Overunity.com Archives is Temporarily on Read Mode Only!



Free Energy will change the World - Free Energy will stop Climate Change - Free Energy will give us hope
and we will not surrender until free energy will be enabled all over the world, to power planes, cars, ships and trains.
Free energy will help the poor to become independent of needing expensive fuels.
So all in all Free energy will bring far more peace to the world than any other invention has already brought to the world.
Those beautiful words were written by Stefan Hartmann/Owner/Admin at overunity.com
Unfortunately now, Stefan Hartmann is very ill and He needs our help
Stefan wanted that I have all these massive data to get it back online
even being as ill as Stefan is, he transferred all databases and folders
that without his help, this Forum Archives would have never been published here
so, please, as the Webmaster and Creator of these Archives, I am asking that you help him
by making a donation on the Paypal Button above.
You can visit us or register at my main site at:
Overunity Machines Forum



Rosch taking orders on OU Bouyancy device.

Started by ramset, April 26, 2015, 09:52:03 AM

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 9 Guests are viewing this topic.

tinman

Quote from: MarkE on April 30, 2015, 02:21:54 AM
Are you familiar with the terms:  tensile strength, and yield strength?  Do you think that steel suddenly loses its strength at its melting temperature?  Did you read the NIST report?
Yes,i am quite familiar with tensile and yield strengths,but that is not what i asked. How is it that the steel melted when the temperatures just didnt get anywhere near the temperatures needed to melt the steel columns. Demolition experts also confirmed that building 7 was a controlled demolition. The fire could have guttered that building,and the framework would have still been standing.

See pic below. Now that is what you call a hot fire-->but even so,even the mild steel scafolding is still standing lol,yet the buildings designed to withstand plane strikes come tumbling down-->aint that a hoot,and the building that never got hit by anything other than some debris,managed to fall all in one hit,and do so that resembled a controlled demolition in every way lol.. Oh,and the pilot that couldnt even fly a single engine cessna managed to overcome the ground effect,and fly a 757 just above the ground to crash it into the pentagon-->undetected and unchallenged by one of the worlds most heavily guarded air spaces lol. They even interviewed his flight instructor,who said Quote: the lad couldnt even perform a solo flight in a single engine cessna-->but it seems a 757 was a piece of cake lol.

d3x0r


PVC has higher density than I assumed... I grabbed some half-inch PVC and was playing with it... but having air in it and capped and it almost sank on its own :(


So... accounting for pipe wall thickness and applying the 1.3-1.45 density of PVC 0.5" and result is less output than input....


half to go up to at least .75... but will probably 1+ is better so the air displacment exceeds the weight of pvc displacment




MarkE

Quote from: tinman on April 30, 2015, 02:55:29 AM
Yes,i am quite familiar with tensile and yield strengths,but that is not what i asked. How is it that the steel melted when the temperatures just didnt get anywhere near the temperatures needed to melt the steel columns. Demolition experts also confirmed that building 7 was a controlled demolition. The fire could have guttered that building,and the framework would have still been standing.
Apparently you are not despite your claims or you would understand that structural steel loses 90% of its strength at temperatures of ordinary plastic and wood fires.  Fireproofing applied to structural steel slows down heat penetration.  Those fires burned all day. Have you read the NIST report?
Quote

See pic below. Now that is what you call a hot fire-->but even so,even the mild steel scafolding is still standing lol,yet the buildings designed to withstand plane strikes come tumbling down-->aint that a hoot,and the building that never got hit by anything other than some debris,managed to fall all in one hit,and do so that resembled a controlled demolition in every way lol..
The LOL joke is on you and all the conspiracy theorists who substitute what they think is "common sense" for science.  It is willful ignorance on parade.
QuoteOh,and the pilot that couldnt even fly a single engine cessna managed to overcome the ground effect,and fly a 757 just above the ground to crash it into the pentagon-->undetected and unchallenged by one of the worlds most heavily guarded air spaces lol. They even interviewed his flight instructor,who said Quote: the lad couldnt even perform a solo flight in a single engine cessna-->but it seems a 757 was a piece of cake lol.
Do you fly?  Do you understand that ground effect helps keep the plane off the ground?

hartiberlin

Well, Gaia explained now here:
http://gaia-energy.org/liveticker-aukw-besichtigungen-29-04-2015/#comment-337
(you can see this comment only, if you are logged into the Gaia Site...)

what IP-Cameras they used.
It were:

TRENDNET TV-IP310PI with Infrared-LEDs und Power over Ethernet Connections.


