #2> <probe metal>

That could very easily be a Count Volta chemical battery.

The big clue is that Lasersaber does not measure any voltage on the top and bottom of the keeper metal in the clip.  That's where there is much less finger grease.  But he does measure voltage on the inside and outside of the keeper metal.  That's where there is a lot of finger grease.

Where he made a mistake is to not try the same test without the keeper being energized.

[triffid]

Acca,your article about splitting water with magnets has an error in it.I did a similar experiment years ago.The two magnets I had were nickleplated magnet cubes.One eroded and the other did not.It meant that I had created a weak battery(about 1/10 volt).It turned out that the weak electric current could split some water with the magnetic field present.In your article the magnet poles were made of soft iron and a wire connects them shorting them out and allowing a weak current to flow.Looks like a battery to me.I have done tests making same metal electrodes for batteries and find that most of the time the same metal is disimilar enough to generate a 1/10 V voltage.triffid

[Acca]

 Here is the duplication of Dr. Felix Ehrenhaft "MAGNET WATER SPLITTER"works with NO electricity


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9u7L-J59iZw

Acca.






In March 1944, Radio-Craft published an article, "Magnetic Current --- Discovery of the Age?". It described the work of refugee scientist

Felix Ehrenhaft, Director of the Physics Institute, University of Vienna. Ehrenhaft believed that he had discovered particles with a

one-pole magnetic charge (either N or S but not both). Ehrenhaft made a number of other experiments that supported his hypothesis.

Unfortunately one of the most dramatic ones --- indicating that water could be decomposed magnetically --- went wrong. It was

absolutely unrepeatable. The professor was tremendously embarrassed, and to some extent withdrew from public discussion, carrying

on his experimental work in the semi-seclusion of Manhattan College.

He returned to his post in Vienna after the war, and some of his later work was published in French and other scientific journals. He died
not so long after.





http://www.americanradiohistory.com/Archive-Radio-Craft/1940s/Radio-Craft-1944-03.pdf


on page 14 of this document.

Publications by Felix Ehrenhaft

"Photophoresis and the Influence upon it of Electric and Magnetic fields", Philosophical. Mag. 11 (1931),140-146
"Physical and Astronomical information Concerning Particles of the Order of Magnitude of the Wavelength of Light", J. Franklin Institute, vol 230: 381-393 (Sept. 1940)
( and Banet, Leo): "Is there a true magnetism or not", Philosophy of. Science 8 (1941), 458-462
"Stationary Electric and Magnetic Fields in Beams of Light", Nature 147: 25 (Jan. 4, 1941).
"Photophoresis and Its Interpretation by Electric and Magnetic Ions", J. Franklin Institute, vol 233 (March 1942), pp. 235-255.
"The Magnetic Current", Science 94: 232-233 (Sept 5, 1941).
(and Banet, Leo): "The Magnetic Ion", Science 96: 228-229 (Sept. 4, 1942).
"The Magnetic Current in Gases", Physical Review 61: 733 (1942).
"Decomposition of Matter Through the Magnet (Magnetolysis)", Physical Review 63: 216 (1943).
"Magnetolysis and the Electric Field Around the Magnetic Current", Physical Review 63: 461-462 (1943).
"Further Facts Concerning the magnetic Current", Physical Review 64: 43 (1943).
"New Experiments about the Magnetic Current", Physical Review 65: 62-63 (1944).
"Continuation of Experiments with the Magnetic Current", Physical Review 65: 256 (1944).
"The Decomposition of Water by the So-Called Permanent Magnet...", Physical Review 65: 287-289 (May 1944).
"The Magnetic Current", Nature 154: 426-427 (Sept. 30, 1944) [/font]

[Acca]

Here are two more video clips from me.   About a magnetvortex and gas bubbles attracted to the ploe of the magnet.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AEM6CM7aRNk

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kAVWlyMrjX4

Here is the impossible article from 1944 headline:

Magnetic Current Discovery of the Age ?

"Electrical science may well be on the verge of a new era; an age in which magnetism will duplicate or exceed the

advances of current electricity. The action of magnetic particles in a strong field, movement of electrically-charged

BUBBLES OF GAS SPIRALLY around a magnetic field set up in a liquid, and above all, the decomposition of water by

magnetism, prove that such discoveries are, and what their effects may be, only the future can tell. "

Radio Craft Electronics magazine March 1944 by Fred Shunman
see page 11 and page 14 main article.

Acca[/font]

[triffid]

Acca,I have been doing some more thinking on the water splitting process with magnets.Looking back I used a plastic screen to hold my cube magnets apart.I got bubbles after a few days(4 or 5).One magnet got badly corroded.Once I realized I had a weak battery I quit the experiment.But NOW i realize more may have happening than I realized.I did not have a huge amount of gas released.Just had a few bubbles. I never had it tested.But now I realise I was getting bubbles at about .1 volts.  1.2 volts is what brute force electroylsis requires.Since h2 gas is repelled by a magnetic field.That could also help explain why your intial video said mostly h2 gas was found?At least 80%?Now the amount of gas released was small(in my experiment).I recently learned that the element carbon is magnetic.Maybe carbon electrodes could help the process?