Rosch taking orders on OU Bouyancy device.

[tinman]

To prove that you're "full of it" on the pathological skeptic end of the spectrum, let me cite AN example that obliterates what you just said.

SHT has had three third-party tests by highly reputable organizations doing quantitative analysis showing ~500x, ~1300x, and ~900x output. Four third-party tests showing ~97% H output, from H2O input.

Also, Rossi has had considerable testing done, not to mention that his technology was purchased by Industrial Heat, as part of a 2 billion dollar fund, if I remember right, after 1 year due diligence.

You're like the Wright Brothers skeptics who for four years continued to say heavier-than-air flight would not be possible, despite the FACT that they were flying around doing demonstrations. Now that is obvious, then it wasn't. Guess where I would have been back then... Versus you...

No Sterling-->it is you that is(and always has been)full of sh*t. You took other peoples money ,and went on your little vacations with nothing to show in the end-->every time.
You think im full of it,then please show us all a looped system running itself with excess energy left over-->you never have,and you never will-that is fact.

You are sick,and you need help-->or just locked up to keep us all safe.

SHT has had three third-party tests by highly reputable organizations doing quantitative analysis showing ~500x, ~1300x, and ~900x output.

The only letter missing in SHT is the I,and that is what it is.
Any thing you post is never third party tested by anyone that knows what there doing-->your record speaks for itself. 500 X the input hey,cool-no problem there to perform a self looped system,and have 499% of the input left to do work. This will be another device you cannot back up-->just as you have not been able to do since you started on your crowd funded holidays.

The only thing you have ever gotten right is that 911 was an inside job. Maybe you should stick with that,and leave your epic fails behind you.

[tinman]

You need to take your experiment to the end.  Generate enough work to return to your starting state with even just a scintilla left over.  Then you will have something remarkable.  What your apparatus does is move energy.  Some of that energy moved is from the local atmosphere.  Such is the operation of a heat pump.  If you are intent on staying warm or trying to cool off, heat pumps can be very useful devices.  If you are intent on performing kinetic work, they don't help.  It seems that the only way that you will learn is to take your experiments to their logical conclusion where you compare useful work done.

Mark
I can only do so much in a given amount of time. I simply dont have a money tree out in the back yard,so i do what i can when i can. I have managed to achieve good results with what i have so far,and the results can only get better given the equipment i need. As im doing it off my own back,i simply have to wait for the funds to become avaliable. As much as i'd like to be able to complete the whole system in a couple of day's,it just isnt going to happen. I got the effect and results i was looking for with the venturi setup,and i got better results with the venturi removed,and the ram put into place. ATM this is as far as i can go until i have the rest of the equipment.

If it fails,then it is only my loss. If it works,then it is everyones gain.

[sterlinga]

No Sterling-->it is you that is(and always has been)full of sh*t. You took other peoples money ,and went on your little vacations with nothing to show in the end-->every time.

The only thing you have ever gotten right is that 911 was an inside job.

Tinman, they weren't "vacations." I worked my butt off. Even when we went to Fabrice Andre's place, I was publishing stories about what was going on as we were there. Only took an hour to walk around the mountain top.

Yildiz is likely to eventually make it. I still think he's for real.

In my world, the glass is half full, not the other way around.

Glad to hear you're clued into 9/11 being an inside job. Says a lot.

[tinman]

Building 7 came down in classic demolition manner. Anyone can see that. No college degree required.

This much is true.
One also has to wonder as to why traces of thermite was found all around the collaps buildings.

[MarkE]

Okay, so you're also among the "show me the data" crowd who believe the "official" 9/11 lies. Pathetic.

Building 7 came down in classic demolition manner. Anyone can see that. No college degree required.

I believe the NIST report researched and written by the: skilled, upstanding, and patriotic men and women who work for the same organization where your own father spent his career.  I've read the report.  Have you?.

Building 7 failed because of massive damage done when it was struck by debris from WTC1 and fires that burned uncontrolled on Floors 7, 8, 9, 11, 12, and 13 throughout the day.  Just prior to the collapse there is footage with a lone reporter at Barclay and West Broadway.  The fires shooting out of the building over Broadway were in a word:  ferocious.  He and his camera man were right there to the collapse, eventually running for their lives.  Contrary to your conspiracy theory there is no sound of sequential explosives as used in a controlled demolition.  The building failed first near where the reporter was and subsequently failures spread out.  The camera footage you like to point to views the building looking at it from the north west which failed last.  If only you spent half the time you spend screaming controlled demolition watching the available footage and studying the NIST report you would realize just how wrong you are.  Maybe you can ask Jesus to bring a structural engineer with him to supper and they can disabuse you of this fantasy you insist upon.