Fifty Quadrillion Dollar Energy Discovery Suppressed!

[gravityblock]

Thorium - L.F.T.R. ( https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7sG9_OplUK8 )


Gravock

[ramset]

Seems an even bigger "Cat" may be scratching at the Bag


https://docs.google.com/document/d/1BbE6V6HKHC3NOOSJmI9QEgP3H5EXcuGDPNn5Oc787RQ/edit


Chet K

[MarkE]

Seems an even bigger "Cat" may be scratching at the Bag


https://docs.google.com/document/d/1BbE6V6HKHC3NOOSJmI9QEgP3H5EXcuGDPNn5Oc787RQ/edit


Chet K

What you've got are experiments that from Parkhomov that are at best inspired by Rossi's claims and where Parkhomov reports excess heat.  Parkhomov reports that he needs to take his DUTs to 1100C before his fuel effectively ignites.  This is very different than the Rossi's eCat claims and even substantially different than his Hot Cat claims.  Rossi should be left to his second career as a carnival barker.

Parkhomov's 1.73:1 results are interesting enough that they should be replicated using better controls, integration of all input energy, and no phase conversion in the cooling water.  The more recent 1.12:1 results are far less encouraging and suggest measurement error.  It should cost less than $10,000 in materials and instrument rentals to set-up and conduct such an experiment.

[gravityblock]

Seems an even bigger "Cat" may be scratching at the Bag


https://docs.google.com/document/d/1BbE6V6HKHC3NOOSJmI9QEgP3H5EXcuGDPNn5Oc787RQ/edit


Chet K

The LFTR has nearly a 100 percent mass to energy coversion in the form of electrical output and it's considered a "puesdo cat" where it produces almost as much catalyst as it consumes.  I believe China has stepped up to the plate and is currently in the process of building more than 20+ LFTR's.

The LENR consumes it's catalysts and the conversion from heat to electrical output is inefficient.

Gravock

[MarkE]

The LFTR has nearly a 100 percent mass to energy coversion in the form of electrical output and it's considered a "puesdo cat" where it produces almost as much catalyst as it consumes.  I believe China has stepped up to the plate and is currently in the process of building more than 20+ LFTR's.

The LENR consumes it's catalysts and the conversion from heat to electrical output is inefficient.

Gravock

The LFTR does not convert 100 percent mass to energy.  It utilizes nearly 100% of the fission energy, whereas a conventional light water reactor utilizes less tan 1%.  LFTRs are still steam boilers, but can produce high temperature steam.  China and India are both working fairly aggressively on LFTRs.

LFTRs promise to be far more resistant to weapons profileration, are massively safer than PLWRs of today, and generate waste that has orders of magnitude shorter half life than PWLRs.  But they still generate radioactive waste, whereas if LENR is real, it supposedly does not.