Overunity.com Archives is Temporarily on Read Mode Only!



Free Energy will change the World - Free Energy will stop Climate Change - Free Energy will give us hope
and we will not surrender until free energy will be enabled all over the world, to power planes, cars, ships and trains.
Free energy will help the poor to become independent of needing expensive fuels.
So all in all Free energy will bring far more peace to the world than any other invention has already brought to the world.
Those beautiful words were written by Stefan Hartmann/Owner/Admin at overunity.com
Unfortunately now, Stefan Hartmann is very ill and He needs our help
Stefan wanted that I have all these massive data to get it back online
even being as ill as Stefan is, he transferred all databases and folders
that without his help, this Forum Archives would have never been published here
so, please, as the Webmaster and Creator of these Archives, I am asking that you help him
by making a donation on the Paypal Button above.
You can visit us or register at my main site at:
Overunity Machines Forum



Open Systems

Started by allcanadian, January 25, 2015, 09:23:46 AM

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 6 Guests are viewing this topic.

tinman

Quote from: MarkE on January 26, 2015, 09:50:26 AM
We have talked about the different things going on.  We have yet to perform any kind of numerical accounting.  An accounting means that we will actual construct a model even if it is just a simple paper form or better a spreadsheet.  Then there is the matter of obtaining data to assign each item. 

Is it your belief that you are going to get a surplus of energy on paper without performing measurements?
This is why you are doing all the accounting for the energy conversions Mark-you are putting it on paper. We are useing your beloved laws of physics to account for all energy in,and all energy out/disipated. This is why i am asking you(and others) to make sure we have converted and accounted for all the energy the battery delivered.

MarkE

Quote from: tinman on January 26, 2015, 03:38:04 PM
This is why you are doing all the accounting for the energy conversions Mark-you are putting it on paper. We are useing your beloved laws of physics to account for all energy in,and all energy out/disipated. This is why i am asking you(and others) to make sure we have converted and accounted for all the energy the battery delivered.
In order to do so we have to agree on all the inputs and outputs.  When you are ready to describe the entire test set-up, we can do that.

TinselKoala

"HHO" implies monoatomic gases. These gases (hydrogen and oxygen) do not exist in unbound monoatomic forms at normal temperatures and pressures! They exist as diatomic molecules, H2 and O2.  Careful measurements of volumes, and considering the combined Boyle-Charles-GayLussac law, will show the true nature of the evolved gases.

From one mole of water, 18 grams of H2O, "HHO" implies 3 moles (~22.4 liters x 3) of evolved dry gases at STP. But if the gases are actually the diatomic species H2 and O2 we expect one mole of H2 and one-half mole of O2 from one mole of H2O, that is (~22.4 liters x 1.5) of evolved dry gasses at STP.

Has anyone who claims "HHO" monoatomic gases actually done this molar volume measurement properly (that is, drying and cooling the evolved gases to make dry gas at STP for the volume measurement)?

profitis

This gas buoancy device will work.h2 gas is swallowed at cathode and spits out of anode.only 0.1v-0.2v power source is needed and height of column can be made arbritarily large.this will work because entropy actually increases at base and decreases at top making some margin for gain

tinman

Quote from: MarkE on January 26, 2015, 03:41:22 PM
In order to do so we have to agree on all the inputs and outputs.  When you are ready to describe the entire test set-up, we can do that.
There will be no more input to the electrolisis unit other than that of what the batteries supply.There will however be an additional output from an open system that is a result of the actions of the closed system-but dose not impinge on that closed system-the electrolisis system.
If you are happy that we have accounted for all the energy the battery supplied to the electrolisis unit in the end form of heat, then we will move on. If you are not satisfied that we have converted all the supplied energy into heat, then this must be resolved before we go any further. The reason being that it must be a proof of concept on paper, as it would be very expensive to build and test-but with the monies avaliable, it can be done quite easily