Overunity.com Archives is Temporarily on Read Mode Only!



Free Energy will change the World - Free Energy will stop Climate Change - Free Energy will give us hope
and we will not surrender until free energy will be enabled all over the world, to power planes, cars, ships and trains.
Free energy will help the poor to become independent of needing expensive fuels.
So all in all Free energy will bring far more peace to the world than any other invention has already brought to the world.
Those beautiful words were written by Stefan Hartmann/Owner/Admin at overunity.com
Unfortunately now, Stefan Hartmann is very ill and He needs our help
Stefan wanted that I have all these massive data to get it back online
even being as ill as Stefan is, he transferred all databases and folders
that without his help, this Forum Archives would have never been published here
so, please, as the Webmaster and Creator of these Archives, I am asking that you help him
by making a donation on the Paypal Button above.
You can visit us or register at my main site at:
Overunity Machines Forum



Friedrich Luling Magnet Motor

Started by DreamThinkBuild, July 05, 2015, 05:31:08 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 2 Guests are viewing this topic.

TommeyReed

Hi nix85,

Now that I have a real prototype, I can see that the best way would be looking at the gear ratio. As the linear drive moves in on direction a complete 120degress of mechanical movement is produced. if you have 4 magnets set at 90,180,225 and 360deg this could increase speed, but testing is really needed. The Magnets need to be close in the center of the shaft to repel the linear drive from the inside. Magnet cogging is far less then having it in the circumference of the flywheel where it would slow down.

Thanks for you opinion.

Testing is needed...

Tom

nix85

Hi Tommey, i have seen many ideas similar to yours, most of them 10+ years old. I believe the
wankel + zero cog neutralizer combination is far far more efficient than other designs, cog wheels
only add to inefficiency + lack of zero cog neutralizer such system is doomed in the start. But
you should of course test it if you believe in it.

One of countless similar designs without a neutralizer using pistons.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yrD_TYpXnsc




nix85

For neutralizer single layer of neodymium magnets should be used, i would use small cubes cause
magnets have high flux near the edges and weak in the middle so if you use big magnets there is
obviously an irregularity which many tiny magnets solve. They should be forced as close together as
possible inside an iron sleeve/box, i'd use 1 or 2mm wall thickness, to force them together a thick iron
plate should be temporarily placed on the outside until they are as close as possible, then box should
be sealed. Then neutralizer should be placed at predicted distance from the rotor magnet and additional
layers of thin iron should be glued if needed to find perfect balance where there is no attraction nor
repulsion. When this is achieved a good mechanism should be made akin to linear motor or a plunger
that can insert the screen in the desired position fast and remove it. If forces are balanced energy
needed to do this will be minimal and big rotor magnet will be effortlessly shielded from the sticky point.

--

I have been accused by a troll here, we can see now who is 'arrogant and condescending' and 'a flamer,
not a true helper', and who actually gives valuable help and solutions. But nevermind.

nix85


TommeyReed

Hi nix85,

Interesting design, have you built any of them? The problem with drawings it base on theories, I think you already know other expect a real prototype.

I know you already know that by now, but it is something that also needs to be looked at in the future.

I have no problem working with you to create a prototypes if you like, I have the basic skills to copy basic drawings.

Keep up the good work.

Tom.