Here are the spec sheets:

http://www.trendnet.com/langge/products/proddetail.asp?prod=190_TV-IP310PI

http://www.trendnet.com/langge/products/proddetail.asp?prod=190_TV-IP310PI#tabs-solution02


Due to that they record at 30 frames/sec you can also see the flickering as the difference
frequency 20Hz as interference to the 50 Hz used in Germany.

These cameras toggle to Infrared Mode, if the light went out, so that is why they put on their
Infrared LEDs which illuminated the room, which I thought was an emergency hall light...
but it was only these Infrared LEDs of the cameras.

So as they are powered By Power Over Ethernet, we still are not sure, if there really
was a power outage in the hall, so the cameras still operated from the hall power supply
or if the cameras hang over Ethernet on a different power supply via the router then...


Anyway, here are now the 2 new Videos from Gaia.

http://gaia-energy.org/wp-content/uploads/2015/04/150410-gaia-rosch-aukw-generator-closeup-shortvideo-copyright-ssb.mp4
http://gaia-energy.org/wp-content/uploads/2015/04/150429-gaia-rosch-aukw-generator-loadtest-copyright-ssb.mp4


Now it is hard to explain, how they do the frequency change on the load change, if they would have faked
it with a hidden power cable...

As the frequency is very stable if this would be powered by a hidden cable by the grid, this
would be an indication that they really have a generator sitting there acting to a load change with
a frequency change...

So if they would have faked this somehow, they would have needed to manipulate the frequency counter
somehow, so that it reads different frequencies, when the load on the "motor(generator)" is changed...

Hmm, either they use a 3 Phase Frequencychanger unit, which would be really elaborate expensive
or something simpler, like a hacked or modded frequency meter....

Hmm, or I am totally wrong and it really works and they might have really there an OU generator
which does not need much more torque, if more loads are applied..but only changes slightly in output frequenvy...

I am still puzzled a bit now and scratching my head...(from the standpoint of the skeptic)

P.S: Also there is now a new interview from STerling Allan with Roberto Reuter and Ronny Korsberg here:

http://pesn.com/2015/04/30/9602615_Roberto-Reuter-GAIA-CEO_interview/
Stefan Hartmann, Moderator of the overunity.com forum

hartiberlin

Okay, Gaia has just posted a new article that says:

http://gaia-energy.org/liveticker-aukw-besichtigungen-halbzeitbilanz/

Heute am 5. Tag der Livebesichigungen in Spich wollen wir uns ganz herzlich bei Euch bedanken.
DAS ERSTE MEGAWATT IST ÜBERSCHRITTEN ....
Auch die stetige Wiederholung von Argumentationen, weshalb es nicht funktionieren soll,
können die Wahrheit nicht verhindern ... unser AuKW läuft stabil und zuverlässig!


Danke an Alle, die dieses Projekt unterstützen. Danke an Jeden, der bald sein eigenes AuKW errichtet und an Jeden,
der uns sein Vertrauen noch schenken möchte. Wir danken auch den süßen und bitteren Kommentatoren –
auch Ihr habt zur Wahrnehmung dieser großartigen Technologie und deren Weiterentwicklung beigetragen.
Wir sind eine große Gemeinschaft von Energiepionieren und gemeinsam schreiben wir große Geschichte.
Ohne die zahlreichen Kommentare, Meinungsbekundungen und kritische Hinterfragungen wären
wir vielleciht nicht da, wo wir sind – nach dem erstem Megawatt eigenen AuKW Strom.

That means:
Today is the 5th day of the Live Demo in Spich and we want to thanks you all.
The first produced MegaWatt of power is surpassed... and the contineous argumentation, why it should not work,
can not prevent the truth. our AuKW is running stable and reliable.



Thanks to all who supported this project.
Thanks to those who will soon have their own AuKW at their homes and to all, who still want to trust us and still want to order.
We also thank for all the sweet and bitter comments, also you have contributed to the spreading of this great technology
and their further development. We are a big community of energy pioneers and together we write new history.
Without the multiple comments, opinions and critical thinkings we would not be there where we are now
at the surpassing of the first own produced MegaWatt of power from our own AuKW.

Stefan Hartmann, Moderator of the overunity.com forum